summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/pidl
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>2013-03-21 13:47:07 -0700
committerDavid Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org>2013-03-22 20:10:11 +0100
commit84dad60672aa5fdc0ff20f5fb8471d5209174063 (patch)
tree314fed87469f79619ad6ef06d72dffe968f99d39 /pidl
parent566a2e6828bb5d6ea3a35e24938675a296bbe95b (diff)
downloadsamba-84dad60672aa5fdc0ff20f5fb8471d5209174063.tar.gz
samba-84dad60672aa5fdc0ff20f5fb8471d5209174063.tar.bz2
samba-84dad60672aa5fdc0ff20f5fb8471d5209174063.zip
Fix bug #9733 - smbcontrol close-share is not working.
As part of forcibly disconnecting a client from a share, smbd must atomically call reload_services() to ensure that the entry in the ServicePtrs[] array corresponding to that share is removed if the share was removed from the smb.conf or registry entries. Otherwise the ServicePtrs[] array entry for the share remains active and the client races to auto-reconnect to the share before a second message to reload the smb.conf file can be sent. This has to be done as part of the close-share message processing, as removing the share from the smb.conf file first, then telling the smbd to reload followed by the forcible disconnect message doesn't work as in this sequence of events when the reload message is received the client is still connected to the share, so the ServicePtrs[] entry is still left active. The forcible-disconnect + service reload has to be done together as an atomic operation in order for this to work. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org> Reviewed-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org> Autobuild-User(master): David Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org> Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Mar 22 20:10:11 CET 2013 on sn-devel-104
Diffstat (limited to 'pidl')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions