r15942: Remove the sync internal ldb calls altogether.

This means that some modules have been disabled as well as they
have not been ported to the async interface

One of them is the ugly objectclass module.
I hope that the change in samldb module will make the MMC happy
without the need of this crappy module, we need proper handling
in a decent schema module.

proxy and ldb_map have also been disabled
ldb_sqlite3 need to be ported as well (currenlty just broken).
(This used to be commit 51083de795bdcbf649de926e86969adc20239b6d)

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 93 deletions

diff --git a/source4/lib/ldb/modules/rdn_name.c b/source4/lib/ldb/modules/rdn_name.c
index 2004002e38..059e7843cd 100644
--- a/source4/lib/ldb/modules/rdn_name.c
+++ b/source4/lib/ldb/modules/rdn_name.c
@@ -53,85 +53,6 @@ static struct ldb_message_element *rdn_name_find_attribute(const struct ldb_mess
 	return NULL;
 }
 
-static int rdn_name_add_sync(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request *req)
-{
-	const struct ldb_message *msg = req->op.add.message;
-	struct ldb_message *msg2;
-	struct ldb_message_element *attribute;
-	struct ldb_dn_component *rdn;
-	int i, ret;
-
-	ldb_debug(module->ldb, LDB_DEBUG_TRACE, "rdn_name_add_record\n");
-
-	/* do not manipulate our control entries */
-	if (ldb_dn_is_special(msg->dn)) {
-		return ldb_next_request(module, req);
-	}
-
-	msg2 = talloc(module, struct ldb_message);
-	if (!msg2) {
-		return -1;
-	}
-
-	msg2->dn = msg->dn;
-	msg2->num_elements = msg->num_elements;
-	msg2->private_data = msg->private_data;
-	msg2->elements = talloc_array(msg2, struct ldb_message_element, msg2->num_elements);
-	for (i = 0; i < msg2->num_elements; i++) {
-		msg2->elements[i] = msg->elements[i];
-	}
-
-	rdn = ldb_dn_get_rdn(msg2, msg2->dn);
-	if (!rdn) {
-		talloc_free(msg2);
-		return -1;
-	}
-	
-	/* Perhaps someone above us tried to set this? */
-	if ((attribute = rdn_name_find_attribute(msg, "name")) != NULL ) {
-		attribute->num_values = 0;
-	}
-
-	if (ldb_msg_add_value(msg2, "name", &rdn->value) != 0) {
-		talloc_free(msg2);
-		return -1;
-	}
-
-	attribute = rdn_name_find_attribute(msg2, rdn->name);
-
-	if (!attribute) {
-		if (ldb_msg_add_value(msg2, rdn->name, &rdn->value) != 0) {
-			talloc_free(msg2);
-			return -1;
-		}
-	} else {
-		const struct ldb_attrib_handler *handler
-			= ldb_attrib_handler(module->ldb, rdn->name);
-		for (i=0; i < attribute->num_values; i++) {
-			if (handler->comparison_fn(module->ldb, msg2, &rdn->value, &attribute->values[i]) == 0) {
-				/* overwrite so it matches in case */
-				attribute->values[i] = rdn->value;
-				break;
-			}
-		}
-		if (i == attribute->num_values) {
-			ldb_debug_set(module->ldb, LDB_DEBUG_FATAL, 
-				      "RDN mismatch on %s: %s", 
-				      ldb_dn_linearize(msg2, msg2->dn), rdn->name);
-			talloc_free(msg2);
-			return -1;
-		}
-	}
-
-	req->op.add.message = msg2;
-	ret = ldb_next_request(module, req);
-	req->op.add.message = msg;
-
-	talloc_free(msg2);
-
-	return ret;
-}
-
 static int rdn_name_add(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request *req)
 {
 	struct ldb_request *down_req;
@@ -402,24 +323,10 @@ static int rdn_name_async_wait(struct ldb_async_handle *handle, enum ldb_async_w
 	}
 }
 
-static int rdn_name_request(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request *req)
-{
-	switch (req->operation) {
-
-	case LDB_REQ_ADD:
-		return rdn_name_add_sync(module, req);
-
-	default:
-		return ldb_next_request(module, req);
-
-	}
-}
-
 static const struct ldb_module_ops rdn_name_ops = {
 	.name              = "rdn_name",
 	.add               = rdn_name_add,
 	.rename            = rdn_name_rename,
-	.request           = rdn_name_request,
 	.async_wait        = rdn_name_async_wait
 };