summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMatthieu Patou <mat@matws.net>2011-07-12 19:22:35 +0400
committerMatthieu Patou <mat@samba.org>2011-07-13 02:29:20 +0200
commitf97e4f6b8f0693c737bfaf1c4d58ea52d8854306 (patch)
treebbca9904a14077e0a5dc0e9238a18a7c668ee745
parenta1c1f8c83b49c46acfaa6ecd4df125828ebc2199 (diff)
downloadsamba-f97e4f6b8f0693c737bfaf1c4d58ea52d8854306.tar.gz
samba-f97e4f6b8f0693c737bfaf1c4d58ea52d8854306.tar.bz2
samba-f97e4f6b8f0693c737bfaf1c4d58ea52d8854306.zip
ldb-tdb: Introduce a flag on ltdb_add_internal to indicate whether unique value test should be performed or not
The function ltdb_add_internal is called either from ltdb_add or ltdb_rename. In case of add we enforce the unique test (unless it has been relaxed by a upper module through the LDB_FLAG_INTERNAL_DISABLE_SINGLE_VALUE_CHECK flag), but for rename as it is translated by a delete + a add we relax the test as we can have one or more attribute which are supposed to be single valued but that are not (ie. when we have a couple of deleted value on a single valued attribute), we have already done the tests on insert so make the assumption that the values are OK. Without this patch deleting a subnet that has been affected to more than one site fails as the delete is in fact a rename to GUID\0DEL ... with an attribute siteObject that has 1 active link value and 1 inactive link value Autobuild-User: Matthieu Patou <mat@samba.org> Autobuild-Date: Wed Jul 13 02:29:20 CEST 2011 on sn-devel-104
-rw-r--r--lib/ldb/ldb_tdb/ldb_tdb.c15
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/lib/ldb/ldb_tdb/ldb_tdb.c b/lib/ldb/ldb_tdb/ldb_tdb.c
index 0d4be49123..d111e01118 100644
--- a/lib/ldb/ldb_tdb/ldb_tdb.c
+++ b/lib/ldb/ldb_tdb/ldb_tdb.c
@@ -311,7 +311,8 @@ static bool ldb_tdb_single_valued(const struct ldb_schema_attribute *a,
}
static int ltdb_add_internal(struct ldb_module *module,
- const struct ldb_message *msg)
+ const struct ldb_message *msg,
+ bool check_single_value)
{
struct ldb_context *ldb = ldb_module_get_ctx(module);
int ret = LDB_SUCCESS;
@@ -326,7 +327,9 @@ static int ltdb_add_internal(struct ldb_module *module,
el->name, ldb_dn_get_linearized(msg->dn));
return LDB_ERR_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATION;
}
- if (el->num_values > 1 && ldb_tdb_single_valued(a, el)) {
+ if (check_single_value &&
+ el->num_values > 1 &&
+ ldb_tdb_single_valued(a, el)) {
ldb_asprintf_errstring(ldb, "SINGLE-VALUE attribute %s on %s specified more than once",
el->name, ldb_dn_get_linearized(msg->dn));
return LDB_ERR_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATION;
@@ -373,7 +376,7 @@ static int ltdb_add(struct ltdb_context *ctx)
return LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR;
}
- ret = ltdb_add_internal(module, req->op.add.message);
+ ret = ltdb_add_internal(module, req->op.add.message, true);
return ret;
}
@@ -998,7 +1001,11 @@ static int ltdb_rename(struct ltdb_context *ctx)
return LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR;
}
- ret = ltdb_add_internal(module, msg);
+ /* We don't check single value as we can have more than 1 with
+ * deleted attributes. We could go through all elements but that's
+ * maybe not the most efficient way
+ */
+ ret = ltdb_add_internal(module, msg, false);
return ret;
}