diff options
| author | Samba Release Account <samba-bugs@samba.org> | 1996-10-25 02:56:06 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Samba Release Account <samba-bugs@samba.org> | 1996-10-25 02:56:06 +0000 |
| commit | 3340bdcca1f4663e344fde589e78d1828ea0f7a5 (patch) | |
| tree | b7c3b6b0b0dda9584f62151ac9e18eaf6bff2fcd /docs/faq/sambafaq-2.html | |
| parent | e010ad006ea1c4754f357951be648b8f45458613 (diff) | |
| download | samba-3340bdcca1f4663e344fde589e78d1828ea0f7a5.tar.gz samba-3340bdcca1f4663e344fde589e78d1828ea0f7a5.tar.bz2 samba-3340bdcca1f4663e344fde589e78d1828ea0f7a5.zip | |
Added faq directory under docs. Translated the whole of the current
FAQ into linuxdoc-sgml format. From now on we can change the file
sambafaq.sgml and then run sgml2txt and sgml2html to generate the
other files. (Home page for linuxdoc-sgml is
http://sunsite.unc.edu/mdw/Linuxdoc-SGML.html. Does cross references
and section management.)
(This used to be commit 2fedc53b4ea38e482fea7e3296637d6e44e031b7)
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/faq/sambafaq-2.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | docs/faq/sambafaq-2.html | 232 |
1 files changed, 232 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/docs/faq/sambafaq-2.html b/docs/faq/sambafaq-2.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..f8e6bc7e9d --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/faq/sambafaq-2.html @@ -0,0 +1,232 @@ +<HTML> +<HEAD> +<TITLE> Samba FAQ: Compiling and installing Samba on a Unix host</TITLE> +</HEAD> +<BODY> +<A HREF="sambafaq-1.html">Previous</A> +<A HREF="sambafaq-3.html">Next</A> +<A HREF="sambafaq.html#toc2">Table of Contents</A> +<HR> +<H2><A NAME="s2">2. Compiling and installing Samba on a Unix host</A></H2> + +<P> +<A NAME="unix_install"></A> +</P> + +<H2><A NAME="ss2.1">2.1 I can't see the Samba server in any browse lists!</A></H2> + +<P> +<A NAME="no_browse"></A> +</P> +<P>*** Until the FAQ can be updated, please check the file: +*** ftp://samba.anu.edu.au/pub/samba/BROWSING.txt +*** for more information on browsing.</P> +<P>If your GUI client does not permit you to select non-browsable +servers, you may need to do so on the command line. For example, under +Lan Manager you might connect to the above service as disk drive M: +thusly:</P> +<P>net use M: \\mary\fred</P> +<P>The details of how to do this and the specific syntax varies from +client to client - check your client's documentation.</P> + + +<H2><A NAME="ss2.2">2.2 Some files that I KNOW are on the server doesn't show up when I</A>view the files from my client!</H2> + +<P> +<A NAME="missing_files"></A> +</P> + + +<H2><A NAME="ss2.3">2.3 Some files on the server show up with really wierd filenames when</A>I view the files from my client!</H2> + +<P> +<A NAME="strange_filenames"></A> +</P> +<P>If you check what files are not showing up, you will note that they +are files which contain upper case letters or which are otherwise not +DOS-compatible (ie, they are not legal DOS filenames for some reason).</P> +<P>The Samba server can be configured either to ignore such files +completely, or to present them to the client in "mangled" form. If you +are not seeing the files at all, the Samba server has most likely been +configured to ignore them. Consult the man page smb.conf(5) for +details of how to change this - the parameter you need to set is +"mangled names = yes".</P> + + +<H2><A NAME="ss2.4">2.4 My client reports "cannot locate specified computer" or similar</A></H2> + +<P> +<A NAME="cant_see_server"></A> +</P> +<P>This indicates one of three things: You supplied an incorrect server +name, the underlying TCP/IP layer is not working correctly, or the +name you specified cannot be resolved.</P> +<P>After carefully checking that the name you typed is the name you +should have typed, try doing things like pinging a host or telnetting +to somewhere on your network to see if TCP/IP is functioning OK. If it +is, the problem is most likely name resolution.</P> +<P>If your client has a facility to do so, hardcode a mapping between the +hosts IP and the name you want to use. For example, with Man Manager +or Windows for Workgroups you would put a suitable entry in the file +LMHOSTS. If this works, the problem is in the communication between +your client and the netbios name server. If it does not work, then +there is something fundamental wrong with your naming and the solution +is beyond the scope of this document.</P> +<P>If you do not have any server on your subnet supplying netbios name +resolution, hardcoded mappings are your only option. If you DO have a +netbios name server running (such as the Samba suite's nmbd program), +the problem probably lies in the way it is set up. Refer to Section +Two of this FAQ for more ideas.</P> +<P>By the way, remember to REMOVE the hardcoded mapping before further +tests :-) </P> + + +<H2><A NAME="ss2.5">2.5 My client reports "cannot locate specified share name" or</A>similar</H2> + +<P> +<A NAME="cant_see_share"></A> +</P> +<P>This message indicates that your client CAN locate the specified +server, which is a good start, but that it cannot find a service of +the name you gave.</P> +<P>The first step is to check the exact name of the service you are +trying to connect to (consult your system administrator). Assuming it +exists and you specified it correctly (read your client's doco on how +to specify a service name correctly), read on:</P> +<P>* Many clients cannot accept or use service names longer than +eight +characters. +* Many clients cannot accept or use service names containing +spaces. +* Some servers (not Samba though) are case sensitive with service +names. +* Some clients force service names into upper case.</P> + + +<H2><A NAME="ss2.6">2.6 My client reports "cannot find domain controller", "cannot log</A>on to the network" or similar </H2> + +<P> +<A NAME="cant_see_net"></A> +</P> +<P>Nothing is wrong - Samba does not implement the primary domain name +controller stuff for several reasons, including the fact that the +whole concept of a primary domain controller and "logging in to a +network" doesn't fit well with clients possibly running on multiuser +machines (such as users of smbclient under Unix). Having said that, +several developers are working hard on building it in to the next +major version of Samba. If you can contribute, send a message to +samba-bugs!</P> +<P>Seeing this message should not affect your ability to mount redirected +disks and printers, which is really what all this is about.</P> +<P>For many clients (including Windows for Workgroups and Lan Manager), +setting the domain to STANDALONE at least gets rid of the message.</P> + + +<H2><A NAME="ss2.7">2.7 Printing doesn't work :-(</A></H2> + +<P> +<A NAME="no_printing"></A> +</P> +<P>Make sure that the specified print command for the service you are +connecting to is correct and that it has a fully-qualified path (eg., +use "/usr/bin/lpr" rather than just "lpr").</P> +<P>Make sure that the spool directory specified for the service is +writable by the user connected to the service. In particular the user +"nobody" often has problems with printing, even if it worked with an +earlier version of Samba. Try creating another guest user other than +"nobody".</P> +<P>Make sure that the user specified in the service is permitted to use +the printer.</P> +<P>Check the debug log produced by smbd. Search for the printer name and +see if the log turns up any clues. Note that error messages to do with +a service ipc$ are meaningless - they relate to the way the client +attempts to retrieve status information when using the LANMAN1 +protocol.</P> +<P>If using WfWg then you need to set the default protocol to TCP/IP, not +Netbeui. This is a WfWg bug.</P> +<P>If using the Lanman1 protocol (the default) then try switching to +coreplus. Also not that print status error messages don't mean +printing won't work. The print status is received by a different +mechanism.</P> + + +<H2><A NAME="ss2.8">2.8 My programs install on the server OK, but refuse to work properly</A></H2> + +<P> +<A NAME="programs_wont_run"></A> +</P> +<P>There are numerous possible reasons for this, but one MAJOR +possibility is that your software uses locking. Make sure you are +using Samba 1.6.11 or later. It may also be possible to work around +the problem by setting "locking=no" in the Samba configuration file +for the service the software is installed on. This should be regarded +as a strictly temporary solution.</P> +<P>In earlier Samba versions there were some difficulties with the very +latest Microsoft products, particularly Excel 5 and Word for Windows +6. These should have all been solved. If not then please let Andrew +Tridgell know.</P> + + +<H2><A NAME="ss2.9">2.9 My "server string" doesn't seem to be recognised</A></H2> + +<P> +<A NAME="bad_server_string"></A> +</P> +<P>my client reports the default setting, eg. "Samba 1.9.15p4", instead +of what I have changed it to in the smb.conf file.</P> +<P>You need to use the -C option in nmbd. The "server string" affects +what smbd puts out and -C affects what nmbd puts out. In a future +version these will probably be combined and -C will be removed, but +for now use -C</P> + + +<H2><A NAME="ss2.10">2.10 My client reports "This server is not configured to list shared</A>resources" </H2> + +<P> +<A NAME="cant_list_shares"></A> +</P> +<P>Your guest account is probably invalid for some reason. Samba uses the +guest account for browsing in smbd. Check that your guest account is +valid.</P> +<P>See also 'guest account' in smb.conf man page.</P> + + +<H2><A NAME="ss2.11">2.11 Log message "you appear to have a trapdoor uid system" </A></H2> + +<P> +<A NAME="trapdoor_uid"></A> +</P> +<P>This can have several causes. It might be because you are using a uid +or gid of 65535 or -1. This is a VERY bad idea, and is a big security +hole. Check carefully in your /etc/passwd file and make sure that no +user has uid 65535 or -1. Especially check the "nobody" user, as many +broken systems are shipped with nobody setup with a uid of 65535.</P> +<P>It might also mean that your OS has a trapdoor uid/gid system :-)</P> +<P>This means that once a process changes effective uid from root to +another user it can't go back to root. Unfortunately Samba relies on +being able to change effective uid from root to non-root and back +again to implement its security policy. If your OS has a trapdoor uid +system this won't work, and several things in Samba may break. Less +things will break if you use user or server level security instead of +the default share level security, but you may still strike +problems.</P> +<P>The problems don't give rise to any security holes, so don't panic, +but it does mean some of Samba's capabilities will be unavailable. +In particular you will not be able to connect to the Samba server as +two different uids at once. This may happen if you try to print as a +"guest" while accessing a share as a normal user. It may also affect +your ability to list the available shares as this is normally done as +the guest user.</P> +<P>Complain to your OS vendor and ask them to fix their system.</P> +<P>Note: the reason why 65535 is a VERY bad choice of uid and gid is that +it casts to -1 as a uid, and the setreuid() system call ignores (with +no error) uid changes to -1. This means any daemon attempting to run +as uid 65535 will actually run as root. This is not good!</P> + + +<HR> +<A HREF="sambafaq-1.html">Previous</A> +<A HREF="sambafaq-3.html">Next</A> +<A HREF="sambafaq.html#toc2">Table of Contents</A> +</BODY> +</HTML> |