summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNils Goroll <nils.goroll@hamburg.de>2008-11-17 00:55:16 +0100
committerMichael Adam <obnox@samba.org>2008-11-25 11:29:40 +0100
commitbf04324592695fd6e711ba25a89d47e1b61fa33e (patch)
tree3a52e808dade5decd75c6e2bf92f155e3b9d9424
parent9d2c2a7a0e9e69c8fa2ce81af79007da0e32605b (diff)
downloadsamba-bf04324592695fd6e711ba25a89d47e1b61fa33e.tar.gz
samba-bf04324592695fd6e711ba25a89d47e1b61fa33e.tar.bz2
samba-bf04324592695fd6e711ba25a89d47e1b61fa33e.zip
[s3]zfsacl: Prevent calling POSIX ACL vfs methods on zfs share.
This is a proposed fix for Bugs #5135 and #5446. Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
-rw-r--r--source3/modules/vfs_zfsacl.c83
1 files changed, 83 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/source3/modules/vfs_zfsacl.c b/source3/modules/vfs_zfsacl.c
index 3688b2386e..650666e921 100644
--- a/source3/modules/vfs_zfsacl.c
+++ b/source3/modules/vfs_zfsacl.c
@@ -212,9 +212,92 @@ static NTSTATUS zfsacl_fset_nt_acl(vfs_handle_struct *handle,
return zfs_set_nt_acl(handle, fsp, security_info_sent, psd);
}
+/* nils.goroll@hamburg.de 2008-06-16 :
+
+ See also
+ - https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5446
+ - http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6688240
+
+ Solaris supports NFSv4 and ZFS ACLs through a common system call, acl(2)
+ with ACE_SETACL / ACE_GETACL / ACE_GETACLCNT, which is being wrapped for
+ use by samba in this module.
+
+ As the acl(2) interface is identical for ZFS and for NFS, this module,
+ vfs_zfsacl, can not only be used for ZFS, but also for sharing NFSv4
+ mounts on Solaris.
+
+ But while "traditional" POSIX DRAFT ACLs (using acl(2) with SETACL
+ / GETACL / GETACLCNT) fail for ZFS, the Solaris NFS client
+ implemets a compatibility wrapper, which will make calls to
+ traditional ACL calls though vfs_solarisacl succeed. As the
+ compatibility wrapper's implementation is (by design) incomplete,
+ we want to make sure that it is never being called.
+
+ As long as Samba does not support an exiplicit method for a module
+ to define conflicting vfs methods, we should override all conflicting
+ methods here.
+
+ For this to work, we need to make sure that this module is initialised
+ *after* vfs_solarisacl
+
+ Function declarations taken from vfs_solarisacl
+*/
+
+SMB_ACL_T zfsacl_fail__sys_acl_get_file(vfs_handle_struct *handle,
+ const char *path_p,
+ SMB_ACL_TYPE_T type)
+{
+ return (SMB_ACL_T)NULL;
+}
+SMB_ACL_T zfsacl_fail__sys_acl_get_fd(vfs_handle_struct *handle,
+ files_struct *fsp,
+ int fd)
+{
+ return (SMB_ACL_T)NULL;
+}
+
+int zfsacl_fail__sys_acl_set_file(vfs_handle_struct *handle,
+ const char *name,
+ SMB_ACL_TYPE_T type,
+ SMB_ACL_T theacl)
+{
+ return(-1);
+}
+
+int zfsacl_fail__sys_acl_set_fd(vfs_handle_struct *handle,
+ files_struct *fsp,
+ int fd, SMB_ACL_T theacl)
+{
+ return(-1);
+}
+
+int zfsacl_fail__sys_acl_delete_def_file(vfs_handle_struct *handle,
+ const char *path)
+{
+ return(-1);
+}
+
/* VFS operations structure */
static vfs_op_tuple zfsacl_ops[] = {
+ /* invalidate conflicting VFS methods */
+ {SMB_VFS_OP(zfsacl_fail__sys_acl_get_file),
+ SMB_VFS_OP_SYS_ACL_GET_FILE,
+ SMB_VFS_LAYER_OPAQUE},
+ {SMB_VFS_OP(zfsacl_fail__sys_acl_get_fd),
+ SMB_VFS_OP_SYS_ACL_GET_FD,
+ SMB_VFS_LAYER_OPAQUE},
+ {SMB_VFS_OP(zfsacl_fail__sys_acl_set_file),
+ SMB_VFS_OP_SYS_ACL_SET_FILE,
+ SMB_VFS_LAYER_OPAQUE},
+ {SMB_VFS_OP(zfsacl_fail__sys_acl_set_fd),
+ SMB_VFS_OP_SYS_ACL_SET_FD,
+ SMB_VFS_LAYER_OPAQUE},
+ {SMB_VFS_OP(zfsacl_fail__sys_acl_delete_def_file),
+ SMB_VFS_OP_SYS_ACL_DELETE_DEF_FILE,
+ SMB_VFS_LAYER_OPAQUE},
+
+ /* actual methods */
{SMB_VFS_OP(zfsacl_fget_nt_acl), SMB_VFS_OP_FGET_NT_ACL,
SMB_VFS_LAYER_OPAQUE},
{SMB_VFS_OP(zfsacl_get_nt_acl), SMB_VFS_OP_GET_NT_ACL,