diff options
| author | Björn Baumbach <bb@sernet.de> | 2011-07-18 14:09:50 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org> | 2011-07-18 23:27:55 +0200 |
| commit | d29f8491bdc3e04e4644c7ad0d0ef79c6f1affc3 (patch) | |
| tree | 6e591948457d2d1e7d5efa851a55ff417839142f /source3 | |
| parent | 8f7b7d7aa2eb1eb27eb7c90c7056d46d198634d4 (diff) | |
| download | samba-d29f8491bdc3e04e4644c7ad0d0ef79c6f1affc3.tar.gz samba-d29f8491bdc3e04e4644c7ad0d0ef79c6f1affc3.tar.bz2 samba-d29f8491bdc3e04e4644c7ad0d0ef79c6f1affc3.zip | |
s3-torture: run_locktest5(): replace cli_lock() with cli_lock32()
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'source3')
| -rw-r--r-- | source3/torture/torture.c | 26 |
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/source3/torture/torture.c b/source3/torture/torture.c index 22d9b13927..39d7ad3005 100644 --- a/source3/torture/torture.c +++ b/source3/torture/torture.c @@ -2126,23 +2126,25 @@ static bool run_locktest5(int dummy) } /* Check for NT bug... */ - ret = cli_lock(cli1, fnum1, 0, 8, 0, READ_LOCK) && - cli_lock(cli1, fnum3, 0, 1, 0, READ_LOCK); + ret = NT_STATUS_IS_OK(cli_lock32(cli1, fnum1, 0, 8, 0, READ_LOCK)) && + NT_STATUS_IS_OK(cli_lock32(cli1, fnum3, 0, 1, 0, READ_LOCK)); cli_close(cli1, fnum1); cli_open(cli1, fname, O_RDWR, DENY_NONE, &fnum1); - ret = cli_lock(cli1, fnum1, 7, 1, 0, WRITE_LOCK); + status = cli_lock32(cli1, fnum1, 7, 1, 0, WRITE_LOCK); + ret = NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status); EXPECTED(ret, True); printf("this server %s the NT locking bug\n", ret ? "doesn't have" : "has"); cli_close(cli1, fnum1); cli_open(cli1, fname, O_RDWR, DENY_NONE, &fnum1); cli_unlock(cli1, fnum3, 0, 1); - ret = cli_lock(cli1, fnum1, 0, 4, 0, WRITE_LOCK) && - cli_lock(cli1, fnum1, 1, 1, 0, READ_LOCK); + ret = NT_STATUS_IS_OK(cli_lock32(cli1, fnum1, 0, 4, 0, WRITE_LOCK)) && + NT_STATUS_IS_OK(cli_lock32(cli1, fnum1, 1, 1, 0, READ_LOCK)); EXPECTED(ret, True); printf("the same process %s overlay a write with a read lock\n", ret?"can":"cannot"); - ret = cli_lock(cli2, fnum2, 0, 4, 0, READ_LOCK); + status = cli_lock32(cli2, fnum2, 0, 4, 0, READ_LOCK); + ret = NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status); EXPECTED(ret, False); printf("a different processs %s get a read lock on the first process lock stack\n", ret?"can":"cannot"); @@ -2150,7 +2152,8 @@ static bool run_locktest5(int dummy) /* Unlock the process 2 lock. */ cli_unlock(cli2, fnum2, 0, 4); - ret = cli_lock(cli1, fnum3, 0, 4, 0, READ_LOCK); + status = cli_lock32(cli1, fnum3, 0, 4, 0, READ_LOCK); + ret = NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status); EXPECTED(ret, False); printf("the same processs on a different fnum %s get a read lock\n", ret?"can":"cannot"); @@ -2159,8 +2162,8 @@ static bool run_locktest5(int dummy) cli_unlock(cli1, fnum3, 0, 4); /* Stack 2 more locks here. */ - ret = cli_lock(cli1, fnum1, 0, 4, 0, READ_LOCK) && - cli_lock(cli1, fnum1, 0, 4, 0, READ_LOCK); + ret = NT_STATUS_IS_OK(cli_lock32(cli1, fnum1, 0, 4, 0, READ_LOCK)) && + NT_STATUS_IS_OK(cli_lock32(cli1, fnum1, 0, 4, 0, READ_LOCK)); EXPECTED(ret, True); printf("the same process %s stack read locks\n", ret?"can":"cannot"); @@ -2169,7 +2172,7 @@ static bool run_locktest5(int dummy) removed. */ ret = NT_STATUS_IS_OK(cli_unlock(cli1, fnum1, 0, 4)) && - cli_lock(cli2, fnum2, 0, 4, 0, READ_LOCK); + NT_STATUS_IS_OK(cli_lock32(cli2, fnum2, 0, 4, 0, READ_LOCK)); EXPECTED(ret, True); printf("the first unlock removes the %s lock\n", ret?"WRITE":"READ"); @@ -2192,7 +2195,8 @@ static bool run_locktest5(int dummy) printf("the same process %s count the lock stack\n", !ret?"can":"cannot"); /* Ensure connection 2 can get a write lock. */ - ret = cli_lock(cli2, fnum2, 0, 4, 0, WRITE_LOCK); + status = cli_lock32(cli2, fnum2, 0, 4, 0, WRITE_LOCK); + ret = NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status); EXPECTED(ret, True); printf("a different processs %s get a write lock on the unlocked stack\n", ret?"can":"cannot"); |