s4-samdb: internal s4 ldb modules should be GPL not LGPL

I think these modules ended up LGPL because someone based the module
on an existing LGPL module in the core ldb, and it spread from
there. Certainly there is no reason for the ldb modules that are not
distributed as part of ldb to be LGPL.

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 6 deletions

diff --git a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/samldb.c b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/samldb.c
index 886b0aceda..8f51dc7699 100644
--- a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/samldb.c
+++ b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/samldb.c
@@ -5,20 +5,16 @@
    Copyright (C) Simo Sorce  2004-2008
    Copyright (C) Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer 2009
 
-   * NOTICE: this module is NOT released under the GNU LGPL license as
-   * other ldb code. This module is release under the GNU GPL v3 or
-   * later license.
-
    This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
    it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
    the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
    (at your option) any later version.
-
+   
    This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
    but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
    MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
    GNU General Public License for more details.
-
+   
    You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
    along with this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
 */