diff options
author | Andrew Tridgell <tridge@samba.org> | 2011-08-02 17:19:16 +1000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Andrew Tridgell <tridge@samba.org> | 2011-08-04 16:17:25 +1000 |
commit | 37799b0644af6d0135af52f07414efd52bbe697e (patch) | |
tree | 26012ae8169b012ecd00e7fe25e892ea0fb9ceb1 /source4/dsdb/samdb | |
parent | 23598d56ff7a0bf9cb55606da0ede234e12dbc57 (diff) | |
download | samba-37799b0644af6d0135af52f07414efd52bbe697e.tar.gz samba-37799b0644af6d0135af52f07414efd52bbe697e.tar.bz2 samba-37799b0644af6d0135af52f07414efd52bbe697e.zip |
s4-dsdb: extend the extended_dn_in module to handle DN links
this replaces DN components in incoming filter expressions with the
full extended DN of the target, which allows search expressions based
on <GUID=> and <SID=> DNs, as well as fixing the problem with one-way
links in search expressions
Pair-Programmed-With: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'source4/dsdb/samdb')
-rw-r--r-- | source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/extended_dn_in.c | 148 |
1 files changed, 104 insertions, 44 deletions
diff --git a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/extended_dn_in.c b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/extended_dn_in.c index 6d43fb558f..76a951866d 100644 --- a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/extended_dn_in.c +++ b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/extended_dn_in.c @@ -264,6 +264,40 @@ static int extended_base_callback(struct ldb_request *req, struct ldb_reply *are } +/* + windows ldap searchs don't allow a baseDN with more + than one extended component, or an extended + component and a string DN + + We only enforce this over ldap, not for internal + use, as there are just too many places where we + internally want to use a DN that has come from a + search with extended DN enabled, or comes from a DRS + naming context. + + Enforcing this would also make debugging samba much + harder, as we'd need to use ldb_dn_minimise() in a + lot of places, and that would lose the DN string + which is so useful for working out what a request is + for +*/ +static bool ldb_dn_match_allowed(struct ldb_dn *dn, struct ldb_request *req) +{ + int num_components = ldb_dn_get_comp_num(dn); + int num_ex_components = ldb_dn_get_extended_comp_num(dn); + + if (num_ex_components == 0) { + return true; + } + + if ((num_components != 0 || num_ex_components != 1) && + ldb_req_is_untrusted(req)) { + return false; + } + return true; +} + + struct extended_dn_filter_ctx { bool test_only; bool matched; @@ -273,6 +307,20 @@ struct extended_dn_filter_ctx { }; /* + create a always non-matching node from a equality node + */ +static void set_parse_tree_false(struct ldb_parse_tree *tree) +{ + const char *attr = tree->u.equality.attr; + struct ldb_val value = tree->u.equality.value; + tree->operation = LDB_OP_EXTENDED; + tree->u.extended.attr = attr; + tree->u.extended.value = value; + tree->u.extended.rule_id = SAMBA_LDAP_MATCH_ALWAYS_FALSE; + tree->u.extended.dnAttributes = 0; +} + +/* called on all nodes in the parse tree */ static int extended_dn_filter_callback(struct ldb_parse_tree *tree, void *private_context) @@ -283,8 +331,11 @@ static int extended_dn_filter_callback(struct ldb_parse_tree *tree, void *privat const struct ldb_val *sid_val, *guid_val; const char *no_attrs[] = { NULL }; struct ldb_result *res; - const char *expression; const struct dsdb_attribute *attribute; + bool has_extended_component; + enum ldb_scope scope; + struct ldb_dn *base_dn; + const char *expression; if (tree->operation != LDB_OP_EQUALITY) { return LDB_SUCCESS; @@ -301,11 +352,10 @@ static int extended_dn_filter_callback(struct ldb_parse_tree *tree, void *privat return LDB_SUCCESS; } - /* add one_way_link check here */ + has_extended_component = (memchr(tree->u.equality.value.data, '<', + tree->u.equality.value.length) != NULL); - - if (memchr(tree->u.equality.value.data, '<', tree->u.equality.value.length) == NULL) { - /* its definately not a magic DN */ + if (!attribute->one_way_link && !has_extended_component) { return LDB_SUCCESS; } @@ -316,50 +366,73 @@ static int extended_dn_filter_callback(struct ldb_parse_tree *tree, void *privat return LDB_SUCCESS; } - sid_val = ldb_dn_get_extended_component(dn, "SID"); - guid_val = ldb_dn_get_extended_component(dn, "GUID"); - - if (sid_val == NULL && guid_val == NULL) { + if (filter_ctx->test_only) { + filter_ctx->matched = true; return LDB_SUCCESS; } - if (filter_ctx->test_only) { - filter_ctx->matched = true; + if (!ldb_dn_match_allowed(dn, filter_ctx->req)) { + /* we need to make this element of the filter always + be false */ + set_parse_tree_false(tree); return LDB_SUCCESS; } + guid_val = ldb_dn_get_extended_component(dn, "GUID"); + sid_val = ldb_dn_get_extended_component(dn, "SID"); - /* - prioritise the GUID - we have had instances of - duplicate SIDs in the database in the - ForeignSecurityPrinciples due to provision errors - */ if (guid_val) { expression = talloc_asprintf(filter_ctx, "objectGUID=%s", ldb_binary_encode(filter_ctx, *guid_val)); - } else { + scope = LDB_SCOPE_SUBTREE; + base_dn = NULL; + } else if (sid_val) { expression = talloc_asprintf(filter_ctx, "objectSID=%s", ldb_binary_encode(filter_ctx, *sid_val)); + scope = LDB_SCOPE_SUBTREE; + base_dn = NULL; + } else if (attribute->searchFlags & SEARCH_FLAG_ATTINDEX) { + /* if it is indexed, then fixing the string DN will do + no good here, as we will not find the attribute in + the index. So for now fall through to a standard DN + component comparison */ + return LDB_SUCCESS; + } else { + /* fallback to searching using the string DN as the base DN */ + expression = "objectClass=*"; + base_dn = dn; + scope = LDB_SCOPE_BASE; } ret = dsdb_module_search(filter_ctx->module, filter_ctx, &res, - NULL, - LDB_SCOPE_SUBTREE, + base_dn, + scope, no_attrs, DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE | DSDB_SEARCH_SHOW_DELETED | + DSDB_SEARCH_SHOW_EXTENDED_DN | DSDB_SEARCH_SEARCH_ALL_PARTITIONS, filter_ctx->req, "%s", expression); + if (scope == LDB_SCOPE_BASE && ret == LDB_ERR_NO_SUCH_OBJECT) { + /* note that this will need to change for multi-domain + support */ + set_parse_tree_false(tree); + return LDB_SUCCESS; + } + if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) { return LDB_SUCCESS; } + + if (res->count != 1) { return LDB_SUCCESS; } /* replace the search expression element with the matching DN */ - tree->u.equality.value.data = (uint8_t *)talloc_strdup(tree, ldb_dn_get_linearized(res->msgs[0]->dn)); + tree->u.equality.value.data = (uint8_t *)talloc_strdup(tree, + ldb_dn_get_extended_linearized(tree, res->msgs[0]->dn, 1)); if (tree->u.equality.value.data == NULL) { return ldb_oom(ldb_module_get_ctx(filter_ctx->module)); } @@ -408,6 +481,11 @@ static int extended_dn_fix_filter(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request filter_ctx->test_only = false; filter_ctx->matched = false; + req->op.search.tree = ldb_parse_tree_copy_shallow(req, req->op.search.tree); + if (req->op.search.tree == NULL) { + return ldb_oom(ldb_module_get_ctx(module)); + } + ret = ldb_parse_tree_walk(req->op.search.tree, extended_dn_filter_callback, filter_ctx); if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) { talloc_free(filter_ctx); @@ -441,9 +519,11 @@ static int extended_dn_in_fix(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request *req }; bool all_partitions = false; - ret = extended_dn_fix_filter(module, req); - if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) { - return ret; + if (req->operation == LDB_SEARCH) { + ret = extended_dn_fix_filter(module, req); + if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) { + return ret; + } } if (!ldb_dn_has_extended(dn)) { @@ -452,28 +532,8 @@ static int extended_dn_in_fix(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request *req } else { /* It looks like we need to map the DN */ const struct ldb_val *sid_val, *guid_val, *wkguid_val; - int num_components = ldb_dn_get_comp_num(dn); - int num_ex_components = ldb_dn_get_extended_comp_num(dn); - /* - windows ldap searchs don't allow a baseDN with more - than one extended component, or an extended - component and a string DN - - We only enforce this over ldap, not for internal - use, as there are just too many places where we - internally want to use a DN that has come from a - search with extended DN enabled, or comes from a DRS - naming context. - - Enforcing this would also make debugging samba much - harder, as we'd need to use ldb_dn_minimise() in a - lot of places, and that would lose the DN string - which is so useful for working out what a request is - for - */ - if ((num_components != 0 || num_ex_components != 1) && - ldb_req_is_untrusted(req)) { + if (!ldb_dn_match_allowed(dn, req)) { return ldb_error(ldb_module_get_ctx(module), LDB_ERR_INVALID_DN_SYNTAX, "invalid number of DN components"); } |