summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAndrew Tridgell <tridge@samba.org>2009-03-26 22:10:02 +1100
committerAndrew Tridgell <tridge@samba.org>2009-03-26 22:10:02 +1100
commit3f37342bc0e7c26b6a61490706fe8cec3e6d491e (patch)
tree6f0f966e4a38be64b59938e294aa4652d8b025cf /source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules
parentb574a09cf54b4ea5a7e0575848725bd6452d2b4d (diff)
downloadsamba-3f37342bc0e7c26b6a61490706fe8cec3e6d491e.tar.gz
samba-3f37342bc0e7c26b6a61490706fe8cec3e6d491e.tar.bz2
samba-3f37342bc0e7c26b6a61490706fe8cec3e6d491e.zip
fixed possibleinferiors.py so it matches windows behaviour
This test code builds the possibleInferiors for every class in the schema on a target machine, and compares it to the servers possibleInferiors attribute. The MS-ADTS spec describes how to calculate possibleInferiors for a object, but it seems to have some bugs. The spec says that we need to use AUXCLASSES, and it does not mention the use of the SUBCLASS tree. In trying to match windows behaviour, I found that I needed to ignore the AUXCLASSES and build a SUBCLASSES tree.
Diffstat (limited to 'source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules')
-rwxr-xr-xsource4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/tests/possibleinferiors.py166
1 files changed, 127 insertions, 39 deletions
diff --git a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/tests/possibleinferiors.py b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/tests/possibleinferiors.py
index 0e74456dac..ec426c099b 100755
--- a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/tests/possibleinferiors.py
+++ b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/tests/possibleinferiors.py
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ schema_base = rootDse["schemaNamingContext"][0]
def possible_inferiors_search(db, oc):
"""return the possible inferiors via a search for the possibleInferiors attribute"""
res = db.search(base=schema_base,
- expression=("ldapdisplayname=%s" % oc),
+ expression=("ldapDisplayName=%s" % oc),
attrs=["possibleInferiors"])
poss=[]
@@ -86,47 +86,137 @@ def possible_inferiors_search(db, oc):
# see [MS-ADTS] section 3.1.1.4.5.21
-# for this algorithm
+# and section 3.1.1.4.2 for this algorithm
# !systemOnly=TRUE
# !objectClassCategory=2
# !objectClassCategory=3
-def POSSINFERIORS(db, oc):
- """returns a list of possible inferiors to a class. Returned list has the ldapdisplayname, systemOnly and objectClassCategory for each element"""
- expanded = [oc]
- res = db.search(base=schema_base,
- expression=("subclassof=%s" % str(oc["ldapdisplayname"][0])),
- attrs=["ldapdisplayname", "systemOnly", "objectClassCategory"])
+def SUPCLASSES(classinfo, oc):
+ list = []
+ if oc == "top":
+ return list
+ if classinfo[oc].get("SUPCLASSES") is not None:
+ return classinfo[oc]["SUPCLASSES"]
+ res = classinfo[oc]["subClassOf"];
for r in res:
- expanded.extend(POSSINFERIORS(db,r))
- return expanded
+ list.append(r)
+ list.extend(SUPCLASSES(classinfo,r))
+ classinfo[oc]["SUPCLASSES"] = list
+ return list
-def possible_inferiors_constructed(db, oc):
- """return the possbible inferiors via a recursive search and match"""
- res = db.search(base=schema_base,
- expression=("(&(objectclass=classSchema)(|(posssuperiors=%s)(systemposssuperiors=%s)))" % (oc,oc)),
- attrs=["ldapdisplayname", "systemOnly", "objectClassCategory"])
+def AUXCLASSES(classinfo, oclist):
+ list = []
+ if oclist == []:
+ return list
+ for oc in oclist:
+ if classinfo[oc].get("AUXCLASSES") is not None:
+ list.extend(classinfo[oc]["AUXCLASSES"])
+ else:
+ list2 = []
+ list2.extend(classinfo[oc]["systemAuxiliaryClass"])
+ list2.extend(AUXCLASSES(classinfo, classinfo[oc]["systemAuxiliaryClass"]))
+ list2.extend(classinfo[oc]["auxiliaryClass"])
+ list2.extend(AUXCLASSES(classinfo, classinfo[oc]["auxiliaryClass"]))
+ list2.extend(AUXCLASSES(classinfo, SUPCLASSES(classinfo, oc)))
+ classinfo[oc]["AUXCLASSES"] = list2
+ list.extend(list2)
+ return list
- poss = []
+def SUBCLASSES(classinfo, oclist):
+ list = []
+ for oc in oclist:
+ list.extend(classinfo[oc]["SUBCLASSES"])
+ return list
+
+def POSSSUPERIORS(classinfo, oclist):
+ list = []
+ for oc in oclist:
+ if classinfo[oc].get("POSSSUPERIORS") is not None:
+ list.extend(classinfo[oc]["POSSSUPERIORS"])
+ else:
+ list2 = []
+ list2.extend(classinfo[oc]["systemPossSuperiors"])
+ list2.extend(classinfo[oc]["possSuperiors"])
+ list2.extend(POSSSUPERIORS(classinfo, SUPCLASSES(classinfo, oc)))
+ # the WSPP docs suggest we should do this:
+ # list2.extend(POSSSUPERIORS(classinfo, AUXCLASSES(classinfo, [oc])))
+ # but testing against w2k3 and w2k8 shows that we need to do this instead
+ list2.extend(SUBCLASSES(classinfo, list2))
+ classinfo[oc]["POSSSUPERIORS"] = list2
+ list.extend(list2)
+ return list
+
+def pull_classinfo(db):
+ """At startup we build a classinfo[] dictionary that holds all the information needed to construct the possible inferiors"""
+ classinfo = {}
+ res = db.search(base=schema_base,
+ expression="objectclass=classSchema",
+ attrs=["ldapDisplayName", "systemOnly", "objectClassCategory",
+ "possSuperiors", "systemPossSuperiors",
+ "auxiliaryClass", "systemAuxiliaryClass", "subClassOf"])
for r in res:
- poss.extend(POSSINFERIORS(db,r))
-
- poss2 = []
- for p in poss:
- if (not (p["systemOnly"][0] == "TRUE" or
- int(p["objectClassCategory"][0]) == 2 or
- int(p["objectClassCategory"][0]) == 3)):
- poss2.append(p["ldapdisplayname"][0])
-
- poss2 = uniq_list(poss2)
- poss2.sort()
- return poss2
-
-def test_class(db, oc):
+ name = str(r["ldapDisplayName"][0])
+ classinfo[name] = {}
+ if str(r["systemOnly"]) == "TRUE":
+ classinfo[name]["systemOnly"] = True
+ else:
+ classinfo[name]["systemOnly"] = False
+ if r.get("objectClassCategory"):
+ classinfo[name]["objectClassCategory"] = int(r["objectClassCategory"][0])
+ else:
+ classinfo[name]["objectClassCategory"] = 0
+ for a in [ "possSuperiors", "systemPossSuperiors",
+ "auxiliaryClass", "systemAuxiliaryClass",
+ "subClassOf" ]:
+ classinfo[name][a] = []
+ if r.get(a):
+ for i in r[a]:
+ classinfo[name][a].append(str(i))
+
+ # build a list of subclasses for each class
+ def subclasses_recurse(subclasses, oc):
+ list = subclasses[oc]
+ for c in list:
+ list.extend(subclasses_recurse(subclasses, c))
+ return list
+
+ subclasses = {}
+ for oc in classinfo:
+ subclasses[oc] = []
+ for oc in classinfo:
+ for c in classinfo[oc]["subClassOf"]:
+ if not c == oc:
+ subclasses[c].append(oc)
+ for oc in classinfo:
+ classinfo[oc]["SUBCLASSES"] = uniq_list(subclasses_recurse(subclasses, oc))
+
+ return classinfo
+
+def is_in_list(list, c):
+ for a in list:
+ if c == a:
+ return True
+ return False
+
+def possible_inferiors_constructed(db, classinfo, c):
+ list = []
+ for oc in classinfo:
+ superiors = POSSSUPERIORS(classinfo, [oc])
+ if (is_in_list(superiors, c) and
+ classinfo[oc]["systemOnly"] == False and
+ classinfo[oc]["objectClassCategory"] != 2 and
+ classinfo[oc]["objectClassCategory"] != 3):
+ list.append(oc)
+ list = uniq_list(list)
+ list.sort()
+ return list
+
+def test_class(db, classinfo, oc):
"""test to see if one objectclass returns the correct possibleInferiors"""
+ print "testing objectClass %s" % oc
poss1 = possible_inferiors_search(db, oc)
- poss2 = possible_inferiors_constructed(db, oc)
+ poss2 = possible_inferiors_constructed(db, classinfo, oc)
if poss1 != poss2:
print "Returned incorrect list for objectclass %s" % oc
print poss1
@@ -137,19 +227,17 @@ def test_class(db, oc):
def get_object_classes(db):
"""return a list of all object classes"""
- res = db.search(base=schema_base,
- expression="objectClass=classSchema",
- attrs=["ldapdisplayname"])
list=[]
- for item in res:
- list.append(item["ldapdisplayname"][0])
+ for item in classinfo:
+ list.append(item)
return list
+classinfo = pull_classinfo(db)
+
if objectclass is None:
for oc in get_object_classes(db):
- print "testing objectClass %s" % oc
- test_class(db,oc)
+ test_class(db,classinfo,oc)
else:
- test_class(db,objectclass)
+ test_class(db,classinfo,objectclass)
print "Lists match OK"