summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/source4/ldap_server
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAndrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>2006-02-22 00:26:56 +0000
committerGerald (Jerry) Carter <jerry@samba.org>2007-10-10 13:51:59 -0500
commitf490434c0f1f8e63de478c6d65f264277257968a (patch)
tree80169600acc4cb917344ce2dd951782cb61471a7 /source4/ldap_server
parent4515708b813621fa3f4a4dd7d0b08f3428cfccba (diff)
downloadsamba-f490434c0f1f8e63de478c6d65f264277257968a.tar.gz
samba-f490434c0f1f8e63de478c6d65f264277257968a.tar.bz2
samba-f490434c0f1f8e63de478c6d65f264277257968a.zip
r13606: An attempt to fix #3525.
The problem was that the supportedControls were being stolen into the result sent to the client, then talloc_free()ed. This caused them to be invalid on the next rootDSE query. This also tries to avoid attaching the result to the long-term samdb context, and avoids an extra loop in the result processing (pointed out by tridge). Andrew BARtlett (This used to be commit d0b8957f38fda4d84a318d6121ad87ba53a9ddb3)
Diffstat (limited to 'source4/ldap_server')
-rw-r--r--source4/ldap_server/ldap_backend.c20
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/source4/ldap_server/ldap_backend.c b/source4/ldap_server/ldap_backend.c
index 37e45ce3e6..1399ac18e4 100644
--- a/source4/ldap_server/ldap_backend.c
+++ b/source4/ldap_server/ldap_backend.c
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ static NTSTATUS ldapsrv_SearchRequest(struct ldapsrv_call *call)
struct ldap_Result *done;
struct ldapsrv_reply *ent_r, *done_r;
void *local_ctx;
- struct ldb_context *samdb = call->conn->ldb;
+ struct ldb_context *samdb = talloc_get_type(call->conn->ldb, struct ldb_context);
struct ldb_dn *basedn;
struct ldb_result *res = NULL;
struct ldb_request lreq;
@@ -163,13 +163,13 @@ static NTSTATUS ldapsrv_SearchRequest(struct ldapsrv_call *call)
int success_limit = 1;
int result = LDAP_SUCCESS;
int ldb_ret;
- int i, j, y;
+ int i, j;
DEBUG(10, ("SearchRequest"));
DEBUGADD(10, (" basedn: %s", req->basedn));
DEBUGADD(10, (" filter: %s\n", ldb_filter_from_tree(call, req->tree)));
- local_ctx = talloc_named(call, 0, "sldb_Search local memory context");
+ local_ctx = talloc_new(call);
NT_STATUS_HAVE_NO_MEMORY(local_ctx);
basedn = ldb_dn_explode(local_ctx, req->basedn);
@@ -228,7 +228,8 @@ static NTSTATUS ldapsrv_SearchRequest(struct ldapsrv_call *call)
ldb_ret = ldb_request(samdb, &lreq);
- res = talloc_steal(samdb, lreq.op.search.res);
+ /* Ensure we don't keep the search results around for too long */
+ res = talloc_steal(local_ctx, lreq.op.search.res);
if (ldb_ret == LDB_SUCCESS) {
for (i = 0; i < res->count; i++) {
@@ -253,14 +254,8 @@ static NTSTATUS ldapsrv_SearchRequest(struct ldapsrv_call *call)
continue;
}
ent->attributes[j].num_values = res->msgs[i]->elements[j].num_values;
- ent->attributes[j].values = talloc_array(ent->attributes,
- DATA_BLOB, ent->attributes[j].num_values);
- NT_STATUS_HAVE_NO_MEMORY(ent->attributes[j].values);
- for (y=0; y < ent->attributes[j].num_values; y++) {
- ent->attributes[j].values[y].length = res->msgs[i]->elements[j].values[y].length;
- ent->attributes[j].values[y].data = talloc_steal(ent->attributes[j].values,
- res->msgs[i]->elements[j].values[y].data);
- }
+ ent->attributes[j].values = res->msgs[i]->elements[j].values;
+ talloc_steal(ent->attributes, res->msgs[i]->elements[j].values);
}
queue_reply:
ldapsrv_queue_reply(call, ent_r);
@@ -287,6 +282,7 @@ reply:
}
if (res->controls) {
done_r->msg->controls = (struct ldap_Control **)(res->controls);
+ talloc_steal(done_r, res->controls);
}
} else {
DEBUG(10,("SearchRequest: error\n"));