diff options
author | Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> | 2006-07-14 05:43:00 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Gerald (Jerry) Carter <jerry@samba.org> | 2007-10-10 14:10:09 -0500 |
commit | 624544f06561a5fcf374dd29d26838642bee0670 (patch) | |
tree | 5349594795d03db65bc1232cce58c6abff38d982 | |
parent | 6078bfda5eea773c1c59cc6007047feb4424df05 (diff) | |
download | samba-624544f06561a5fcf374dd29d26838642bee0670.tar.gz samba-624544f06561a5fcf374dd29d26838642bee0670.tar.bz2 samba-624544f06561a5fcf374dd29d26838642bee0670.zip |
r17031: When I first revived the objectclass sorting module, simo complained
that it should handle the add without a search.
Now that I'm working on better behaviour with an LDAP backend, I've
fixed the module to do just that. For an ADD, and a MODIFY with the
REPLACE flag, we do not need the search step.
Andrew Bartlett
(This used to be commit 87573e2ee4a71168ea69182d2dc4ebf1779b7c02)
-rw-r--r-- | source4/lib/ldb/modules/objectclass.c | 444 |
1 files changed, 293 insertions, 151 deletions
diff --git a/source4/lib/ldb/modules/objectclass.c b/source4/lib/ldb/modules/objectclass.c index 473d5a3e6f..eaa3f4472b 100644 --- a/source4/lib/ldb/modules/objectclass.c +++ b/source4/lib/ldb/modules/objectclass.c @@ -51,6 +51,11 @@ struct oc_async_context { struct ldb_request *mod_req; }; +struct class_list { + struct class_list *prev, *next; + const char *objectclass; +}; + static struct ldb_async_handle *oc_init_handle(struct ldb_request *req, struct ldb_module *module) { struct oc_async_context *ac; @@ -82,11 +87,126 @@ static struct ldb_async_handle *oc_init_handle(struct ldb_request *req, struct l return h; } +static int objectclass_sort(struct ldb_module *module, + TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx, + struct ldb_message_element *objectclass_element, + struct class_list **sorted_out) +{ + int i; + int layer; + struct class_list *sorted = NULL, *parent_class = NULL, + *subclass = NULL, *unsorted = NULL, *current, *poss_subclass; + /* DESIGN: + * + * We work on 4 different 'bins' (implemented here as linked lists): + * + * * sorted: the eventual list, in the order we wish to push + * into the database. This is the only ordered list. + * + * * parent_class: The current parent class 'bin' we are + * trying to find subclasses for + * + * * subclass: The subclasses we have found so far + * + * * unsorted: The remaining objectClasses + * + * The process is a matter of filtering objectClasses up from + * unsorted into sorted. Order is irrelevent in the later 3 'bins'. + * + * We start with 'top' (found and promoted to parent_class + * initially). Then we find (in unsorted) all the direct + * subclasses of 'top'. parent_classes is concatenated onto + * the end of 'sorted', and subclass becomes the list in + * parent_class. + * + * We then repeat, until we find no more subclasses. Any left + * over classes are added to the end. + * + */ + + /* Firstly, dump all the objectClass elements into the + * unsorted bin, except for 'top', which is special */ + for (i=0; i < objectclass_element->num_values; i++) { + current = talloc(mem_ctx, struct class_list); + if (!current) { + ldb_set_errstring(module->ldb, talloc_asprintf(mem_ctx, "objectclass: out of memory allocating objectclass list")); + talloc_free(mem_ctx); + return LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR; + } + current->objectclass = (const char *)objectclass_element->values[i].data; + + /* this is the root of the tree. We will start + * looking for subclasses from here */ + if (ldb_attr_cmp("top", current->objectclass) == 0) { + DLIST_ADD(parent_class, current); + } else { + DLIST_ADD(unsorted, current); + } + } + + /* DEBUGGING aid: how many layers are we down now? */ + layer = 0; + do { + layer++; + /* Find all the subclasses of classes in the + * parent_classes. Push them onto the subclass list */ + + /* Ensure we don't bother if there are no unsorted entries left */ + for (current = parent_class; unsorted && current; current = current->next) { + const char **subclasses = ldb_subclass_list(module->ldb, current->objectclass); + + /* Walk the list of possible subclasses in unsorted */ + for (poss_subclass = unsorted; poss_subclass; ) { + struct class_list *next; + + /* Save the next pointer, as the DLIST_ macros will change poss_subclass->next */ + next = poss_subclass->next; + + for (i = 0; subclasses && subclasses[i]; i++) { + if (ldb_attr_cmp(poss_subclass->objectclass, subclasses[i]) == 0) { + DLIST_REMOVE(unsorted, poss_subclass); + DLIST_ADD(subclass, poss_subclass); + + break; + } + } + poss_subclass = next; + } + } + + /* Now push the parent_classes as sorted, we are done with + these. Add to the END of the list by concatenation */ + DLIST_CONCATENATE(sorted, parent_class, struct class_list *); + + /* and now find subclasses of these */ + parent_class = subclass; + subclass = NULL; + + /* If we didn't find any subclasses we will fall out + * the bottom here */ + } while (parent_class); + + /* This shouldn't happen, and would break MMC, but we can't + * afford to loose objectClasses. Perhaps there was no 'top', + * or some other schema error? + * + * Detecting schema errors is the job of the schema module, so + * at this layer we just try not to loose data + */ + DLIST_CONCATENATE(sorted, unsorted, struct class_list *); + + *sorted_out = sorted; + return LDB_SUCCESS; +} + static int objectclass_add(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request *req) { - struct ldb_async_handle *h; - struct oc_async_context *ac; - struct ldb_message_element *objectClassAttr; + struct ldb_message_element *objectclass_element; + struct class_list *sorted, *current; + struct ldb_request *down_req; + struct ldb_message *msg; + int ret; + TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx; ldb_debug(module->ldb, LDB_DEBUG_TRACE, "objectclass_add\n"); @@ -94,87 +214,210 @@ static int objectclass_add(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request *req) return ldb_next_request(module, req); } - objectClassAttr = ldb_msg_find_element(req->op.add.message, "objectClass"); + objectclass_element = ldb_msg_find_element(req->op.add.message, "objectClass"); /* If no part of this add has an objectClass, then we don't * need to make any changes. cn=rootdse doesn't have an objectClass */ - if (!objectClassAttr) { + if (!objectclass_element) { return ldb_next_request(module, req); } - h = oc_init_handle(req, module); - if (!h) { + mem_ctx = talloc_new(req); + if (mem_ctx == NULL) { return LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR; } - ac = talloc_get_type(h->private_data, struct oc_async_context); - /* return or own handle to deal with this call */ - req->async.handle = h; + ret = objectclass_sort(module, mem_ctx, objectclass_element, &sorted); + if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) { + return ret; + } /* prepare the first operation */ - ac->down_req = talloc_zero(ac, struct ldb_request); - if (ac->down_req == NULL) { + down_req = talloc(req, struct ldb_request); + if (down_req == NULL) { ldb_set_errstring(module->ldb, talloc_asprintf(module->ldb, "Out of memory!")); + talloc_free(mem_ctx); return LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR; } - *(ac->down_req) = *req; /* copy the request */ + *down_req = *req; /* copy the request */ + + down_req->op.add.message = msg = ldb_msg_copy_shallow(down_req, req->op.add.message); + + if (down_req->op.add.message == NULL) { + talloc_free(mem_ctx); + return LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR; + } - ac->down_req->async.context = NULL; - ac->down_req->async.callback = NULL; - ldb_set_timeout_from_prev_req(module->ldb, req, ac->down_req); + ldb_msg_remove_attr(msg, "objectClass"); + ret = ldb_msg_add_empty(msg, "objectClass", 0); + + if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) { + talloc_free(mem_ctx); + return ret; + } - ac->step = OC_DO_REQ; + /* We must completely replace the existing objectClass entry, + * because we need it sorted */ - return ldb_next_request(module, ac->down_req); + /* Move from the linked list back into an ldb msg */ + for (current = sorted; current; current = current->next) { + ret = ldb_msg_add_string(msg, "objectClass", current->objectclass); + if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) { + ldb_set_errstring(module->ldb, talloc_asprintf(mem_ctx, "objectclass: could not re-add sorted objectclass to modify msg")); + talloc_free(mem_ctx); + return ret; + } + } + + talloc_free(mem_ctx); + ret = ldb_msg_sanity_check(module->ldb, msg); + + if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) { + return ret; + } + + /* go on with the call chain */ + ret = ldb_next_request(module, down_req); + + /* do not free down_req as the call results may be linked to it, + * it will be freed when the upper level request get freed */ + if (ret == LDB_SUCCESS) { + req->async.handle = down_req->async.handle; + } + return ret; } static int objectclass_modify(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request *req) { - struct ldb_async_handle *h; - struct oc_async_context *ac; - struct ldb_message_element *objectClassAttr; - + struct ldb_message_element *objectclass_element; + struct ldb_message *msg; ldb_debug(module->ldb, LDB_DEBUG_TRACE, "objectclass_modify\n"); if (ldb_dn_is_special(req->op.mod.message->dn)) { /* do not manipulate our control entries */ return ldb_next_request(module, req); } - objectClassAttr = ldb_msg_find_element(req->op.mod.message, "objectClass"); + objectclass_element = ldb_msg_find_element(req->op.mod.message, "objectClass"); /* If no part of this touches the objectClass, then we don't * need to make any changes. */ /* If the only operation is the deletion of the objectClass then go on */ - if (!objectClassAttr) { + if (!objectclass_element) { return ldb_next_request(module, req); } - h = oc_init_handle(req, module); - if (!h) { - return LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR; - } - ac = talloc_get_type(h->private_data, struct oc_async_context); + switch (objectclass_element->flags & LDB_FLAG_MOD_MASK) { + case LDB_FLAG_MOD_DELETE: + /* Delete everything? Probably totally illigal, but hey! */ + if (objectclass_element->num_values == 0) { + return ldb_next_request(module, req); + } + break; + case LDB_FLAG_MOD_REPLACE: + { + struct ldb_request *down_req; + struct class_list *sorted, *current; + TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx; + int ret; + mem_ctx = talloc_new(req); + if (mem_ctx == NULL) { + return LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR; + } - /* return or own handle to deal with this call */ - req->async.handle = h; + /* prepare the first operation */ + down_req = talloc(req, struct ldb_request); + if (down_req == NULL) { + ldb_set_errstring(module->ldb, talloc_asprintf(module->ldb, "Out of memory!")); + talloc_free(mem_ctx); + return LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR; + } + + *down_req = *req; /* copy the request */ + + down_req->op.mod.message = msg = ldb_msg_copy_shallow(down_req, req->op.mod.message); + + if (down_req->op.add.message == NULL) { + talloc_free(mem_ctx); + return LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR; + } + + ret = objectclass_sort(module, mem_ctx, objectclass_element, &sorted); + if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) { + return ret; + } - /* prepare the first operation */ - ac->down_req = talloc_zero(ac, struct ldb_request); - if (ac->down_req == NULL) { - ldb_set_errstring(module->ldb, talloc_asprintf(module->ldb, "Out of memory!")); - return LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR; - } + /* We must completely replace the existing objectClass entry, + * because we need it sorted */ + + ldb_msg_remove_attr(msg, "objectClass"); + ret = ldb_msg_add_empty(msg, "objectClass", LDB_FLAG_MOD_REPLACE); + + if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) { + talloc_free(mem_ctx); + return ret; + } - *(ac->down_req) = *req; /* copy the request */ + /* Move from the linked list back into an ldb msg */ + for (current = sorted; current; current = current->next) { + ret = ldb_msg_add_string(msg, "objectClass", current->objectclass); + if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) { + ldb_set_errstring(module->ldb, talloc_asprintf(mem_ctx, "objectclass: could not re-add sorted objectclass to modify msg")); + talloc_free(mem_ctx); + return ret; + } + } + + talloc_free(mem_ctx); - ac->down_req->async.context = NULL; - ac->down_req->async.callback = NULL; - ldb_set_timeout_from_prev_req(module->ldb, req, ac->down_req); + ret = ldb_msg_sanity_check(module->ldb, msg); + if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) { + talloc_free(mem_ctx); + return ret; + } + + /* go on with the call chain */ + ret = ldb_next_request(module, down_req); + + /* do not free down_req as the call results may be linked to it, + * it will be freed when the upper level request get freed */ + if (ret == LDB_SUCCESS) { + req->async.handle = down_req->async.handle; + } + return ret; + } + } - ac->step = OC_DO_REQ; + { + struct ldb_async_handle *h; + struct oc_async_context *ac; + + h = oc_init_handle(req, module); + if (!h) { + return LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR; + } + ac = talloc_get_type(h->private_data, struct oc_async_context); + + /* return or own handle to deal with this call */ + req->async.handle = h; + + /* prepare the first operation */ + ac->down_req = talloc(ac, struct ldb_request); + if (ac->down_req == NULL) { + ldb_set_errstring(module->ldb, talloc_asprintf(module->ldb, "Out of memory!")); + return LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR; + } + + *(ac->down_req) = *req; /* copy the request */ + + ac->down_req->async.context = NULL; + ac->down_req->async.callback = NULL; + ldb_set_timeout_from_prev_req(module->ldb, req, ac->down_req); + + ac->step = OC_DO_REQ; - return ldb_next_request(module, ac->down_req); + return ldb_next_request(module, ac->down_req); + } } static int get_self_callback(struct ldb_context *ldb, void *context, struct ldb_async_result *ares) @@ -243,14 +486,7 @@ static int objectclass_do_mod(struct ldb_async_handle *h) { struct ldb_message_element *objectclass_element; struct ldb_message *msg; TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx; - struct class_list { - struct class_list *prev, *next; - const char *objectclass; - }; - struct class_list *sorted = NULL, *parent_class = NULL, - *subclass = NULL, *unsorted = NULL, *current, *poss_subclass; - int i; - int layer; + struct class_list *sorted, *current; int ret; ac = talloc_get_type(h->private_data, struct oc_async_context); @@ -280,117 +516,23 @@ static int objectclass_do_mod(struct ldb_async_handle *h) { return LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR; } - /* modify dn */ - msg->dn = ac->orig_req->op.mod.message->dn; - /* This is now the objectClass list from the database */ objectclass_element = ldb_msg_find_element(ac->search_res->message, "objectClass"); if (!objectclass_element) { - /* Perhaps the above was a remove? Move along now, nothing to see here */ + /* Where did it go? Move along now, nothing to see here */ talloc_free(mem_ctx); return LDB_SUCCESS; } - /* DESIGN: - * - * We work on 4 different 'bins' (implemented here as linked lists): - * - * * sorted: the eventual list, in the order we wish to push - * into the database. This is the only ordered list. - * - * * parent_class: The current parent class 'bin' we are - * trying to find subclasses for - * - * * subclass: The subclasses we have found so far - * - * * unsorted: The remaining objectClasses - * - * The process is a matter of filtering objectClasses up from - * unsorted into sorted. Order is irrelevent in the later 3 'bins'. - * - * We start with 'top' (found and promoted to parent_class - * initially). Then we find (in unsorted) all the direct - * subclasses of 'top'. parent_classes is concatenated onto - * the end of 'sorted', and subclass becomes the list in - * parent_class. - * - * We then repeat, until we find no more subclasses. Any left - * over classes are added to the end. - * - */ - - /* Firstly, dump all the objectClass elements into the - * unsorted bin, except for 'top', which is special */ - for (i=0; i < objectclass_element->num_values; i++) { - current = talloc(mem_ctx, struct class_list); - if (!current) { - ldb_set_errstring(ac->module->ldb, talloc_asprintf(ac, "objectclass: out of memory allocating objectclass list")); - talloc_free(mem_ctx); - return LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR; - } - current->objectclass = (const char *)objectclass_element->values[i].data; + /* modify dn */ + msg->dn = ac->orig_req->op.mod.message->dn; - /* this is the root of the tree. We will start - * looking for subclasses from here */ - if (ldb_attr_cmp("top", current->objectclass) == 0) { - DLIST_ADD(parent_class, current); - } else { - DLIST_ADD(unsorted, current); - } + ret = objectclass_sort(ac->module, mem_ctx, objectclass_element, &sorted); + if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) { + return ret; } - /* DEBUGGING aid: how many layers are we down now? */ - layer = 0; - do { - layer++; - /* Find all the subclasses of classes in the - * parent_classes. Push them onto the subclass list */ - - /* Ensure we don't bother if there are no unsorted entries left */ - for (current = parent_class; unsorted && current; current = current->next) { - const char **subclasses = ldb_subclass_list(ac->module->ldb, current->objectclass); - - /* Walk the list of possible subclasses in unsorted */ - for (poss_subclass = unsorted; poss_subclass; ) { - struct class_list *next; - - /* Save the next pointer, as the DLIST_ macros will change poss_subclass->next */ - next = poss_subclass->next; - - for (i = 0; subclasses && subclasses[i]; i++) { - if (ldb_attr_cmp(poss_subclass->objectclass, subclasses[i]) == 0) { - DLIST_REMOVE(unsorted, poss_subclass); - DLIST_ADD(subclass, poss_subclass); - - break; - } - } - poss_subclass = next; - } - } - - /* Now push the parent_classes as sorted, we are done with - these. Add to the END of the list by concatenation */ - DLIST_CONCATENATE(sorted, parent_class, struct class_list *); - - /* and now find subclasses of these */ - parent_class = subclass; - subclass = NULL; - - /* If we didn't find any subclasses we will fall out - * the bottom here */ - } while (parent_class); - - /* This shouldn't happen, and would break MMC, but we can't - * afford to loose objectClasses. Perhaps there was no 'top', - * or some other schema error? - * - * Detecting schema errors is the job of the schema module, so - * at this layer we just try not to loose data - */ - DLIST_CONCATENATE(sorted, unsorted, struct class_list *); - /* We must completely replace the existing objectClass entry. * We could do a constrained add/del, but we are meant to be * in a transaction... */ |