summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/examples
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMichael Adam <obnox@samba.org>2008-08-05 18:42:07 +0200
committerMichael Adam <obnox@samba.org>2008-08-13 11:54:06 +0200
commited6692964768fd14d1b6c3378e40e23c68e9dd63 (patch)
tree21067bd759f670fd939315471811bdb6ed2cf77b /examples
parentfd070dc9af61677789cbe0d4464428ac68858b3a (diff)
downloadsamba-ed6692964768fd14d1b6c3378e40e23c68e9dd63.tar.gz
samba-ed6692964768fd14d1b6c3378e40e23c68e9dd63.tar.bz2
samba-ed6692964768fd14d1b6c3378e40e23c68e9dd63.zip
dbwrap ctdb: release the lock before calling ctdbd_persistent_store()
in the persistent db_ctdb_store operation. This is to prevent deadlocks in db_ctdb_persistent_store(). There is a tradeoff: Usually, the record is still locked after db->store operation. This lock is usually released via the talloc destructor with the TALLOC_FREE to the record. So we have two choices: - Either re-lock the record after the call to persistent_store or cancel_persistent update and this way not changing any assumptions callers may have about the state, but possibly introducing new race conditions. - Or don't lock the record again but just remove the talloc_destructor. This is less racy but assumes that the lock is always released via TALLOC_FREE of the record. I choose the first variant for now since it seems less racy. We can't guarantee that we succeed in getting the lock anyways. The only real danger here is that a caller performs multiple store operations after a fetch_locked() which is currently not the case. Michael (This used to be commit d004c9a7281d2577c3ba2012c8f790cc198ea700)
Diffstat (limited to 'examples')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions