Added a few example case thingies - called Common Errors.

(This used to be commit 58ed149471289c71f6e562495aef7b4e6ace0ad2)

4 files changed, 119 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/docs/docbook/projdoc/Compiling.xml b/docs/docbook/projdoc/Compiling.xml
index f392efb32b..f7f0a8394d 100644
--- a/docs/docbook/projdoc/Compiling.xml
+++ b/docs/docbook/projdoc/Compiling.xml
@@ -448,4 +448,20 @@ example of what you would not want to see would be:
 		script to make Samba fit into that system.</para></note>
 	</sect2>
 </sect1>
+
+<sect1>
+<title>Common Errors</title>
+
+<para>
+I've compiled Samba-3 from the CVS and the two binaries (smbd and nmbd)
+are very large files (40 Mg and 20 Mg). I've the same result with
+--enable-shared  ?
+</para>
+
+<para>
+Answer: Strip the binaries (or dond't compile with -g).
+</para>
+
+</sect1>
+
 </chapter>
diff --git a/docs/docbook/projdoc/InterdomainTrusts.xml b/docs/docbook/projdoc/InterdomainTrusts.xml
index 416bceca3f..9fe108e4ee 100644
--- a/docs/docbook/projdoc/InterdomainTrusts.xml
+++ b/docs/docbook/projdoc/InterdomainTrusts.xml
@@ -255,6 +255,39 @@ or that suffer regular outages. Network stability and integrity are key concerns
 distributed trusted domains.
 </para>
 
+	<sect2>
+	<title>Tell me about Trust Relationships using Samba</title>
+
+	<para>
+	Like many, I administer multiple LANs connected together using NT trust
+	relationships.  This was implemented about 4 years ago.  I now have the
+	occasion to consider performing this same task again, but this time, I
+	would like to implement it solely through samba - no Microsoft PDCs
+	anywhere.
+	</para>
+
+	<para>
+	I have read documentation on samba.org regarding NT-style trust
+	relationships and am now wondering, can I do what I want to?  I already
+	have successfully implemented 2 samba servers, but they are not PDCs.
+	They merely act as file servers.  I seem to remember, and it appears to
+	be true (according to samba.org) that trust relationships are a
+	challenge.
+	</para>
+
+	<para>
+	Please provide any helpful feedback that you may have.
+	</para>
+
+	<para>
+	These are almost complete in Samba 3.0 snapshots.  The main catch
+	is getting winbindd to be able to allocate uid/gid's for trusted
+	users/groups.  See the updated Samba HOWTO collection for more
+	details.
+	</para>
+
+	</sect2>
+
 </sect1>
 
 </chapter>
diff --git a/docs/docbook/projdoc/Speed.xml b/docs/docbook/projdoc/Speed.xml
index e2ede62ac7..9dd76e887d 100644
--- a/docs/docbook/projdoc/Speed.xml
+++ b/docs/docbook/projdoc/Speed.xml
@@ -219,4 +219,54 @@ performance. Check the sections on the various clients in
 </para>
 
 </sect1>
+
+<sect1>
+<title>Samba performance problem due changing kernel (2.4.20 Linux kernel)</title>
+
+<para>
+Hi everyone. I am running Gentoo on my server and samba 2.2.8a. Recently
+I changed kernel version from linux-2.4.19-gentoo-r10 to
+linux-2.4.20-wolk4.0s. And now I have performance issue with samba. Ok
+many of you will probably say that move to vanilla sources...well I ried
+it too and it didn't work. I have 100mb LAN and two computers (linux +
+Windows2000). Linux server shares directory with DivX files, client
+(windows2000) plays them via LAN. Before when I was running 2.4.19 kernel
+everything was fine, but now movies freezes and stops...I tried moving
+files between server and Windows and it's trerribly slow.
+</para>
+
+<para>
+Grab mii-tool and check the duplex settings on the NIC.
+My guess is that it is a link layer issue, not an application
+layer problem.  Also run ifconfig and verify that the framing
+error, collisions, etc... look normal for ethernet.
+</para>
+
+</sect1>
+
+<sect1>
+<title>Corrupt tdb Files</title>
+
+<para>
+<screen>
+Well today it happend.... our first major troubles using samba. This is
+no complaints but just some questions :-)
+Our samba PDC server has been hosting 3 TB of data to our 500+ users
+[Windows NT/XP]  for the last 3 years using samba, no problem.
+But today all shares went SLOW; very slow. Also the main smbd kept
+spawning new processes so we had 1600+ running smbd's.... ( while
+normally we avg. 250 ).
+It crashed the SUN E3500 cluster twice. After alot of searching I
+decided to rm ./var/locks/*.tbl and YES I was happy again.
+
+Q1) Is there any method of keeping the *.tbl files in top condition or
+how to early detect corruption?
+
+Q2) What I also would like to mention is that the service latency seems
+alot lower then before the locks cleanup, any ideas on keeping it top notch?
+</screen>
+</para>
+
+</sect1>
+
 </chapter>
diff --git a/docs/docbook/projdoc/locking.xml b/docs/docbook/projdoc/locking.xml
index 5d21270e87..6a514b0415 100644
--- a/docs/docbook/projdoc/locking.xml
+++ b/docs/docbook/projdoc/locking.xml
@@ -980,6 +980,26 @@ so far:
 	</para></listitem>
 </itemizedlist>
 
+	<scet2>
+	<title>locking.trb error messages</title>
+
+	<para>
+	<screen>
+	> We are seeing lots of errors in the samba logs like:
+	>
+	>    tdb(/usr/local/samba_2.2.7/var/locks/locking.tdb): rec_read bad magic
+	> 0x4d6f4b61 at offset=36116
+	>
+	> What do these mean?
+	</screen>
+	</para>
+
+	<para>
+	Corrupted tdb.  Stop all instancesd of smbd, delete locking.tdb, restart smbd.
+	</para>
+
+	</sect2>
+
 </sect1>
 
 <sect1>