1) updated ipc.c NetUserGetInfo - load \\%L\%U instead of \\%L\HOMES

   because the share must be browseable by a w95 client

2) send_mailslot_reply - unique or group datagram argument added.

3) netlogon.c - rewrote response packet to do the right thing for w95.

4) server.c reply_nt1() - added OEMDomainstring to the end.

5) (deep breath) reworked the nmbd-browsing code a little bit.
   i discovered two months ago that becoming a primary domain controller
   (and domain master browser) is done independently of becoming a
   backup domain controller (logon server) is done independently of
   becoming a local master browser.

   therefore, three sets of state-machines (instead of just one) are in
   place - each of which is responsible for taking samba through the
   required stages to become:  a logon server; a domain master browser;
   and a local master browser.

   each of these three things can occur independently on each interface,
   _including_ the wins pseudo-interface.  the only slight caveat is that
   the wins pseudo-interface, by virtue of _not_ being a broadcast
   interface, does _not_ register as a local master browser with the wins
   server, as this doesn't make sense.

lkcl
(This used to be commit 88c6a00c3c1b430307f512986185b5ed7aea7181)

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/source3/namepacket.c b/source3/namepacket.c
index e62f3f00b0..e31d423784 100644
--- a/source3/namepacket.c
+++ b/source3/namepacket.c
@@ -559,7 +559,7 @@ void listen_for_packets(BOOL run_election)
   Note that this currently sends all answers to port 138. thats the
   wrong things to do! I should send to the requestors port. XXX
   **************************************************************************/
-BOOL send_mailslot_reply(char *mailslot,int fd,char *buf,int len,char *srcname,
+BOOL send_mailslot_reply(BOOL unique, char *mailslot,int fd,char *buf,int len,char *srcname,
 			 char *dstname,int src_type,int dest_type,
 			 struct in_addr dest_ip,struct in_addr src_ip)
 {
@@ -576,7 +576,8 @@ BOOL send_mailslot_reply(char *mailslot,int fd,char *buf,int len,char *srcname,
 
   update_name_trn_id();
 
-  dgram->header.msg_type = 0x11; /* DIRECT GROUP DATAGRAM */
+  /* DIRECT GROUP or UNIQUE datagram */
+  dgram->header.msg_type = unique ? 0x10 : 0x11; 
   dgram->header.flags.node_type = M_NODE;
   dgram->header.flags.first = True;
   dgram->header.flags.more = False;