From efb0d5844a6d37dab6db0240f684898f5a28338c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Benjamin Franzke Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 14:23:33 +0200 Subject: run_tests: Rather call the combined l&q ..since its mainly logarithmic. --- run_tests.m | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/run_tests.m b/run_tests.m index c88ea60..c9f65ef 100644 --- a/run_tests.m +++ b/run_tests.m @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ random_data = rand_pred(train_data, 14); % quadratic just for reference, it sucks more than mean-predicition [quqerr, quterr] = calc_error('quad reg.',real_data, quad_data); [loqerr, loterr] = calc_error('log reg.', real_data, log_data); -[loqerr, loterr] = calc_error('q+l reg.', real_data, [ log_data(:,1:334) quad_data(:,335) log_data(:,336:570) ]); +[loqerr, loterr] = calc_error('l&q reg.', real_data, [ log_data(:,1:334) quad_data(:,335) log_data(:,336:570) ]); [seqerr, seterr] = calc_error('sevenday', real_data, sevenday_data); [raqerr, raterr] = calc_error('random', real_data, random_data); -- cgit