summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/extended_dn_store.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAndrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>2009-11-05 17:04:10 +1100
committerAndrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>2009-11-12 16:34:04 +1100
commitf0d43e9e562bfd7c254a9b2446fb11f85186b45e (patch)
tree08c4a939a51fa0625e3d99302eec1847f729ecb8 /source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/extended_dn_store.c
parent973197cd9ded571ff02996cb5c133435a35976c5 (diff)
downloadsamba-f0d43e9e562bfd7c254a9b2446fb11f85186b45e.tar.gz
samba-f0d43e9e562bfd7c254a9b2446fb11f85186b45e.tar.bz2
samba-f0d43e9e562bfd7c254a9b2446fb11f85186b45e.zip
s4:dsdb Use new dsdb_dn code in LDB modules and Samba4 schema
This converts the code from using the binary DN code in ldb_dn to using a special Samba-specfic wrapper around ldb_dn. We also use the dsdb_dn code for DN+Binary and DN+String comparisons (changed from treating them as Binary blobs) Andrew Bartlett
Diffstat (limited to 'source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/extended_dn_store.c')
-rw-r--r--source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/extended_dn_store.c81
1 files changed, 49 insertions, 32 deletions
diff --git a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/extended_dn_store.c b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/extended_dn_store.c
index 122a9bb2b7..ef8532c82a 100644
--- a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/extended_dn_store.c
+++ b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/extended_dn_store.c
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
ldb database library
Copyright (C) Simo Sorce 2005-2008
- Copyright (C) Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> 2007-2008
+ Copyright (C) Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> 2007-2009
This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@
struct extended_dn_replace_list {
struct extended_dn_replace_list *next;
- struct ldb_dn *dn;
+ struct dsdb_dn *dsdb_dn;
TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx;
struct ldb_val *replace_dn;
struct extended_dn_context *ac;
@@ -157,12 +157,20 @@ static int extended_replace_dn(struct ldb_request *req, struct ldb_reply *ares)
* search. We can't check, as it could be an extended
* DN, so a module below will resolve it */
struct ldb_dn *dn = ares->message->dn;
-
- /* Replace the DN with the extended version of the DN
- * (ie, add SID and GUID) */
- *os->replace_dn = data_blob_string_const(
- ldb_dn_get_extended_linearized(os->mem_ctx,
- dn, 1));
+
+ /* Rebuild with the string or binary 'extra part' the
+ * DN may have had as a prefix */
+ struct dsdb_dn *dsdb_dn = dsdb_dn_construct(ares, dn,
+ os->dsdb_dn->extra_part,
+ os->dsdb_dn->oid);
+ if (dsdb_dn) {
+ /* Replace the DN with the extended version of the DN
+ * (ie, add SID and GUID) */
+ *os->replace_dn = data_blob_string_const(
+ dsdb_dn_get_extended_linearized(os->mem_ctx,
+ dsdb_dn, 1));
+ talloc_free(dsdb_dn);
+ }
if (os->replace_dn->data == NULL) {
return ldb_module_done(os->ac->req, NULL, NULL,
LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR);
@@ -209,7 +217,9 @@ static int extended_replace_dn(struct ldb_request *req, struct ldb_reply *ares)
static int extended_store_replace(struct extended_dn_context *ac,
TALLOC_CTX *callback_mem_ctx,
- struct ldb_val *plain_dn)
+ struct ldb_val *plain_dn,
+ bool is_delete,
+ const char *oid)
{
int ret;
struct extended_dn_replace_list *os;
@@ -228,14 +238,25 @@ static int extended_store_replace(struct extended_dn_context *ac,
os->mem_ctx = callback_mem_ctx;
- os->dn = ldb_dn_from_ldb_val(os, ldb_module_get_ctx(ac->module), plain_dn);
- if (!os->dn || !ldb_dn_validate(os->dn)) {
+ os->dsdb_dn = dsdb_dn_parse(os, ldb_module_get_ctx(ac->module), plain_dn, oid);
+ if (!os->dsdb_dn || !ldb_dn_validate(os->dsdb_dn->dn)) {
talloc_free(os);
ldb_asprintf_errstring(ldb_module_get_ctx(ac->module),
- "could not parse %.*s as a DN", (int)plain_dn->length, plain_dn->data);
+ "could not parse %.*s as a %s DN", (int)plain_dn->length, plain_dn->data,
+ oid);
return LDB_ERR_INVALID_DN_SYNTAX;
}
+ if (is_delete && !ldb_dn_has_extended(os->dsdb_dn->dn)) {
+ /* NO need to figure this DN out, this element is
+ * going to be deleted anyway, and becuase it's not
+ * extended, we have enough information to do the
+ * delete */
+ talloc_free(os);
+ return LDB_SUCCESS;
+ }
+
+
os->replace_dn = plain_dn;
/* The search request here might happen to be for an
@@ -243,7 +264,7 @@ static int extended_store_replace(struct extended_dn_context *ac,
* module in the stack will convert this into a normal DN for
* processing */
ret = ldb_build_search_req(&os->search_req,
- ldb_module_get_ctx(ac->module), os, os->dn, LDB_SCOPE_BASE, NULL,
+ ldb_module_get_ctx(ac->module), os, os->dsdb_dn->dn, LDB_SCOPE_BASE, NULL,
attrs, NULL, os, extended_replace_dn,
ac->req);
@@ -302,9 +323,8 @@ static int extended_dn_add(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request *req)
continue;
}
- /* We only setup an extended DN GUID on these particular DN objects */
- if (strcmp(schema_attr->attributeSyntax_oid, "2.5.5.1") != 0 &&
- strcmp(schema_attr->attributeSyntax_oid, "2.5.5.7") != 0) {
+ /* We only setup an extended DN GUID on DN elements */
+ if (dsdb_dn_oid_to_format(schema_attr->syntax->ldap_oid) == DSDB_INVALID_DN) {
continue;
}
@@ -324,14 +344,15 @@ static int extended_dn_add(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request *req)
/* Re-calculate el */
el = &ac->new_req->op.add.message->elements[i];
for (j = 0; j < el->num_values; j++) {
- ret = extended_store_replace(ac, ac->new_req->op.add.message->elements, &el->values[j]);
+ ret = extended_store_replace(ac, ac->new_req->op.add.message->elements, &el->values[j],
+ false, schema_attr->syntax->ldap_oid);
if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) {
return ret;
}
}
}
- /* if DNs were set continue */
+ /* if no DNs were set continue */
if (ac->ops == NULL) {
talloc_free(ac);
return ldb_next_request(module, req);
@@ -377,11 +398,10 @@ static int extended_dn_modify(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request *req
}
/* We only setup an extended DN GUID on these particular DN objects */
- if (strcmp(schema_attr->attributeSyntax_oid, "2.5.5.1") != 0 &&
- strcmp(schema_attr->attributeSyntax_oid, "2.5.5.7") != 0) {
+ if (dsdb_dn_oid_to_format(schema_attr->syntax->ldap_oid) == DSDB_INVALID_DN) {
continue;
}
-
+
/* Before we setup a procedure to modify the incoming message, we must copy it */
if (!ac->new_req) {
struct ldb_message *msg = ldb_msg_copy(ac, req->op.mod.message);
@@ -399,17 +419,14 @@ static int extended_dn_modify(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request *req
el = &ac->new_req->op.mod.message->elements[i];
/* For each value being added, we need to setup the lookups to fill in the extended DN */
for (j = 0; j < el->num_values; j++) {
- struct ldb_dn *dn = ldb_dn_from_ldb_val(ac, ldb_module_get_ctx(module), &el->values[j]);
- if (!dn || !ldb_dn_validate(dn)) {
- ldb_asprintf_errstring(ldb_module_get_ctx(module),
- "could not parse attribute %s as a DN", el->name);
- return LDB_ERR_INVALID_DN_SYNTAX;
- }
- if (((el->flags & LDB_FLAG_MOD_MASK) == LDB_FLAG_MOD_DELETE) && !ldb_dn_has_extended(dn)) {
- /* NO need to figure this DN out, it's going to be deleted anyway */
- continue;
- }
- ret = extended_store_replace(ac, req->op.mod.message->elements, &el->values[j]);
+ /* If we are just going to delete this
+ * element, only do a lookup if
+ * extended_store_replace determines it's an
+ * input of an extended DN */
+ bool is_delete = ((el->flags & LDB_FLAG_MOD_MASK) == LDB_FLAG_MOD_DELETE);
+
+ ret = extended_store_replace(ac, req->op.mod.message->elements, &el->values[j],
+ is_delete, schema_attr->syntax->ldap_oid);
if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) {
return ret;
}