summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/password_hash.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorSimo Sorce <idra@samba.org>2006-02-22 05:21:43 +0000
committerGerald (Jerry) Carter <jerry@samba.org>2007-10-10 13:51:59 -0500
commitd590dea10b3abf93fcc8138189291e8b66bae7d7 (patch)
treed859a38ca49d480c36e3a8a3ef2ac28e2b964066 /source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/password_hash.c
parent00fe70e5b917769418f68eaa255d3a06a9a08ce7 (diff)
downloadsamba-d590dea10b3abf93fcc8138189291e8b66bae7d7.tar.gz
samba-d590dea10b3abf93fcc8138189291e8b66bae7d7.tar.bz2
samba-d590dea10b3abf93fcc8138189291e8b66bae7d7.zip
r13615: Make ldb_set_errstring get ldb instead of module as parameter.
The module was just used to get to the ldb so it was meningless. Also add LDB_WAIT_ONCE e relative code in ldb_ildap.c (This used to be commit d5b467b7c132b0bd4d23918ba7bf3370b1afcce8)
Diffstat (limited to 'source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/password_hash.c')
-rw-r--r--source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/password_hash.c20
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/password_hash.c b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/password_hash.c
index 630edf1c7a..e28c85ae37 100644
--- a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/password_hash.c
+++ b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/password_hash.c
@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ static int password_hash_handle(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request *r
if (req->operation == LDB_REQ_ADD) {
if (attribute->num_values > 1) {
- ldb_set_errstring(module,
+ ldb_set_errstring(module->ldb,
talloc_asprintf(mem_ctx, "sambaPassword_handle: "
"attempted set of multiple sambaPassword attributes on %s rejected",
ldb_dn_linearize(mem_ctx, dn)));
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ static int password_hash_handle(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request *r
} else if (((attribute->flags & LDB_FLAG_MOD_MASK) == LDB_FLAG_MOD_ADD)
|| ((attribute->flags & LDB_FLAG_MOD_MASK) == LDB_FLAG_MOD_REPLACE)) {
if (attribute->num_values > 1) {
- ldb_set_errstring(module,
+ ldb_set_errstring(module->ldb,
talloc_asprintf(mem_ctx, "sambaPassword_handle: "
"attempted set of multiple sambaPassword attributes on %s rejected",
ldb_dn_linearize(mem_ctx, dn)));
@@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ static int password_hash_handle(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request *r
talloc_free(search_request);
if (old_res->count != 1) {
- ldb_set_errstring(module,
+ ldb_set_errstring(module->ldb,
talloc_asprintf(mem_ctx, "password_hash_handle: "
"(pre) search for %s found %d != 1 objects, for entry we just modified",
ldb_dn_linearize(mem_ctx, dn),
@@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ static int password_hash_handle(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request *r
talloc_free(search_request);
if (res->count != 1) {
- ldb_set_errstring(module,
+ ldb_set_errstring(module->ldb,
talloc_asprintf(mem_ctx, "password_hash_handle: "
"search for %s found %d != 1 objects, for entry we just added/modified",
ldb_dn_linearize(mem_ctx, dn),
@@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ static int password_hash_handle(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request *r
/* Not a 'person', so the rest of this doesn't make
* sense. How we got a sambaPassword this far I don't
* know... */
- ldb_set_errstring(module,
+ ldb_set_errstring(module->ldb,
talloc_asprintf(mem_ctx, "password_hash_handle: "
"attempted set of sambaPassword on non-'person' object %s rejected",
ldb_dn_linearize(mem_ctx, dn)));
@@ -338,7 +338,7 @@ static int password_hash_handle(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request *r
if (dom_res->count != 1) {
/* What happend? The user we are modifying must be odd... */
- ldb_set_errstring(module,
+ ldb_set_errstring(module->ldb,
talloc_asprintf(mem_ctx, "password_hash_handle: "
"search for domain %s found %d != 1 objects",
dom_sid_string(mem_ctx, domain_sid),
@@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ static int password_hash_handle(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request *r
char *samAccountName = talloc_strdup(mem_ctx, ldb_msg_find_string(res->msgs[0], "samAccountName", NULL));
char *saltbody;
if (!samAccountName) {
- ldb_set_errstring(module,
+ ldb_set_errstring(module->ldb,
talloc_asprintf(mem_ctx, "password_hash_handle: "
"generation of new kerberos keys failed: %s is a computer without a samAccountName",
ldb_dn_linearize(mem_ctx, dn)));
@@ -443,7 +443,7 @@ static int password_hash_handle(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request *r
} else {
const char *samAccountName = ldb_msg_find_string(res->msgs[0], "samAccountName", NULL);
if (!samAccountName) {
- ldb_set_errstring(module,
+ ldb_set_errstring(module->ldb,
talloc_asprintf(mem_ctx, "password_hash_handle: "
"generation of new kerberos keys failed: %s has no samAccountName",
ldb_dn_linearize(mem_ctx, dn)));
@@ -455,7 +455,7 @@ static int password_hash_handle(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request *r
if (krb5_ret) {
- ldb_set_errstring(module,
+ ldb_set_errstring(module->ldb,
talloc_asprintf(mem_ctx, "password_hash_handle: "
"generation of a saltking principal failed: %s",
smb_get_krb5_error_message(smb_krb5_context->krb5_context,
@@ -470,7 +470,7 @@ static int password_hash_handle(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request *r
krb5_free_principal(smb_krb5_context->krb5_context, salt_principal);
if (krb5_ret) {
- ldb_set_errstring(module,
+ ldb_set_errstring(module->ldb,
talloc_asprintf(mem_ctx, "password_hash_handle: "
"generation of new kerberos keys failed: %s",
smb_get_krb5_error_message(smb_krb5_context->krb5_context,