r601: added the server code for all the samr_SetUserInfo and samr_QueryUserInfo levels except for the password

set levels.

This means that a large part of the RPC-SAMR torture test now runs correctly against Samba4
(This used to be commit ec0a51898f543578e755207d81ed5c1524861c64)

2 files changed, 40 insertions, 22 deletions

diff --git a/source4/lib/ldb/common/ldb_msg.c b/source4/lib/ldb/common/ldb_msg.c
index 01f32751e1..59d480a33a 100644
--- a/source4/lib/ldb/common/ldb_msg.c
+++ b/source4/lib/ldb/common/ldb_msg.c
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ int ldb_msg_add(struct ldb_context *ldb,
 */
 int ldb_msg_add_value(struct ldb_context *ldb,
 		      struct ldb_message *msg, 
-		      char *attr_name,
+		      const char *attr_name,
 		      struct ldb_val *val)
 {
 	struct ldb_message_element *el;
@@ -200,51 +200,59 @@ int ldb_msg_element_compare(struct ldb_message_element *el1,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-
 /*
   convenience functions to return common types from a message
   these return the first value if the attribute is multi-valued
 */
+const struct ldb_val *ldb_msg_find_ldb_val(const struct ldb_message *msg, const char *attr_name)
+{
+	struct ldb_message_element *el = ldb_msg_find_element(msg, attr_name);
+	if (!el || el->num_values == 0) {
+		return NULL;
+	}
+	return &el->values[0];
+}
+
 int ldb_msg_find_int(const struct ldb_message *msg, 
 		     const char *attr_name,
 		     int default_value)
 {
-	struct ldb_message_element *el = ldb_msg_find_element(msg, attr_name);
-	if (!el || el->num_values == 0) {
+	const struct ldb_val *v = ldb_msg_find_ldb_val(msg, attr_name);
+	if (!v || !v->data) {
 		return default_value;
 	}
-	return strtol(el->values[0].data, NULL, 0);
+	return strtol(v->data, NULL, 0);
 }
 
 unsigned int ldb_msg_find_uint(const struct ldb_message *msg, 
 			       const char *attr_name,
 			       int default_value)
 {
-	struct ldb_message_element *el = ldb_msg_find_element(msg, attr_name);
-	if (!el || el->num_values == 0) {
+	const struct ldb_val *v = ldb_msg_find_ldb_val(msg, attr_name);
+	if (!v || !v->data) {
 		return default_value;
 	}
-	return strtoul(el->values[0].data, NULL, 0);
+	return strtoul(v->data, NULL, 0);
 }
 
 double ldb_msg_find_double(const struct ldb_message *msg, 
 			   const char *attr_name,
 			   double default_value)
 {
-	struct ldb_message_element *el = ldb_msg_find_element(msg, attr_name);
-	if (!el || el->num_values == 0) {
+	const struct ldb_val *v = ldb_msg_find_ldb_val(msg, attr_name);
+	if (!v || !v->data) {
 		return default_value;
 	}
-	return strtod(el->values[0].data, NULL);
+	return strtod(v->data, NULL);
 }
 
 const char *ldb_msg_find_string(const struct ldb_message *msg, 
 				const char *attr_name,
 				const char *default_value)
 {
-	struct ldb_message_element *el = ldb_msg_find_element(msg, attr_name);
-	if (!el || el->num_values == 0) {
+	const struct ldb_val *v = ldb_msg_find_ldb_val(msg, attr_name);
+	if (!v || !v->data) {
 		return default_value;
 	}
-	return el->values[0].data;
+	return v->data;
 }
diff --git a/source4/lib/time.c b/source4/lib/time.c
index 65b85b2180..ba650668c5 100644
--- a/source4/lib/time.c
+++ b/source4/lib/time.c
@@ -428,21 +428,31 @@ NTTIME pull_nttime(void *base, uint16 offset)
 	return ret;
 }
 
+/*
+  convert a NTTIME to a double in 100-nano-seconds since 1601
+*/
+double nttime_to_double_nt(NTTIME t)
+{
+	const double t32 = 4294967296.0;
+	return t.high*t32 + t.low;
+}
 
 /*
-  parse a nttime as a integer in a string and return a NTTIME
+  convert a double in 100-nano-seconds since 1601 to a NTTIME
 */
-NTTIME nttime_from_string(const char *s)
+NTTIME nttime_from_double_nt(double t)
 {
-	double t = 0;
 	const double t32 = 4294967296.0;
 	NTTIME ret;
-	/* i wish we could rely on 64 bit systems and sscanf %llu */
-	if (sscanf(s, "%lf", &t) != 1) {
-		ret.low = 0;
-		ret.high = 0;
-	}
 	ret.high = t / t32;
 	ret.low = t - (ret.high*t32);
 	return ret;
 }
+
+/*
+  parse a nttime as a large integer in a string and return a NTTIME
+*/
+NTTIME nttime_from_string(const char *s)
+{
+	return nttime_from_double_nt(strtod(s, NULL));
+}