summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/source3/auth/auth_sam.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAndrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>2004-01-05 23:22:00 +0000
committerAndrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>2004-01-05 23:22:00 +0000
commit5cf546c4cd1f01e852587a2717182d8d399db90e (patch)
treed22962c0ab9bf6b73a47999d7d94d696a10174d7 /source3/auth/auth_sam.c
parent1ba7740fd61ff7e10e5efe6a9e4d2a8c669fc82e (diff)
downloadsamba-5cf546c4cd1f01e852587a2717182d8d399db90e.tar.gz
samba-5cf546c4cd1f01e852587a2717182d8d399db90e.tar.bz2
samba-5cf546c4cd1f01e852587a2717182d8d399db90e.zip
(merge from 3.0)
Refactor our authentication and authentication testing code. The next move will be to remove our password checking code from the SAM authentication backend, and into a file where other parts of samba can use it. The ntlm_auth changes provide for better use of common code. Andrew Bartlett (This used to be commit 0d97b10248347398fbee66767baac0c7adf6889d)
Diffstat (limited to 'source3/auth/auth_sam.c')
-rw-r--r--source3/auth/auth_sam.c367
1 files changed, 219 insertions, 148 deletions
diff --git a/source3/auth/auth_sam.c b/source3/auth/auth_sam.c
index 7352a9685b..04b587343a 100644
--- a/source3/auth/auth_sam.c
+++ b/source3/auth/auth_sam.c
@@ -141,96 +141,129 @@ static BOOL smb_pwd_check_ntlmv2(const DATA_BLOB *ntv2_response,
return (memcmp(value_from_encryption, client_response, 16) == 0);
}
-/****************************************************************************
- Do a specific test for an smb password being correct, given a smb_password and
- the lanman and NT responses.
-****************************************************************************/
-
-static NTSTATUS sam_password_ok(const struct auth_context *auth_context,
- TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx,
- SAM_ACCOUNT *sampass,
- const auth_usersupplied_info *user_info,
- DATA_BLOB *user_sess_key,
- DATA_BLOB *lm_sess_key)
+/**
+ * Check a challenge-response password against the value of the NT or
+ * LM password hash.
+ *
+ * @param mem_ctx talloc context
+ * @param challenge 8-byte challenge. If all zero, forces plaintext comparison
+ * @param nt_response 'unicode' NT response to the challenge, or unicode password
+ * @param lm_response ASCII or LANMAN response to the challenge, or password in DOS code page
+ * @param username internal Samba username, for log messages
+ * @param client_username username the client used
+ * @param client_domain domain name the client used (may be mapped)
+ * @param nt_pw MD4 unicode password from our passdb or similar
+ * @param lm_pw LANMAN ASCII password from our passdb or similar
+ * @param user_sess_key User session key
+ * @param lm_sess_key LM session key (first 8 bytes of the LM hash)
+ */
+
+static NTSTATUS ntlm_password_check(TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx,
+ const DATA_BLOB *challenge,
+ const DATA_BLOB *lm_response,
+ const DATA_BLOB *nt_response,
+ const char *username,
+ const char *client_username,
+ const char *client_domain,
+ const uint8 *lm_pw, const uint8 *nt_pw,
+ DATA_BLOB *user_sess_key,
+ DATA_BLOB *lm_sess_key)
{
- uint16 acct_ctrl;
- const uint8 *nt_pw, *lm_pw;
- uint32 auth_flags;
-
- acct_ctrl = pdb_get_acct_ctrl(sampass);
- if (acct_ctrl & ACB_PWNOTREQ) {
- if (lp_null_passwords()) {
- DEBUG(3,("Account for user '%s' has no password and null passwords are allowed.\n", pdb_get_username(sampass)));
- return(NT_STATUS_OK);
- } else {
- DEBUG(3,("Account for user '%s' has no password and null passwords are NOT allowed.\n", pdb_get_username(sampass)));
- return(NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE);
- }
+ static const unsigned char zeros[8];
+ if (nt_pw == NULL) {
+ DEBUG(3,("sam_password_ok: NO NT password stored for user %s.\n",
+ username));
}
- auth_flags = user_info->auth_flags;
+ /* Check for cleartext netlogon. Used by Exchange 5.5. */
+ if (challenge->length == sizeof(zeros) &&
+ (memcmp(challenge->data, zeros, challenge->length) == 0 )) {
- if (IS_SAM_DEFAULT(sampass, PDB_NTPASSWD)) {
- DEBUG(3,("sam_password_ok: NO NT password stored for user %s.\n",
- pdb_get_username(sampass)));
- /* No return, we want to check the LM hash below in this case */
- auth_flags &= (~(AUTH_FLAG_NTLMv2_RESP | AUTH_FLAG_NTLM_RESP));
- } else {
- /* Check for cleartext netlogon. Used by Exchange 5.5. */
- unsigned char zeros[8];
-
- memset(zeros,'\0',sizeof(zeros));
- if (auth_context->challenge.length == sizeof(zeros) &&
- (memcmp(auth_context->challenge.data, zeros, auth_context->challenge.length) == 0 ) &&
- user_info->nt_resp.length) {
- if ((nt_pw = pdb_get_nt_passwd(sampass)) != NULL) {
- unsigned char pwhash[16];
- mdfour(pwhash, user_info->nt_resp.data, user_info->nt_resp.length);
- if (memcmp(pwhash, nt_pw, sizeof(pwhash)) == 0) {
- return NT_STATUS_OK;
- }
+ DEBUG(4,("sam_password_ok: checking plaintext passwords for user %s\n",
+ username));
+ if (nt_pw && nt_response->length) {
+ unsigned char pwhash[16];
+ mdfour(pwhash, nt_response->data, nt_response->length);
+ if (memcmp(pwhash, nt_pw, sizeof(pwhash)) == 0) {
+ return NT_STATUS_OK;
+ } else {
+ DEBUG(3,("sam_password_ok: NT (Unicode) plaintext password check failed for user %s\n",
+ username));
+ return NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD;
+ }
+
+ } else if (!lp_lanman_auth()) {
+ DEBUG(3,("sam_password_ok: (plaintext password check) LANMAN passwords NOT PERMITTED for user %s\n",
+ username));
+
+ } else if (lm_pw && lm_response->length) {
+ uchar dospwd[14];
+ uchar p16[16];
+ ZERO_STRUCT(dospwd);
+
+ DEBUG(100, ("DOS password: %s\n"));
+ memcpy(dospwd, lm_response->data, MIN(lm_response->length, sizeof(dospwd)));
+ /* Only the fisrt 14 chars are considered, password need not be null terminated. */
+ E_P16((const unsigned char *)dospwd, p16);
+
+ dump_data_pw("DOS password (first buffer)\n", dospwd, 14);
+ dump_data_pw("DOS password (wire DES hash)\n", p16, 16);
+ dump_data_pw("DOS password (passdb DES hash)\n", lm_pw, 16);
+ if (memcmp(p16, lm_pw, sizeof(p16)) == 0) {
+ return NT_STATUS_OK;
+ } else {
+ DEBUG(3,("sam_password_ok: LANMAN (ASCII) plaintext password check failed for user %s\n",
+ username));
+ return NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD;
}
+ } else {
+ DEBUG(3, ("Plaintext authentication for user %s attempted, but neither NT nor LM passwords available\n", username));
+ return NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD;
}
}
+
+ if (nt_response->length != 0 && nt_response->length < 24) {
+ DEBUG(2,("sam_password_ok: invalid NT password length (%lu) for user %s\n",
+ (unsigned long)nt_response->length, username));
+ }
- if (auth_flags & AUTH_FLAG_NTLMv2_RESP) {
- nt_pw = pdb_get_nt_passwd(sampass);
- /* We have the NT MD4 hash challenge available - see if we can
- use it (ie. does it exist in the smbpasswd file).
- */
- DEBUG(4,("sam_password_ok: Checking NTLMv2 password with domain [%s]\n", user_info->client_domain.str));
- if (smb_pwd_check_ntlmv2( &user_info->nt_resp,
- nt_pw, &auth_context->challenge,
- user_info->smb_name.str,
- user_info->client_domain.str,
- user_sess_key)) {
- return NT_STATUS_OK;
+ if (nt_response->length >= 24 && nt_pw) {
+ if (nt_response->length > 24) {
+ /* We have the NT MD4 hash challenge available - see if we can
+ use it (ie. does it exist in the smbpasswd file).
+ */
+ DEBUG(4,("sam_password_ok: Checking NTLMv2 password with domain [%s]\n", client_domain));
+ if (smb_pwd_check_ntlmv2( nt_response,
+ nt_pw, challenge,
+ client_username,
+ client_domain,
+ user_sess_key)) {
+ return NT_STATUS_OK;
+ }
+
+ DEBUG(4,("sam_password_ok: Checking NTLMv2 password without a domain\n"));
+ if (smb_pwd_check_ntlmv2( nt_response,
+ nt_pw, challenge,
+ client_username,
+ "",
+ user_sess_key)) {
+ return NT_STATUS_OK;
+ } else {
+ DEBUG(3,("sam_password_ok: NTLMv2 password check failed\n"));
+ return NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD;
+ }
}
- DEBUG(4,("sam_password_ok: Checking NTLMv2 password without a domain\n"));
- if (smb_pwd_check_ntlmv2( &user_info->nt_resp,
- nt_pw, &auth_context->challenge,
- user_info->smb_name.str,
- "",
- user_sess_key)) {
- return NT_STATUS_OK;
- } else {
- DEBUG(3,("sam_password_ok: NTLMv2 password check failed\n"));
- return NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD;
- }
- } else if (auth_flags & AUTH_FLAG_NTLM_RESP) {
if (lp_ntlm_auth()) {
- nt_pw = pdb_get_nt_passwd(sampass);
/* We have the NT MD4 hash challenge available - see if we can
use it (ie. does it exist in the smbpasswd file).
*/
DEBUG(4,("sam_password_ok: Checking NT MD4 password\n"));
- if (smb_pwd_check_ntlmv1(&user_info->nt_resp,
- nt_pw, &auth_context->challenge,
+ if (smb_pwd_check_ntlmv1(nt_response,
+ nt_pw, challenge,
user_sess_key)) {
/* The LM session key for this response is not very secure,
so use it only if we otherwise allow LM authentication */
- lm_pw = pdb_get_lanman_passwd(sampass);
if (lp_lanman_auth() && lm_pw) {
uint8 first_8_lm_hash[16];
@@ -240,104 +273,142 @@ static NTSTATUS sam_password_ok(const struct auth_context *auth_context,
}
return NT_STATUS_OK;
} else {
- DEBUG(3,("sam_password_ok: NT MD4 password check failed for user %s\n",pdb_get_username(sampass)));
+ DEBUG(3,("sam_password_ok: NT MD4 password check failed for user %s\n",
+ username));
return NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD;
}
} else {
- DEBUG(2,("sam_password_ok: NTLMv1 passwords NOT PERMITTED for user %s\n",pdb_get_username(sampass)));
+ DEBUG(2,("sam_password_ok: NTLMv1 passwords NOT PERMITTED for user %s\n",
+ username));
/* no return, becouse we might pick up LMv2 in the LM field */
}
}
- if (auth_flags & AUTH_FLAG_LM_RESP) {
- if (user_info->lm_resp.length != 24) {
- DEBUG(2,("sam_password_ok: invalid LanMan password length (%lu) for user %s\n",
- (unsigned long)user_info->nt_resp.length, pdb_get_username(sampass)));
- }
+ if (lm_response->length == 0) {
+ DEBUG(3,("sam_password_ok: NEITHER LanMan nor NT password supplied for user %s\n",
+ username));
+ return NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD;
+ }
+
+ if (lm_response->length < 24) {
+ DEBUG(2,("sam_password_ok: invalid LanMan password length (%lu) for user %s\n",
+ (unsigned long)nt_response->length, username));
+ return NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD;
+ }
- if (!lp_lanman_auth()) {
- DEBUG(3,("sam_password_ok: Lanman passwords NOT PERMITTED for user %s\n",pdb_get_username(sampass)));
- } else if (IS_SAM_DEFAULT(sampass, PDB_LMPASSWD)) {
- DEBUG(3,("sam_password_ok: NO LanMan password set for user %s (and no NT password supplied)\n",pdb_get_username(sampass)));
- } else {
- lm_pw = pdb_get_lanman_passwd(sampass);
-
- DEBUG(4,("sam_password_ok: Checking LM password\n"));
- if (smb_pwd_check_ntlmv1(&user_info->lm_resp,
- lm_pw, &auth_context->challenge,
- NULL)) {
+ if (!lp_lanman_auth()) {
+ DEBUG(3,("sam_password_ok: Lanman passwords NOT PERMITTED for user %s\n",
+ username));
+ } else if (!lm_pw) {
+ DEBUG(3,("sam_password_ok: NO LanMan password set for user %s (and no NT password supplied)\n",
+ username));
+ } else {
+ DEBUG(4,("sam_password_ok: Checking LM password\n"));
+ if (smb_pwd_check_ntlmv1(lm_response,
+ lm_pw, challenge,
+ NULL)) {
+ uint8 first_8_lm_hash[16];
+ memcpy(first_8_lm_hash, lm_pw, 8);
+ memset(first_8_lm_hash + 8, '\0', 8);
+ *user_sess_key = data_blob(first_8_lm_hash, 16);
+ *lm_sess_key = data_blob(first_8_lm_hash, 16);
+ return NT_STATUS_OK;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (!nt_pw) {
+ DEBUG(4,("sam_password_ok: LM password check failed for user, no NT password %s\n",username));
+ return NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD;
+ }
+
+ /* This is for 'LMv2' authentication. almost NTLMv2 but limited to 24 bytes.
+ - related to Win9X, legacy NAS pass-though authentication
+ */
+ DEBUG(4,("sam_password_ok: Checking LMv2 password with domain %s\n", client_domain));
+ if (smb_pwd_check_ntlmv2( lm_response,
+ nt_pw, challenge,
+ client_username,
+ client_domain,
+ NULL)) {
+ return NT_STATUS_OK;
+ }
+
+ DEBUG(4,("sam_password_ok: Checking LMv2 password without a domain\n"));
+ if (smb_pwd_check_ntlmv2( lm_response,
+ nt_pw, challenge,
+ client_username,
+ "",
+ NULL)) {
+ return NT_STATUS_OK;
+ }
+
+ /* Apparently NT accepts NT responses in the LM field
+ - I think this is related to Win9X pass-though authentication
+ */
+ DEBUG(4,("sam_password_ok: Checking NT MD4 password in LM field\n"));
+ if (lp_ntlm_auth()) {
+ if (smb_pwd_check_ntlmv1(lm_response,
+ nt_pw, challenge,
+ NULL)) {
+ /* The session key for this response is still very odd.
+ It not very secure, so use it only if we otherwise
+ allow LM authentication */
+
+ if (lp_lanman_auth() && lm_pw) {
uint8 first_8_lm_hash[16];
memcpy(first_8_lm_hash, lm_pw, 8);
memset(first_8_lm_hash + 8, '\0', 8);
*user_sess_key = data_blob(first_8_lm_hash, 16);
*lm_sess_key = data_blob(first_8_lm_hash, 16);
- return NT_STATUS_OK;
}
- }
-
- if (IS_SAM_DEFAULT(sampass, PDB_NTPASSWD)) {
- DEBUG(4,("sam_password_ok: LM password check failed for user, no NT password %s\n",pdb_get_username(sampass)));
- return NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD;
- }
-
- nt_pw = pdb_get_nt_passwd(sampass);
-
- /* This is for 'LMv2' authentication. almost NTLMv2 but limited to 24 bytes.
- - related to Win9X, legacy NAS pass-though authentication
- */
- DEBUG(4,("sam_password_ok: Checking LMv2 password with domain %s\n", user_info->client_domain.str));
- if (smb_pwd_check_ntlmv2( &user_info->lm_resp,
- nt_pw, &auth_context->challenge,
- user_info->smb_name.str,
- user_info->client_domain.str,
- NULL)) {
return NT_STATUS_OK;
}
+ DEBUG(3,("sam_password_ok: LM password, NT MD4 password in LM field and LMv2 failed for user %s\n",username));
+ } else {
+ DEBUG(3,("sam_password_ok: LM password and LMv2 failed for user %s, and NT MD4 password in LM field not permitted\n",username));
+ }
+ return NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD;
+}
- DEBUG(4,("sam_password_ok: Checking LMv2 password without a domain\n"));
- if (smb_pwd_check_ntlmv2( &user_info->lm_resp,
- nt_pw, &auth_context->challenge,
- user_info->smb_name.str,
- "",
- NULL)) {
- return NT_STATUS_OK;
- }
+/****************************************************************************
+ Do a specific test for an smb password being correct, given a smb_password and
+ the lanman and NT responses.
+****************************************************************************/
- /* Apparently NT accepts NT responses in the LM field
- - I think this is related to Win9X pass-though authentication
- */
- DEBUG(4,("sam_password_ok: Checking NT MD4 password in LM field\n"));
- if (lp_ntlm_auth()) {
- if (smb_pwd_check_ntlmv1(&user_info->lm_resp,
- nt_pw, &auth_context->challenge,
- NULL)) {
- /* The session key for this response is still very odd.
- It not very secure, so use it only if we otherwise
- allow LM authentication */
- lm_pw = pdb_get_lanman_passwd(sampass);
-
- if (lp_lanman_auth() && lm_pw) {
- uint8 first_8_lm_hash[16];
- memcpy(first_8_lm_hash, lm_pw, 8);
- memset(first_8_lm_hash + 8, '\0', 8);
- *user_sess_key = data_blob(first_8_lm_hash, 16);
- *lm_sess_key = data_blob(first_8_lm_hash, 16);
- }
- return NT_STATUS_OK;
- }
- DEBUG(3,("sam_password_ok: LM password, NT MD4 password in LM field and LMv2 failed for user %s\n",pdb_get_username(sampass)));
- return NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD;
+static NTSTATUS sam_password_ok(const struct auth_context *auth_context,
+ TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx,
+ SAM_ACCOUNT *sampass,
+ const auth_usersupplied_info *user_info,
+ DATA_BLOB *user_sess_key,
+ DATA_BLOB *lm_sess_key)
+{
+ uint16 acct_ctrl;
+ const uint8 *lm_pw, *nt_pw;
+ const char *username = pdb_get_username(sampass);
+
+ acct_ctrl = pdb_get_acct_ctrl(sampass);
+ if (acct_ctrl & ACB_PWNOTREQ) {
+ if (lp_null_passwords()) {
+ DEBUG(3,("Account for user '%s' has no password and null passwords are allowed.\n", username));
+ return NT_STATUS_OK;
} else {
- DEBUG(3,("sam_password_ok: LM password and LMv2 failed for user %s, and NT MD4 password in LM field not permitted\n",pdb_get_username(sampass)));
- return NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD;
- }
+ DEBUG(3,("Account for user '%s' has no password and null passwords are NOT allowed.\n", username));
+ return NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE;
+ }
}
-
- /* Should not be reached, but if they send nothing... */
- DEBUG(3,("sam_password_ok: NEITHER LanMan nor NT password supplied for user %s\n",pdb_get_username(sampass)));
- return NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD;
+
+ lm_pw = pdb_get_lanman_passwd(sampass);
+ nt_pw = pdb_get_nt_passwd(sampass);
+
+ return ntlm_password_check(mem_ctx, &auth_context->challenge,
+ &user_info->lm_resp, &user_info->nt_resp,
+ username,
+ user_info->smb_name.str,
+ user_info->client_domain.str,
+ lm_pw, nt_pw, user_sess_key, lm_sess_key);
}
+
/****************************************************************************
Do a specific test for a SAM_ACCOUNT being vaild for this connection
(ie not disabled, expired and the like).