summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/source3/nmbd/nmbd_nameregister.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAndrew Tridgell <tridge@samba.org>2002-06-27 14:37:17 +0000
committerAndrew Tridgell <tridge@samba.org>2002-06-27 14:37:17 +0000
commit223ddc3f2daf25b16ce60230336747d5fab61e39 (patch)
tree66fc3123346244d5cc7b0dd47274b214fa1d104d /source3/nmbd/nmbd_nameregister.c
parent675a108c65834f9402d967926b30e50e811843c1 (diff)
downloadsamba-223ddc3f2daf25b16ce60230336747d5fab61e39.tar.gz
samba-223ddc3f2daf25b16ce60230336747d5fab61e39.tar.bz2
samba-223ddc3f2daf25b16ce60230336747d5fab61e39.zip
The next phase in the WINS rewrite!
We now cope wiith multiple WINS groups and multiple failover servers for release and refresh as well as registration. We also do the regitrations in the same fashion as W2K does, where we don't try to register the next IP in the list for a name until the WINS server has acked the previos IP. This prevents us flooding the WINS server and also seems to make for much more reliable multi-homed registration. I also changed the dead WINS server code to mark pairs of IPs dead, not individual IPs. The idea is that a WINS server might be dead from the point of view of one of our interfaces, but not another, so we need to keep talking to it on one while moving onto a failover WINS server on the other interface. This copes much better with partial LAN outages and weird routing tables. (This used to be commit 313f2c9ff7a513802e4f893324865e70912d419e)
Diffstat (limited to 'source3/nmbd/nmbd_nameregister.c')
-rw-r--r--source3/nmbd/nmbd_nameregister.c539
1 files changed, 301 insertions, 238 deletions
diff --git a/source3/nmbd/nmbd_nameregister.c b/source3/nmbd/nmbd_nameregister.c
index 91b6f8b190..4ac5473d4a 100644
--- a/source3/nmbd/nmbd_nameregister.c
+++ b/source3/nmbd/nmbd_nameregister.c
@@ -25,6 +25,10 @@
extern fstring global_myworkgroup;
+/* forward declarations */
+static void wins_next_registration(struct response_record *rrec);
+
+
/****************************************************************************
Deal with a response packet when registering one of our names.
****************************************************************************/
@@ -32,127 +36,131 @@ extern fstring global_myworkgroup;
static void register_name_response(struct subnet_record *subrec,
struct response_record *rrec, struct packet_struct *p)
{
- /*
- * If we are registering broadcast, then getting a response is an
- * error - we do not have the name. If we are registering unicast,
- * then we expect to get a response.
- */
-
- struct nmb_packet *nmb = &p->packet.nmb;
- BOOL bcast = nmb->header.nm_flags.bcast;
- BOOL success = True;
- struct nmb_name *question_name = &rrec->packet->packet.nmb.question.question_name;
- struct nmb_name *answer_name = &nmb->answers->rr_name;
- int ttl = 0;
- uint16 nb_flags = 0;
- struct in_addr registered_ip;
-
- /* Sanity check. Ensure that the answer name in the incoming packet is the
- same as the requested name in the outgoing packet. */
-
- if(!question_name || !answer_name)
- {
- DEBUG(0,("register_name_response: malformed response (%s is NULL).\n",
- question_name ? "question_name" : "answer_name" ));
- return;
- }
-
- if(!nmb_name_equal(question_name, answer_name))
- {
- DEBUG(0,("register_name_response: Answer name %s differs from question \
-name %s.\n", nmb_namestr(answer_name), nmb_namestr(question_name)));
- return;
- }
-
- if(bcast)
- {
- /*
- * Special hack to cope with old Samba nmbd's.
- * Earlier versions of Samba (up to 1.9.16p11) respond
- * to a broadcast name registration of WORKGROUP<1b> when
- * they should not. Hence, until these versions are gone,
- * we should treat such errors as success for this particular
- * case only. jallison@whistle.com.
- */
+ /*
+ * If we are registering broadcast, then getting a response is an
+ * error - we do not have the name. If we are registering unicast,
+ * then we expect to get a response.
+ */
+
+ struct nmb_packet *nmb = &p->packet.nmb;
+ BOOL bcast = nmb->header.nm_flags.bcast;
+ BOOL success = True;
+ struct nmb_name *question_name = &rrec->packet->packet.nmb.question.question_name;
+ struct nmb_name *answer_name = &nmb->answers->rr_name;
+ struct nmb_packet *sent_nmb = &rrec->packet->packet.nmb;
+ int ttl = 0;
+ uint16 nb_flags = 0;
+ struct in_addr register_ip;
+ fstring reg_name;
+
+ putip(&register_ip,&sent_nmb->additional->rdata[2]);
+ fstrcpy(reg_name, inet_ntoa(register_ip));
+
+ if (subrec == unicast_subnet) {
+ /* we know that this wins server is definately alive - for the moment! */
+ wins_srv_alive(rrec->packet->ip, register_ip);
+ }
+
+ /* Sanity check. Ensure that the answer name in the incoming packet is the
+ same as the requested name in the outgoing packet. */
+
+ if(!question_name || !answer_name) {
+ DEBUG(0,("register_name_response: malformed response (%s is NULL).\n",
+ question_name ? "question_name" : "answer_name" ));
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if(!nmb_name_equal(question_name, answer_name)) {
+ DEBUG(0,("register_name_response: Answer name %s differs from question name %s.\n",
+ nmb_namestr(answer_name), nmb_namestr(question_name)));
+ return;
+ }
+ if(bcast) {
+ /*
+ * Special hack to cope with old Samba nmbd's.
+ * Earlier versions of Samba (up to 1.9.16p11) respond
+ * to a broadcast name registration of WORKGROUP<1b> when
+ * they should not. Hence, until these versions are gone,
+ * we should treat such errors as success for this particular
+ * case only. jallison@whistle.com.
+ */
+
#if 1 /* OLD_SAMBA_SERVER_HACK */
- if((nmb->header.rcode == ACT_ERR) && strequal(global_myworkgroup, answer_name->name) &&
- (answer_name->name_type == 0x1b))
- {
- /* Pretend we did not get this. */
- rrec->num_msgs--;
-
- DEBUG(5,("register_name_response: Ignoring broadcast response to \
-registration of name %s due to old Samba server bug.\n", nmb_namestr(answer_name)));
- return;
- }
+ if((nmb->header.rcode == ACT_ERR) && strequal(global_myworkgroup, answer_name->name) &&
+ (answer_name->name_type == 0x1b)) {
+ /* Pretend we did not get this. */
+ rrec->num_msgs--;
+
+ DEBUG(5,("register_name_response: Ignoring broadcast response to registration of name %s due to old Samba server bug.\n",
+ nmb_namestr(answer_name)));
+ return;
+ }
#endif /* OLD_SAMBA_SERVER_HACK */
- /* Someone else has the name. Log the problem. */
- DEBUG(1,("register_name_response: Failed to register \
-name %s on subnet %s via broadcast. Error code was %d. Reject came from IP %s\n",
- nmb_namestr(answer_name),
- subrec->subnet_name, nmb->header.rcode, inet_ntoa(p->ip)));
- success = False;
- }
- else
- {
- /* Unicast - check to see if the response allows us to have the name. */
- if(nmb->header.rcode != 0)
- {
- /* Error code - we didn't get the name. */
- success = False;
-
- DEBUG(0,("register_name_response: server at IP %s rejected our \
-name registration of %s with error code %d.\n", inet_ntoa(p->ip),
- nmb_namestr(answer_name), nmb->header.rcode));
-
- }
- else if(nmb->header.opcode == NMB_WACK_OPCODE)
- {
- /* WINS server is telling us to wait. Pretend we didn't get
- the response but don't send out any more register requests. */
-
- DEBUG(5,("register_name_response: WACK from WINS server %s in registering \
-name %s on subnet %s.\n", inet_ntoa(p->ip), nmb_namestr(answer_name), subrec->subnet_name));
-
- rrec->repeat_count = 0;
- /* How long we should wait for. */
- rrec->repeat_time = p->timestamp + nmb->answers->ttl;
- rrec->num_msgs--;
- return;
- }
- else
- {
- success = True;
- /* Get the data we need to pass to the success function. */
- nb_flags = get_nb_flags(nmb->answers->rdata);
- putip((char*)&registered_ip,&nmb->answers->rdata[2]);
- ttl = nmb->answers->ttl;
- }
- }
-
- DEBUG(5,("register_name_response: %s in registering name %s on subnet %s.\n",
- success ? "success" : "failure", nmb_namestr(answer_name), subrec->subnet_name));
-
- if(success)
- {
- /* Enter the registered name into the subnet name database before calling
- the success function. */
- standard_success_register(subrec, rrec->userdata, answer_name, nb_flags, ttl, registered_ip);
- if( rrec->success_fn)
- (*(register_name_success_function)rrec->success_fn)(subrec, rrec->userdata, answer_name, nb_flags, ttl, registered_ip);
- }
- else
- {
- if( rrec->fail_fn)
- (*(register_name_fail_function)rrec->fail_fn)(subrec, rrec, question_name);
- /* Remove the name. */
- standard_fail_register( subrec, rrec, question_name);
- }
-
- /* Ensure we don't retry. */
- remove_response_record(subrec, rrec);
+ /* Someone else has the name. Log the problem. */
+ DEBUG(1,("register_name_response: Failed to register name %s IP %s on subnet %s via broadcast. Error code was %d. Reject came from IP %s\n",
+ nmb_namestr(answer_name),
+ reg_name,
+ subrec->subnet_name, nmb->header.rcode, inet_ntoa(p->ip)));
+ success = False;
+ } else {
+ /* Unicast - check to see if the response allows us to have the name. */
+ if(nmb->header.rcode != 0) {
+ /* Error code - we didn't get the name. */
+ success = False;
+
+ DEBUG(0,("register_name_response: %sserver at IP %s rejected our name registration of %s IP %s with error code %d.\n",
+ subrec==unicast_subnet?"WINS ":"",
+ inet_ntoa(p->ip),
+ nmb_namestr(answer_name),
+ reg_name,
+ nmb->header.rcode));
+ } else if (nmb->header.opcode == NMB_WACK_OPCODE) {
+ /* WINS server is telling us to wait. Pretend we didn't get
+ the response but don't send out any more register requests. */
+
+ DEBUG(5,("register_name_response: WACK from WINS server %s in registering name %s IP %s\n",
+ inet_ntoa(p->ip), nmb_namestr(answer_name), reg_name));
+
+ rrec->repeat_count = 0;
+ /* How long we should wait for. */
+ rrec->repeat_time = p->timestamp + nmb->answers->ttl;
+ rrec->num_msgs--;
+ return;
+ } else {
+ success = True;
+ /* Get the data we need to pass to the success function. */
+ nb_flags = get_nb_flags(nmb->answers->rdata);
+ ttl = nmb->answers->ttl;
+
+ /* send off a registration for the next IP, if any */
+ wins_next_registration(rrec);
+ }
+ }
+
+ DEBUG(5,("register_name_response: %s in registering %sname %s IP %s with %s.\n",
+ success ? "success" : "failure",
+ subrec==unicast_subnet?"WINS ":"",
+ nmb_namestr(answer_name),
+ reg_name,
+ inet_ntoa(rrec->packet->ip)));
+
+ if(success) {
+ /* Enter the registered name into the subnet name database before calling
+ the success function. */
+ standard_success_register(subrec, rrec->userdata, answer_name, nb_flags, ttl, register_ip);
+ if( rrec->success_fn)
+ (*(register_name_success_function)rrec->success_fn)(subrec, rrec->userdata, answer_name, nb_flags, ttl, register_ip);
+ } else {
+ if( rrec->fail_fn)
+ (*(register_name_fail_function)rrec->fail_fn)(subrec, rrec, question_name);
+ /* Remove the name. */
+ standard_fail_register( subrec, rrec, question_name);
+ }
+
+ /* Ensure we don't retry. */
+ remove_response_record(subrec, rrec);
}
@@ -163,49 +171,68 @@ static void wins_registration_timeout(struct subnet_record *subrec,
struct response_record *rrec)
{
struct userdata_struct *userdata = rrec->userdata;
+ struct nmb_packet *sent_nmb = &rrec->packet->packet.nmb;
+ struct nmb_name *nmbname = &sent_nmb->question.question_name;
+ struct in_addr register_ip;
+ fstring src_addr;
- DEBUG(2,("register_name_timeout_response: WINS server at address %s is not responding.\n",
- inet_ntoa(rrec->packet->ip)));
+ putip(&register_ip,&sent_nmb->additional->rdata[2]);
+
+ fstrcpy(src_addr, inet_ntoa(register_ip));
+
+ DEBUG(2,("wins_registration_timeout: WINS server %s timed out registering IP %s\n",
+ inet_ntoa(rrec->packet->ip), src_addr));
- /* mark it temporarily dead */
- wins_srv_died(rrec->packet->ip);
+ /* mark it temporarily dead for this source address */
+ wins_srv_died(rrec->packet->ip, register_ip);
/* if we have some userdata then use that to work out what
wins server to try next */
if (userdata) {
const char *tag = (const char *)userdata->data;
- struct nmb_packet *sent_nmb = &rrec->packet->packet.nmb;
- struct nmb_name *nmbname = &sent_nmb->question.question_name;
- /* and try the next wins server in our failover list */
- rrec->packet->ip = wins_srv_ip_tag(tag);
+ /* try the next wins server in our failover list for
+ this tag */
+ rrec->packet->ip = wins_srv_ip_tag(tag, register_ip);
+ }
- /* also update the UNICODE subnet IPs */
- subrec->bcast_ip = subrec->mask_ip = subrec->myip = rrec->packet->ip;
+ /* if we have run out of wins servers for this tag then they
+ must all have timed out. We treat this as *success*, not
+ failure, and go into our standard name refresh mode. This
+ copes with all the wins servers being down */
+ if (wins_srv_is_dead(rrec->packet->ip, register_ip)) {
+ uint16 nb_flags = get_nb_flags(sent_nmb->additional->rdata);
+ int ttl = sent_nmb->additional->ttl;
+
+ standard_success_register(subrec, userdata, nmbname, nb_flags, ttl, register_ip);
+ if(rrec->success_fn) {
+ (*(register_name_success_function)rrec->success_fn)(subrec,
+ rrec->userdata,
+ nmbname,
+ nb_flags,
+ ttl,
+ register_ip);
+ }
- DEBUG(6,("Retrying register of name %s with WINS server %s using tag '%s'\n",
- nmb_namestr(nmbname), inet_ntoa(rrec->packet->ip), tag));
- }
+ /* send off a registration for the next IP, if any */
+ wins_next_registration(rrec);
- /* Keep trying to contact the WINS server periodically. This allows
- us to work correctly if the WINS server is down temporarily when
- we come up. */
+ /* don't need to send this packet any more */
+ remove_response_record(subrec, rrec);
+ return;
+ }
- /* Reset the number of attempts to zero and double the interval between
- retries. Max out at 5 minutes. */
- rrec->repeat_count = 3;
- rrec->repeat_interval *= 2;
- if(rrec->repeat_interval > (5 * 60))
- rrec->repeat_interval = (5 * 60);
- rrec->repeat_time = time(NULL) + rrec->repeat_interval;
+ /* we will be moving to the next WINS server for this group,
+ send it immediately */
+ rrec->repeat_count = 2;
+ rrec->repeat_time = time(NULL) + 1;
rrec->in_expiration_processing = False;
-
- DEBUG(5,("register_name_timeout_response: increasing WINS timeout to %d seconds.\n",
- (int)rrec->repeat_interval));
+
+ DEBUG(6,("Retrying register of name %s IP %s with WINS server %s\n",
+ nmb_namestr(nmbname), src_addr, inet_ntoa(rrec->packet->ip)));
/* notice that we don't remove the response record. This keeps
- us trying to register with each of our failover wins
- servers until we succeed */
+ us trying to register with each of our failover wins servers */
}
@@ -241,13 +268,9 @@ static void register_name_timeout_response(struct subnet_record *subrec,
putip(&registered_ip,&sent_nmb->additional->rdata[2]);
}
} else {
- /* Unicast - if no responses then it's an error. */
- if(rrec->num_msgs == 0) {
- wins_registration_timeout(subrec, rrec);
- return;
- }
-
- /* we got responses, but timed out?? bizarre. Treat it as failure. */
+ /* wins timeouts are special */
+ wins_registration_timeout(subrec, rrec);
+ return;
}
DEBUG(5,("register_name_timeout_response: %s in registering name %s on subnet %s.\n",
@@ -281,7 +304,8 @@ static void multihomed_register_one(struct nmb_name *nmbname,
const char *tag)
{
struct userdata_struct *userdata;
- struct in_addr wins_ip = wins_srv_ip_tag(tag);
+ struct in_addr wins_ip = wins_srv_ip_tag(tag, ip);
+ fstring ip_str;
userdata = (struct userdata_struct *)malloc(sizeof(*userdata) + strlen(tag) + 1);
if (!userdata) {
@@ -292,8 +316,10 @@ static void multihomed_register_one(struct nmb_name *nmbname,
userdata->userdata_len = strlen(tag) + 1;
strlcpy(userdata->data, tag, userdata->userdata_len);
- DEBUG(6,("Registering name %s with WINS server %s using tag '%s'\n",
- nmb_namestr(nmbname), inet_ntoa(wins_ip), tag));
+ fstrcpy(ip_str, inet_ntoa(ip));
+
+ DEBUG(6,("Registering name %s IP %s with WINS server %s using tag '%s'\n",
+ nmb_namestr(nmbname), ip_str, inet_ntoa(wins_ip), tag));
if (queue_register_multihomed_name(unicast_subnet,
register_name_response,
@@ -308,14 +334,65 @@ static void multihomed_register_one(struct nmb_name *nmbname,
DEBUG(0,("multihomed_register_one: Failed to send packet trying to register name %s IP %s\n",
nmb_namestr(nmbname), inet_ntoa(ip)));
}
+
+ free(userdata);
+}
+
+
+/****************************************************************************
+we have finished the registration of one IP and need to see if we have
+any more IPs left to register with this group of wins server for this name
+****************************************************************************/
+static void wins_next_registration(struct response_record *rrec)
+{
+ struct nmb_packet *sent_nmb = &rrec->packet->packet.nmb;
+ struct nmb_name *nmbname = &sent_nmb->question.question_name;
+ uint16 nb_flags = get_nb_flags(sent_nmb->additional->rdata);
+ struct userdata_struct *userdata = rrec->userdata;
+ const char *tag;
+ struct in_addr last_ip;
+ struct subnet_record *subrec;
+
+ putip(&last_ip,&sent_nmb->additional->rdata[2]);
+
+ if (!userdata) {
+ /* it wasn't multi-homed */
+ return;
+ }
+
+ tag = (const char *)userdata->data;
+
+ for (subrec = FIRST_SUBNET; subrec; subrec = NEXT_SUBNET_EXCLUDING_UNICAST(subrec)) {
+ if (ip_equal(last_ip, subrec->myip)) {
+ subrec = NEXT_SUBNET_EXCLUDING_UNICAST(subrec);
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (!subrec) {
+ /* no more to do! */
+ return;
+ }
+
+ switch (sent_nmb->header.opcode) {
+ case NMB_NAME_MULTIHOMED_REG_OPCODE:
+ multihomed_register_one(nmbname, nb_flags, NULL, NULL, subrec->myip, tag);
+ break;
+ case NMB_NAME_REFRESH_OPCODE_8:
+ queue_wins_refresh(nmbname,
+ register_name_response,
+ register_name_timeout_response,
+ nb_flags, subrec->myip, tag);
+ break;
+ }
}
/****************************************************************************
Try and register one of our names on the unicast subnet - multihomed.
****************************************************************************/
-static BOOL multihomed_register_name( struct nmb_name *nmbname, uint16 nb_flags,
- register_name_success_function success_fn,
- register_name_fail_function fail_fn)
+static void multihomed_register_name(struct nmb_name *nmbname, uint16 nb_flags,
+ register_name_success_function success_fn,
+ register_name_fail_function fail_fn)
{
/*
If we are adding a group name, we just send multiple
@@ -338,16 +415,16 @@ static BOOL multihomed_register_name( struct nmb_name *nmbname, uint16 nb_flags,
*/
int num_ips=0;
int i, t;
- struct in_addr *ip_list = NULL;
struct subnet_record *subrec;
char **wins_tags;
+ struct in_addr *ip_list;
for(subrec = FIRST_SUBNET; subrec; subrec = NEXT_SUBNET_EXCLUDING_UNICAST(subrec) )
num_ips++;
if((ip_list = (struct in_addr *)malloc(num_ips * sizeof(struct in_addr)))==NULL) {
DEBUG(0,("multihomed_register_name: malloc fail !\n"));
- return True;
+ return;
}
for (subrec = FIRST_SUBNET, i = 0;
@@ -356,106 +433,92 @@ static BOOL multihomed_register_name( struct nmb_name *nmbname, uint16 nb_flags,
ip_list[i] = subrec->myip;
}
- (void)add_name_to_subnet( unicast_subnet, nmbname->name, nmbname->name_type,
- nb_flags, lp_max_ttl(), SELF_NAME,
- num_ips, ip_list);
+ add_name_to_subnet(unicast_subnet, nmbname->name, nmbname->name_type,
+ nb_flags, lp_max_ttl(), SELF_NAME,
+ num_ips, ip_list);
/* get the list of wins tags - we try to register for each of them */
wins_tags = wins_srv_tags();
- /* Now try and register the name, num_ips times for each wins tag. */
- for (t=0; wins_tags[t]; t++) {
- for (i = 0; i < num_ips; i++) {
- multihomed_register_one(nmbname, nb_flags,
- success_fn, fail_fn,
- ip_list[i],
- wins_tags[t]);
- }
+ /* Now try and register the name for each wins tag. Note that
+ at this point we only register our first IP with each wins
+ group. We will register the rest from
+ wins_next_registration() when we get the reply for this
+ one. That follows the way W2K does things (tridge)
+ */
+ for (t=0; wins_tags && wins_tags[t]; t++) {
+ multihomed_register_one(nmbname, nb_flags,
+ success_fn, fail_fn,
+ ip_list[0],
+ wins_tags[t]);
}
wins_srv_tags_free(wins_tags);
SAFE_FREE(ip_list);
-
- return False;
}
+
/****************************************************************************
Try and register one of our names.
****************************************************************************/
-
-BOOL register_name(struct subnet_record *subrec,
+void register_name(struct subnet_record *subrec,
char *name, int type, uint16 nb_flags,
register_name_success_function success_fn,
register_name_fail_function fail_fn,
struct userdata_struct *userdata)
{
- struct nmb_name nmbname;
-
- make_nmb_name(&nmbname, name, type);
-
- /* Always set the NB_ACTIVE flag on the name we are
- registering. Doesn't make sense without it.
- */
-
- nb_flags |= NB_ACTIVE;
-
- /* If this is the unicast subnet, and we are a multi-homed
- host, then register a multi-homed name. */
-
- if( (subrec == unicast_subnet) && we_are_multihomed()) {
- return multihomed_register_name(&nmbname, nb_flags,
- success_fn, fail_fn);
- }
-
- if(queue_register_name( subrec,
- register_name_response,
- register_name_timeout_response,
- success_fn,
- fail_fn,
- userdata,
- &nmbname,
- nb_flags) == NULL)
- {
- DEBUG(0,("register_name: Failed to send packet trying to register name %s\n",
- nmb_namestr(&nmbname)));
- return True;
- }
- return False;
+ struct nmb_name nmbname;
+
+ make_nmb_name(&nmbname, name, type);
+
+ /* Always set the NB_ACTIVE flag on the name we are
+ registering. Doesn't make sense without it.
+ */
+
+ nb_flags |= NB_ACTIVE;
+
+ if (subrec == unicast_subnet) {
+ /* we now always do multi-homed registration if we are
+ registering to a WINS server. This copes much
+ better with complex WINS setups */
+ multihomed_register_name(&nmbname, nb_flags,
+ success_fn, fail_fn);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (queue_register_name(subrec,
+ register_name_response,
+ register_name_timeout_response,
+ success_fn,
+ fail_fn,
+ userdata,
+ &nmbname,
+ nb_flags) == NULL) {
+ DEBUG(0,("register_name: Failed to send packet trying to register name %s\n",
+ nmb_namestr(&nmbname)));
+ }
}
+
/****************************************************************************
- Try and refresh one of our names.
+ Try and refresh one of our names. This is *only* called for WINS refresh
****************************************************************************/
-
-BOOL refresh_name(struct subnet_record *subrec, struct name_record *namerec,
- refresh_name_success_function success_fn,
- refresh_name_fail_function fail_fn,
- struct userdata_struct *userdata)
+void wins_refresh_name(struct name_record *namerec)
{
- int i;
-
- /*
- * Go through and refresh the name for all known ip addresses.
- * Only call the success/fail function on the last one (it should
- * only be done once).
- */
-
- for( i = 0; i < namerec->data.num_ips; i++)
- {
- if(queue_refresh_name( subrec,
- register_name_response,
- register_name_timeout_response,
- (i == (namerec->data.num_ips - 1)) ? success_fn : NULL,
- (i == (namerec->data.num_ips - 1)) ? fail_fn : NULL,
- (i == (namerec->data.num_ips - 1)) ? userdata : NULL,
- namerec,
- namerec->data.ip[i]) == NULL)
- {
- DEBUG(0,("refresh_name: Failed to send packet trying to refresh name %s\n",
- nmb_namestr(&namerec->name)));
- return True;
- }
- }
- return False;
+ int t;
+ char **wins_tags;
+
+ /* get the list of wins tags - we try to refresh for each of them */
+ wins_tags = wins_srv_tags();
+
+ for (t=0; wins_tags && wins_tags[t]; t++) {
+ queue_wins_refresh(&namerec->name,
+ register_name_response,
+ register_name_timeout_response,
+ namerec->data.nb_flags,
+ namerec->data.ip[0], wins_tags[t]);
+ }
+
+ wins_srv_tags_free(wins_tags);
}