summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/password_hash.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorSimo Sorce <idra@samba.org>2006-05-29 23:46:43 +0000
committerGerald (Jerry) Carter <jerry@samba.org>2007-10-10 14:08:43 -0500
commit0c7b82e5f6063de4114de21cf854ac67346e31f6 (patch)
treecc66c4f23e7029eae3be6edaf09d194d71016d47 /source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/password_hash.c
parent787d67c2cd780656cb5e6c0884c485f287b72c49 (diff)
downloadsamba-0c7b82e5f6063de4114de21cf854ac67346e31f6.tar.gz
samba-0c7b82e5f6063de4114de21cf854ac67346e31f6.tar.bz2
samba-0c7b82e5f6063de4114de21cf854ac67346e31f6.zip
r15942: Remove the sync internal ldb calls altogether.
This means that some modules have been disabled as well as they have not been ported to the async interface One of them is the ugly objectclass module. I hope that the change in samldb module will make the MMC happy without the need of this crappy module, we need proper handling in a decent schema module. proxy and ldb_map have also been disabled ldb_sqlite3 need to be ported as well (currenlty just broken). (This used to be commit 51083de795bdcbf649de926e86969adc20239b6d)
Diffstat (limited to 'source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/password_hash.c')
-rw-r--r--source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/password_hash.c721
1 files changed, 18 insertions, 703 deletions
diff --git a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/password_hash.c b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/password_hash.c
index bdf1bcc27a..16fe6b8f4d 100644
--- a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/password_hash.c
+++ b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/password_hash.c
@@ -65,678 +65,10 @@
*
*/
-
-static int password_hash_handle(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request *req,
- const struct ldb_message *msg)
-{
- int ret, old_ret = -1;
- uint_t pwdProperties, pwdHistoryLength;
- uint_t userAccountControl;
- const char *dnsDomain, *realm;
- const char *sambaPassword = NULL;
- struct samr_Password *sambaLMPwdHistory, *sambaNTPwdHistory;
- struct samr_Password *lmPwdHash, *ntPwdHash;
- struct samr_Password *lmOldHash = NULL, *ntOldHash = NULL;
- struct samr_Password *new_sambaLMPwdHistory, *new_sambaNTPwdHistory;
- struct samr_Password local_lmNewHash, local_ntNewHash;
- int sambaLMPwdHistory_len, sambaNTPwdHistory_len;
- uint_t kvno;
- struct dom_sid *domain_sid;
- time_t now = time(NULL);
- NTTIME now_nt;
- int i;
- krb5_error_code krb5_ret;
-
- struct smb_krb5_context *smb_krb5_context;
-
- struct ldb_message_element *attribute;
- struct ldb_dn *dn = msg->dn;
- struct ldb_message *msg2;
-
- struct ldb_request *search_request = NULL;
- struct ldb_request *modify_request;
- struct ldb_request *modified_orig_request;
- struct ldb_result *res, *dom_res, *old_res;
-
- struct ldb_message_element *objectclasses;
- struct ldb_val computer_val;
- struct ldb_val person_val;
- BOOL is_computer;
-
- struct ldb_message *modify_msg;
-
- const char *domain_expression;
- const char *old_user_attrs[] = { "lmPwdHash", "ntPwdHash", NULL };
- const char *user_attrs[] = { "userAccountControl", "sambaLMPwdHistory",
- "sambaNTPwdHistory",
- "ntPwdHash",
- "objectSid", "msDS-KeyVersionNumber",
- "objectClass", "userPrincipalName",
- "samAccountName",
- NULL };
- const char * const domain_attrs[] = { "pwdProperties", "pwdHistoryLength",
- "dnsDomain", NULL };
-
- TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx;
-
- /* Do the original action */
-
- mem_ctx = talloc_new(module);
- if (!mem_ctx) {
- return LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR;
- }
-
- if (req->operation == LDB_REQ_MODIFY) {
- search_request = talloc(mem_ctx, struct ldb_request);
- if (!search_request) {
- talloc_free(mem_ctx);
- return LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR;
- }
-
- /* Look up the old ntPwdHash and lmPwdHash values, so
- * we can later place these into the password
- * history */
-
- search_request->operation = LDB_REQ_SEARCH;
- search_request->op.search.base = dn;
- search_request->op.search.scope = LDB_SCOPE_BASE;
- search_request->op.search.tree = ldb_parse_tree(module->ldb, NULL);
- search_request->op.search.attrs = old_user_attrs;
- search_request->controls = NULL;
-
- old_ret = ldb_next_request(module, search_request);
- }
-
- /* we can't change things untill we copy it */
- msg2 = ldb_msg_copy_shallow(mem_ctx, msg);
-
- /* look again, this time at the copied attribute */
- if (!msg2 || (attribute = ldb_msg_find_element(msg2, "sambaPassword")) == NULL ) {
- talloc_free(mem_ctx);
- /* Gah? where did it go? Oh well... */
- return LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR;
- }
-
- /* Wipe out the sambaPassword attribute set, we will handle it in
- * the second modify. We might not want it written to disk */
-
- if (req->operation == LDB_REQ_ADD) {
- if (attribute->num_values > 1) {
- ldb_set_errstring(module->ldb,
- talloc_asprintf(mem_ctx, "sambaPassword_handle: "
- "attempted set of multiple sambaPassword attributes on %s rejected",
- ldb_dn_linearize(mem_ctx, dn)));
- talloc_free(mem_ctx);
- return LDB_ERR_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATION;
- }
-
- if (attribute->num_values == 1) {
- sambaPassword = (const char *)attribute->values[0].data;
- ldb_msg_remove_attr(msg2, "sambaPassword");
- }
- } else if (((attribute->flags & LDB_FLAG_MOD_MASK) == LDB_FLAG_MOD_ADD)
- || ((attribute->flags & LDB_FLAG_MOD_MASK) == LDB_FLAG_MOD_REPLACE)) {
- if (attribute->num_values > 1) {
- ldb_set_errstring(module->ldb,
- talloc_asprintf(mem_ctx, "sambaPassword_handle: "
- "attempted set of multiple sambaPassword attributes on %s rejected",
- ldb_dn_linearize(mem_ctx, dn)));
- talloc_free(mem_ctx);
- return LDB_ERR_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATION;
- }
-
- if (attribute->num_values == 1) {
- sambaPassword = (const char *)attribute->values[0].data;
- ldb_msg_remove_attr(msg2, "sambaPassword");
- }
- }
-
- modified_orig_request = talloc(mem_ctx, struct ldb_request);
- if (!modified_orig_request) {
- talloc_free(mem_ctx);
- return LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR;
- }
-
- *modified_orig_request = *req;
- switch (modified_orig_request->operation) {
- case LDB_REQ_ADD:
- modified_orig_request->op.add.message = msg2;
- break;
- case LDB_REQ_MODIFY:
- modified_orig_request->op.mod.message = msg2;
- break;
- default:
- return LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR;
- }
-
- /* Send the (modified) request of the original caller down to the database */
- ret = ldb_next_request(module, modified_orig_request);
- if (ret) {
- talloc_free(mem_ctx);
- return ret;
- }
-
- /* While we do the search first (for the old password hashes),
- * we don't want to override any error that the modify may
- * have returned. Now check the error */
- if (req->operation == LDB_REQ_MODIFY) {
- if (old_ret) {
- talloc_free(mem_ctx);
- return old_ret;
- }
-
- /* Find out the old passwords details of the user */
- old_res = search_request->op.search.res;
- talloc_steal(mem_ctx, old_res);
- talloc_free(search_request);
-
- if (old_res->count != 1) {
- ldb_set_errstring(module->ldb,
- talloc_asprintf(mem_ctx, "password_hash_handle: "
- "(pre) search for %s found %d != 1 objects, for entry we just modified",
- ldb_dn_linearize(mem_ctx, dn),
- old_res->count));
- /* What happend? The above add/modify worked... */
- talloc_free(mem_ctx);
- return LDB_ERR_NO_SUCH_OBJECT;
- }
-
- lmOldHash = samdb_result_hash(mem_ctx, old_res->msgs[0], "lmPwdHash");
- ntOldHash = samdb_result_hash(mem_ctx, old_res->msgs[0], "ntPwdHash");
- }
-
- /* Start finding out details we need for the second modify.
- * We do this after the first add/modify because other modules
- * will have filled in the templates, and we may have had
- * things like the username (affecting the salt) changed along
- * with the password. */
-
- /* Now find out what is on the entry after the above add/modify */
- search_request = talloc(mem_ctx, struct ldb_request);
- if (!search_request) {
- talloc_free(mem_ctx);
- return LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR;
- }
-
- search_request->operation = LDB_REQ_SEARCH;
- search_request->op.search.base = dn;
- search_request->op.search.scope = LDB_SCOPE_BASE;
- search_request->op.search.tree = ldb_parse_tree(module->ldb, NULL);
- search_request->op.search.attrs = user_attrs;
- search_request->controls = NULL;
-
- ret = ldb_next_request(module, search_request);
- if (ret) {
- talloc_free(mem_ctx);
- return ret;
- }
-
- /* Find out the full details of the user */
- res = search_request->op.search.res;
- talloc_steal(mem_ctx, res);
- talloc_free(search_request);
-
- if (res->count != 1) {
- ldb_set_errstring(module->ldb,
- talloc_asprintf(mem_ctx, "password_hash_handle: "
- "search for %s found %d != 1 objects, for entry we just added/modified",
- ldb_dn_linearize(mem_ctx, dn),
- res->count));
- /* What happend? The above add/modify worked... */
- talloc_free(mem_ctx);
- return LDB_ERR_NO_SUCH_OBJECT;
- }
-
- userAccountControl = samdb_result_uint(res->msgs[0], "userAccountControl", 0);
- sambaLMPwdHistory_len = samdb_result_hashes(mem_ctx, res->msgs[0],
- "sambaLMPwdHistory", &sambaLMPwdHistory);
- sambaNTPwdHistory_len = samdb_result_hashes(mem_ctx, res->msgs[0],
- "sambaNTPwdHistory", &sambaNTPwdHistory);
- ntPwdHash = samdb_result_hash(mem_ctx, res->msgs[0], "ntPwdHash");
- kvno = samdb_result_uint(res->msgs[0], "msDS-KeyVersionNumber", 0);
-
- domain_sid = samdb_result_sid_prefix(mem_ctx, res->msgs[0], "objectSid");
-
-
- objectclasses = ldb_msg_find_element(res->msgs[0], "objectClass");
- person_val = data_blob_string_const("person");
-
- if (!objectclasses || !ldb_msg_find_val(objectclasses, &person_val)) {
- /* Not a 'person', so the rest of this doesn't make
- * sense. How we got a sambaPassword this far I don't
- * know... */
- ldb_set_errstring(module->ldb,
- talloc_asprintf(mem_ctx, "password_hash_handle: "
- "attempted set of sambaPassword on non-'person' object %s rejected",
- ldb_dn_linearize(mem_ctx, dn)));
- talloc_free(mem_ctx);
- return LDB_ERR_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATION;
- }
-
- computer_val = data_blob_string_const("computer");
-
- if (ldb_msg_find_val(objectclasses, &computer_val)) {
- is_computer = True;
- } else {
- is_computer = False;
- }
-
- domain_expression = talloc_asprintf(mem_ctx, "(&(objectSid=%s)(objectClass=domain))",
- ldap_encode_ndr_dom_sid(mem_ctx, domain_sid));
-
- /* Find the user's domain, then find out the domain password
- * properties */
- ret = ldb_search(module->ldb, NULL, LDB_SCOPE_SUBTREE, domain_expression,
- domain_attrs, &dom_res);
- if (ret) {
- talloc_free(mem_ctx);
- return ret;
- }
-
- if (dom_res->count != 1) {
- /* What happend? The user we are modifying must be odd... */
- ldb_set_errstring(module->ldb,
- talloc_asprintf(mem_ctx, "password_hash_handle: "
- "search for domain %s found %d != 1 objects",
- dom_sid_string(mem_ctx, domain_sid),
- dom_res->count));
- talloc_free(mem_ctx);
- return LDB_ERR_NO_SUCH_OBJECT;
- }
-
- pwdProperties = samdb_result_uint(dom_res->msgs[0], "pwdProperties", 0);
- pwdHistoryLength = samdb_result_uint(dom_res->msgs[0], "pwdHistoryLength", 0);
- dnsDomain = ldb_msg_find_string(dom_res->msgs[0], "dnsDomain", NULL);
- realm = strupper_talloc(mem_ctx, dnsDomain);
-
- /* Some operations below require kerberos contexts */
- if (smb_krb5_init_context(mem_ctx, &smb_krb5_context) != 0) {
- talloc_free(mem_ctx);
- return LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR;
- }
-
- /* Prepare the modifications to set all the hash/key types */
- modify_msg = ldb_msg_new(req);
- modify_msg->dn = talloc_reference(modify_msg, dn);
-
-#define CHECK_RET(x) \
- do { \
- int check_ret = x; \
- if (check_ret != LDB_SUCCESS) { \
- talloc_free(mem_ctx); \
- return check_ret; \
- } \
- } while(0)
-
- /* Setup krb5Key (we want to either delete an existing value,
- * or replace with a new one). Both the unicode and NT hash
- * only branches append keys to this multivalued entry. */
- CHECK_RET(ldb_msg_add_empty(modify_msg, "krb5Key", LDB_FLAG_MOD_REPLACE));
-
- /* Yay, we can compute new password hashes from the unicode
- * password */
- if (sambaPassword) {
- Principal *salt_principal;
- const char *user_principal_name = ldb_msg_find_string(res->msgs[0], "userPrincipalName", NULL);
-
- Key *keys;
- size_t num_keys;
-
- /* compute the new nt and lm hashes */
- if (E_deshash(sambaPassword, local_lmNewHash.hash)) {
- lmPwdHash = &local_lmNewHash;
- } else {
- lmPwdHash = NULL;
- }
- E_md4hash(sambaPassword, local_ntNewHash.hash);
- ntPwdHash = &local_ntNewHash;
- CHECK_RET(ldb_msg_add_empty(modify_msg, "ntPwdHash",
- LDB_FLAG_MOD_REPLACE));
- CHECK_RET(samdb_msg_add_hash(module->ldb, req,
- modify_msg, "ntPwdHash",
- ntPwdHash));
- CHECK_RET(ldb_msg_add_empty(modify_msg, "lmPwdHash",
- LDB_FLAG_MOD_REPLACE));
- if (lmPwdHash) {
- CHECK_RET(samdb_msg_add_hash(module->ldb, req,
- modify_msg, "lmPwdHash",
- lmPwdHash));
- }
-
- /* Many, many thanks to lukeh@padl.com for this
- * algorithm, described in his Nov 10 2004 mail to
- * samba-technical@samba.org */
-
- if (is_computer) {
- /* Determine a salting principal */
- char *samAccountName = talloc_strdup(mem_ctx, ldb_msg_find_string(res->msgs[0], "samAccountName", NULL));
- char *saltbody;
- if (!samAccountName) {
- ldb_set_errstring(module->ldb,
- talloc_asprintf(mem_ctx, "password_hash_handle: "
- "generation of new kerberos keys failed: %s is a computer without a samAccountName",
- ldb_dn_linearize(mem_ctx, dn)));
- talloc_free(mem_ctx);
- return LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR;
- }
- if (samAccountName[strlen(samAccountName)-1] == '$') {
- samAccountName[strlen(samAccountName)-1] = '\0';
- }
- saltbody = talloc_asprintf(mem_ctx, "%s.%s", samAccountName, dnsDomain);
-
- krb5_ret = krb5_make_principal(smb_krb5_context->krb5_context, &salt_principal, realm, "host", saltbody, NULL);
- } else if (user_principal_name) {
- char *p;
- user_principal_name = talloc_strdup(mem_ctx, user_principal_name);
- if (!user_principal_name) {
- talloc_free(mem_ctx);
- return LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR;
- } else {
- p = strchr(user_principal_name, '@');
- if (p) {
- p[0] = '\0';
- }
- krb5_ret = krb5_make_principal(smb_krb5_context->krb5_context, &salt_principal, realm, user_principal_name, NULL);
- }
- } else {
- const char *samAccountName = ldb_msg_find_string(res->msgs[0], "samAccountName", NULL);
- if (!samAccountName) {
- ldb_set_errstring(module->ldb,
- talloc_asprintf(mem_ctx, "password_hash_handle: "
- "generation of new kerberos keys failed: %s has no samAccountName",
- ldb_dn_linearize(mem_ctx, dn)));
- talloc_free(mem_ctx);
- return LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR;
- }
- krb5_ret = krb5_make_principal(smb_krb5_context->krb5_context, &salt_principal, realm, samAccountName, NULL);
- }
-
-
- if (krb5_ret) {
- ldb_set_errstring(module->ldb,
- talloc_asprintf(mem_ctx, "password_hash_handle: "
- "generation of a saltking principal failed: %s",
- smb_get_krb5_error_message(smb_krb5_context->krb5_context,
- krb5_ret, mem_ctx)));
- talloc_free(mem_ctx);
- return LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR;
- }
-
- /* TODO: We may wish to control the encryption types chosen in future */
- krb5_ret = hdb_generate_key_set_password(smb_krb5_context->krb5_context,
- salt_principal, sambaPassword, &keys, &num_keys);
- krb5_free_principal(smb_krb5_context->krb5_context, salt_principal);
-
- if (krb5_ret) {
- ldb_set_errstring(module->ldb,
- talloc_asprintf(mem_ctx, "password_hash_handle: "
- "generation of new kerberos keys failed: %s",
- smb_get_krb5_error_message(smb_krb5_context->krb5_context,
- krb5_ret, mem_ctx)));
- talloc_free(mem_ctx);
- return LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR;
- }
-
- /* Walking all the key types generated, transform each
- * key into an ASN.1 blob
- */
- for (i=0; i < num_keys; i++) {
- unsigned char *buf;
- size_t buf_size;
- size_t len;
- struct ldb_val val;
-
- if (keys[i].key.keytype == ETYPE_ARCFOUR_HMAC_MD5) {
- /* We might end up doing this below:
- * This ensures we get the unicode
- * conversion right. This should also
- * be fixed in the Heimdal libs */
- continue;
- }
- ASN1_MALLOC_ENCODE(Key, buf, buf_size, &keys[i], &len, krb5_ret);
- if (krb5_ret) {
- return LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR;
- }
-
- val.data = talloc_memdup(req, buf, len);
- val.length = len;
- free(buf);
- if (!val.data || krb5_ret) {
- hdb_free_keys (smb_krb5_context->krb5_context, num_keys, keys);
- talloc_free(mem_ctx);
- return LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR;
- }
- ret = ldb_msg_add_value(modify_msg, "krb5Key", &val);
- if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) {
- hdb_free_keys (smb_krb5_context->krb5_context, num_keys, keys);
- talloc_free(mem_ctx);
- return ret;
- }
- }
-
- hdb_free_keys (smb_krb5_context->krb5_context, num_keys, keys);
- }
-
- /* Possibly kill off the cleartext or store it */
- CHECK_RET(ldb_msg_add_empty(modify_msg, "sambaPassword", LDB_FLAG_MOD_REPLACE));
-
- if (sambaPassword && (pwdProperties & DOMAIN_PASSWORD_STORE_CLEARTEXT) &&
- (userAccountControl & UF_ENCRYPTED_TEXT_PASSWORD_ALLOWED)) {
- CHECK_RET(ldb_msg_add_string(modify_msg, "sambaPassword", sambaPassword));
- }
-
- /* Even if we didn't get a sambaPassword, we can still setup
- * krb5Key from the NT hash.
- *
- * This is an append, so it works with the 'continue' in the
- * unicode loop above, to use Samba's NT hash function, which
- * is more correct than Heimdal's
- */
- if (ntPwdHash) {
- unsigned char *buf;
- size_t buf_size;
- size_t len;
- struct ldb_val val;
- Key key;
-
- key.mkvno = 0;
- key.salt = NULL; /* No salt for this enc type */
-
- krb5_ret = krb5_keyblock_init(smb_krb5_context->krb5_context,
- ETYPE_ARCFOUR_HMAC_MD5,
- ntPwdHash->hash, sizeof(ntPwdHash->hash),
- &key.key);
- if (krb5_ret) {
- return LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR;
- }
- ASN1_MALLOC_ENCODE(Key, buf, buf_size, &key, &len, krb5_ret);
- if (krb5_ret) {
- return LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR;
- }
- krb5_free_keyblock_contents(smb_krb5_context->krb5_context,
- &key.key);
-
- val.data = talloc_memdup(req, buf, len);
- val.length = len;
- free(buf);
- if (!val.data || ret) {
- return LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR;
- }
- CHECK_RET(ldb_msg_add_value(modify_msg, "krb5Key", &val));
- }
-
- /* If the original caller did anything with pwdLastSet then skip this. It could be an incoming samsync */
- attribute = ldb_msg_find_element(msg, "pwdLastSet");
- if (attribute == NULL) {
- /* Update the password last set time */
- unix_to_nt_time(&now_nt, now);
- CHECK_RET(ldb_msg_add_empty(modify_msg, "pwdLastSet", LDB_FLAG_MOD_REPLACE));
- CHECK_RET(samdb_msg_add_uint64(module->ldb, mem_ctx, modify_msg, "pwdLastSet", now_nt));
- }
-
- /* If the original caller did anything with "msDS-KeyVersionNumber" then skip this. It could be an incoming samsync */
- attribute = ldb_msg_find_element(msg, "msDS-KeyVersionNumber");
- if (attribute == NULL) {
- if (kvno == 0) {
- CHECK_RET(ldb_msg_add_empty(modify_msg, "msDS-KeyVersionNumber",
- LDB_FLAG_MOD_REPLACE));
- CHECK_RET(samdb_msg_add_uint(module->ldb, mem_ctx, modify_msg, "msDS-KeyVersionNumber", kvno + 1));
- } else {
- /* While we should be in a transaction, go one extra
- * step in the dance for an 'atomic' increment. This
- * may be of value against remote LDAP servers. (Note
- * however that Mulitmaster replication stil offers no
- * such guarantee) */
-
- struct ldb_val old_kvno, new_kvno;
- old_kvno.data = (uint8_t *)talloc_asprintf(mem_ctx, "%u", kvno);
- if (!old_kvno.data) {
- return -1;
- }
- old_kvno.length = strlen((char *)old_kvno.data);
-
- new_kvno.data = (uint8_t *)talloc_asprintf(mem_ctx, "%u", kvno + 1);
- if (!new_kvno.data) {
- return -1;
- }
- new_kvno.length = strlen((char *)new_kvno.data);
-
- CHECK_RET(ldb_msg_add_empty(modify_msg, "msDS-KeyVersionNumber",
- LDB_FLAG_MOD_DELETE));
- CHECK_RET(ldb_msg_add_empty(modify_msg, "msDS-KeyVersionNumber",
- LDB_FLAG_MOD_ADD));
- modify_msg->elements[modify_msg->num_elements - 2].num_values = 1;
- modify_msg->elements[modify_msg->num_elements - 2].values = &old_kvno;
- modify_msg->elements[modify_msg->num_elements - 1].num_values = 1;
- modify_msg->elements[modify_msg->num_elements - 1].values = &new_kvno;
- }
- }
-
- CHECK_RET(ldb_msg_add_empty(modify_msg, "sambaLMPwdHistory",
- LDB_FLAG_MOD_REPLACE));
- CHECK_RET(ldb_msg_add_empty(modify_msg, "sambaNTPwdHistory",
- LDB_FLAG_MOD_REPLACE));
-
- /* If we have something to put into the history, or an old
- * history element to expire, update the history */
- if (pwdHistoryLength > 0 &&
- ((sambaNTPwdHistory_len > 0) || (sambaLMPwdHistory_len > 0)
- || lmOldHash || ntOldHash)) {
- /* store the password history */
- new_sambaLMPwdHistory = talloc_array(mem_ctx, struct samr_Password,
- pwdHistoryLength);
- if (!new_sambaLMPwdHistory) {
- return LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR;
- }
- new_sambaNTPwdHistory = talloc_array(mem_ctx, struct samr_Password,
- pwdHistoryLength);
- if (!new_sambaNTPwdHistory) {
- return LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR;
- }
- for (i=0;i<MIN(pwdHistoryLength-1, sambaLMPwdHistory_len);i++) {
- new_sambaLMPwdHistory[i+1] = sambaLMPwdHistory[i];
- }
- for (i=0;i<MIN(pwdHistoryLength-1, sambaNTPwdHistory_len);i++) {
- new_sambaNTPwdHistory[i+1] = sambaNTPwdHistory[i];
- }
-
- /* Don't store 'long' passwords in the LM history,
- but make sure to 'expire' one password off the other end */
- if (lmOldHash) {
- new_sambaLMPwdHistory[0] = *lmOldHash;
- } else {
- ZERO_STRUCT(new_sambaLMPwdHistory[0]);
- }
- sambaLMPwdHistory_len = MIN(sambaLMPwdHistory_len + 1, pwdHistoryLength);
-
- /* Likewise, we might not have an old NT password (lm
- * only password change function on previous change) */
- if (ntOldHash) {
- new_sambaNTPwdHistory[0] = *ntOldHash;
- } else {
- ZERO_STRUCT(new_sambaNTPwdHistory[0]);
- }
- sambaNTPwdHistory_len = MIN(sambaNTPwdHistory_len + 1, pwdHistoryLength);
-
- CHECK_RET(samdb_msg_add_hashes(mem_ctx, modify_msg,
- "sambaLMPwdHistory",
- new_sambaLMPwdHistory,
- sambaLMPwdHistory_len));
-
- CHECK_RET(samdb_msg_add_hashes(mem_ctx, modify_msg,
- "sambaNTPwdHistory",
- new_sambaNTPwdHistory,
- sambaNTPwdHistory_len));
- }
-
- /* Too much code above, we should check we got it close to reasonable */
- CHECK_RET(ldb_msg_sanity_check(modify_msg));
-
- modify_request = talloc(mem_ctx, struct ldb_request);
- if (!modify_request) {
- talloc_free(mem_ctx);
- return LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR;
- }
-
- modify_request->operation = LDB_REQ_MODIFY;
- modify_request->op.mod.message = modify_msg;
- modify_request->controls = NULL;
-
- ret = ldb_next_request(module, modify_request);
-
- talloc_free(mem_ctx);
- return ret;
-}
-
-/* add_record: do things with the sambaPassword attribute */
-static int password_hash_add(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request *req)
-{
- const struct ldb_message *msg = req->op.add.message;
-
- ldb_debug(module->ldb, LDB_DEBUG_TRACE, "password_hash_add_record\n");
-
- if (ldb_dn_is_special(msg->dn)) { /* do not manipulate our control entries */
- return ldb_next_request(module, req);
- }
-
- /* If no part of this touches the sambaPassword, then we don't
- * need to make any changes. For password changes/set there should
- * be a 'delete' or a 'modify' on this attribute. */
- if (ldb_msg_find_element(msg, "sambaPassword") == NULL ) {
- return ldb_next_request(module, req);
- }
-
- return password_hash_handle(module, req, msg);
-}
-
-/* modify_record: do things with the sambaPassword attribute */
-static int password_hash_modify(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request *req)
-{
- const struct ldb_message *msg = req->op.mod.message;
-
- ldb_debug(module->ldb, LDB_DEBUG_TRACE, "password_hash_modify_record\n");
-
- if (ldb_dn_is_special(msg->dn)) { /* do not manipulate our control entries */
- return ldb_next_request(module, req);
- }
-
- /* If no part of this touches the sambaPassword, then we don't
- * need to make any changes. For password changes/set there should
- * be a 'delete' or a 'modify' on this attribute. */
- if (ldb_msg_find_element(msg, "sambaPassword") == NULL ) {
- return ldb_next_request(module, req);
- }
-
- return password_hash_handle(module, req, msg);
-}
-
-enum ph_type {PH_ADD, PH_MOD};
-enum ph_step {PH_ADD_SEARCH_DOM, PH_ADD_DO_ADD, PH_MOD_DO_REQ, PH_MOD_SEARCH_SELF, PH_MOD_SEARCH_DOM, PH_MOD_DO_MOD};
-
struct ph_async_context {
- enum ph_type type;
- enum ph_step step;
+ enum ph_type {PH_ADD, PH_MOD} type;
+ enum ph_step {PH_ADD_SEARCH_DOM, PH_ADD_DO_ADD, PH_MOD_DO_REQ, PH_MOD_SEARCH_SELF, PH_MOD_SEARCH_DOM, PH_MOD_DO_MOD} step;
struct ldb_module *module;
struct ldb_request *orig_req;
@@ -1212,7 +544,7 @@ static struct domain_data *get_domain_data(struct ldb_module *module, void *mem_
return data;
}
-static int password_hash_add_async(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request *req)
+static int password_hash_add(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request *req)
{
struct ldb_async_handle *h;
struct ph_async_context *ac;
@@ -1220,7 +552,7 @@ static int password_hash_add_async(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request
struct dom_sid *domain_sid;
int ret;
- ldb_debug(module->ldb, LDB_DEBUG_TRACE, "password_hash_add_async\n");
+ ldb_debug(module->ldb, LDB_DEBUG_TRACE, "password_hash_add\n");
if (ldb_dn_is_special(req->op.add.message->dn)) { /* do not manipulate our control entries */
return ldb_next_request(module, req);
@@ -1278,7 +610,7 @@ static int password_hash_add_async(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request
return ldb_next_request(module, ac->dom_req);
}
-static int password_hash_add_async_do_add(struct ldb_async_handle *h) {
+static int password_hash_add_do_add(struct ldb_async_handle *h) {
struct ph_async_context *ac;
struct domain_data *domain;
@@ -1357,9 +689,9 @@ static int password_hash_add_async_do_add(struct ldb_async_handle *h) {
return ldb_next_request(ac->module, ac->down_req);
}
-static int password_hash_mod_async_search_self(struct ldb_async_handle *h);
+static int password_hash_mod_search_self(struct ldb_async_handle *h);
-static int password_hash_modify_async(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request *req)
+static int password_hash_modify(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request *req)
{
struct ldb_async_handle *h;
struct ph_async_context *ac;
@@ -1367,7 +699,7 @@ static int password_hash_modify_async(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_requ
struct ldb_message_element *ntAttr;
struct ldb_message_element *lmAttr;
- ldb_debug(module->ldb, LDB_DEBUG_TRACE, "password_hash_add_async\n");
+ ldb_debug(module->ldb, LDB_DEBUG_TRACE, "password_hash_modify\n");
if (ldb_dn_is_special(req->op.mod.message->dn)) { /* do not manipulate our control entries */
return ldb_next_request(module, req);
@@ -1437,7 +769,7 @@ static int password_hash_modify_async(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_requ
if (ac->down_req->op.mod.message->num_elements == 0) {
talloc_free(ac->down_req);
ac->down_req = NULL;
- return password_hash_mod_async_search_self(h);
+ return password_hash_mod_search_self(h);
}
ac->down_req->async.context = NULL;
@@ -1483,7 +815,7 @@ static int get_self_callback(struct ldb_context *ldb, void *context, struct ldb_
return LDB_SUCCESS;
}
-static int password_hash_mod_async_search_self(struct ldb_async_handle *h) {
+static int password_hash_mod_search_self(struct ldb_async_handle *h) {
struct ph_async_context *ac;
@@ -1515,7 +847,7 @@ static int password_hash_mod_async_search_self(struct ldb_async_handle *h) {
return ldb_next_request(ac->module, ac->search_req);
}
-static int password_hash_mod_async_search_dom(struct ldb_async_handle *h) {
+static int password_hash_mod_search_dom(struct ldb_async_handle *h) {
struct ph_async_context *ac;
struct dom_sid *domain_sid;
@@ -1541,7 +873,7 @@ static int password_hash_mod_async_search_dom(struct ldb_async_handle *h) {
return ldb_next_request(ac->module, ac->dom_req);
}
-static int password_hash_mod_async_do_mod(struct ldb_async_handle *h) {
+static int password_hash_mod_do_mod(struct ldb_async_handle *h) {
struct ph_async_context *ac;
struct domain_data *domain;
@@ -1700,7 +1032,7 @@ static int ph_async_wait(struct ldb_async_handle *handle) {
}
/* domain search done, go on */
- return password_hash_add_async_do_add(handle);
+ return password_hash_add_do_add(handle);
case PH_ADD_DO_ADD:
ret = ldb_async_wait(ac->down_req->async.handle, LDB_WAIT_NONE);
@@ -1737,7 +1069,7 @@ static int ph_async_wait(struct ldb_async_handle *handle) {
}
/* non-password mods done, go on */
- return password_hash_mod_async_search_self(handle);
+ return password_hash_mod_search_self(handle);
case PH_MOD_SEARCH_SELF:
ret = ldb_async_wait(ac->search_req->async.handle, LDB_WAIT_NONE);
@@ -1756,7 +1088,7 @@ static int ph_async_wait(struct ldb_async_handle *handle) {
}
/* self search done, go on */
- return password_hash_mod_async_search_dom(handle);
+ return password_hash_mod_search_dom(handle);
case PH_MOD_SEARCH_DOM:
ret = ldb_async_wait(ac->dom_req->async.handle, LDB_WAIT_NONE);
@@ -1775,7 +1107,7 @@ static int ph_async_wait(struct ldb_async_handle *handle) {
}
/* domain search done, go on */
- return password_hash_mod_async_do_mod(handle);
+ return password_hash_mod_do_mod(handle);
case PH_MOD_DO_MOD:
ret = ldb_async_wait(ac->mod_req->async.handle, LDB_WAIT_NONE);
@@ -1830,27 +1162,10 @@ static int password_hash_async_wait(struct ldb_async_handle *handle, enum ldb_as
}
}
-static int password_hash_request(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request *req)
-{
- switch (req->operation) {
-
- case LDB_REQ_ADD:
- return password_hash_add(module, req);
-
- case LDB_REQ_MODIFY:
- return password_hash_modify(module, req);
-
- default:
- return ldb_next_request(module, req);
-
- }
-}
-
static const struct ldb_module_ops password_hash_ops = {
.name = "password_hash",
- .add = password_hash_add_async,
- .modify = password_hash_modify_async,
- .request = password_hash_request,
+ .add = password_hash_add,
+ .modify = password_hash_modify,
.async_wait = password_hash_async_wait
};