summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/source4/libcli/auth/ntlmssp_parse.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAndrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>2004-05-25 14:06:28 +0000
committerGerald (Jerry) Carter <jerry@samba.org>2007-10-10 12:56:14 -0500
commit5b0ab386cb0fb74d78e6c68abe1b047ab515b7b3 (patch)
tree78f843cb6a9ff745f9ac5ef35de53bccbf1ccbd8 /source4/libcli/auth/ntlmssp_parse.c
parent579c13da43d5b40ac6d6c1436399fbc1d8dfd054 (diff)
downloadsamba-5b0ab386cb0fb74d78e6c68abe1b047ab515b7b3.tar.gz
samba-5b0ab386cb0fb74d78e6c68abe1b047ab515b7b3.tar.bz2
samba-5b0ab386cb0fb74d78e6c68abe1b047ab515b7b3.zip
r874: This patch is a pile of work on NTLMSSP:
Samba's NTLMSSP code is now fully talloc based, which should go a long way to cleaning up the memory leaks in this code. This also avoids a lot of extra copies of data, as we now allocate the 'return' blobs on a caller-supplied context. I have also been doing a lot of work towards NTLM2 signing and sealing. I have this working for sealing, but not for the verifier (MD5 integrity check on the stream) which is still incorrect. (I can aim a rpcecho sinkdata from a Win2k3 box to my server, and the data arrives intact, but the signature check fails. It does however match the test values I have...). The new torture test is cludged in - when we get a unit test suite back, I'll happliy put it in the 'right' place.... Andrew Bartlett (This used to be commit 399e2e2b1149b8d1c070aa7f0d5131c0b577d2b9)
Diffstat (limited to 'source4/libcli/auth/ntlmssp_parse.c')
-rw-r--r--source4/libcli/auth/ntlmssp_parse.c32
1 files changed, 19 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/source4/libcli/auth/ntlmssp_parse.c b/source4/libcli/auth/ntlmssp_parse.c
index 4b3043aec8..6ddaeebb06 100644
--- a/source4/libcli/auth/ntlmssp_parse.c
+++ b/source4/libcli/auth/ntlmssp_parse.c
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@
d = word (4 bytes)
C = constant ascii string
*/
-BOOL msrpc_gen(DATA_BLOB *blob,
+BOOL msrpc_gen(TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx, DATA_BLOB *blob,
const char *format, ...)
{
int i, n;
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ BOOL msrpc_gen(DATA_BLOB *blob,
va_end(ap);
/* allocate the space, then scan the format again to fill in the values */
- *blob = data_blob(NULL, head_size + data_size);
+ *blob = data_blob_talloc(mem_ctx, NULL, head_size + data_size);
head_ofs = 0;
data_ofs = head_size;
@@ -182,12 +182,12 @@ if ((head_ofs + amount) > blob->length) { \
C = constant ascii string
*/
-BOOL msrpc_parse(const DATA_BLOB *blob,
+BOOL msrpc_parse(TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx, const DATA_BLOB *blob,
const char *format, ...)
{
int i;
va_list ap;
- char **ps, *s;
+ const char **ps, *s;
DATA_BLOB *b;
size_t head_ofs = 0;
uint16 len1, len2;
@@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ BOOL msrpc_parse(const DATA_BLOB *blob,
ps = va_arg(ap, char **);
if (len1 == 0 && len2 == 0) {
- *ps = smb_xstrdup("");
+ *ps = "";
} else {
/* make sure its in the right format - be strict */
if ((len1 != len2) || (ptr + len1 < ptr) || (ptr + len1 < len1) || (ptr + len1 > blob->length)) {
@@ -223,9 +223,12 @@ BOOL msrpc_parse(const DATA_BLOB *blob,
pull_string(NULL, p, blob->data + ptr, sizeof(p),
len1,
STR_UNICODE|STR_NOALIGN);
- (*ps) = smb_xstrdup(p);
+ (*ps) = talloc_strdup(mem_ctx, p);
+ if (!(*ps)) {
+ return False;
+ }
} else {
- (*ps) = smb_xstrdup("");
+ (*ps) = "";
}
}
break;
@@ -238,7 +241,7 @@ BOOL msrpc_parse(const DATA_BLOB *blob,
ps = va_arg(ap, char **);
/* make sure its in the right format - be strict */
if (len1 == 0 && len2 == 0) {
- *ps = smb_xstrdup("");
+ *ps = "";
} else {
if ((len1 != len2) || (ptr + len1 < ptr) || (ptr + len1 < len1) || (ptr + len1 > blob->length)) {
return False;
@@ -251,9 +254,12 @@ BOOL msrpc_parse(const DATA_BLOB *blob,
pull_string(NULL, p, blob->data + ptr, sizeof(p),
len1,
STR_ASCII|STR_NOALIGN);
- (*ps) = smb_xstrdup(p);
+ (*ps) = talloc_strdup(mem_ctx, p);
+ if (!(*ps)) {
+ return False;
+ }
} else {
- (*ps) = smb_xstrdup("");
+ (*ps) = "";
}
}
break;
@@ -265,7 +271,7 @@ BOOL msrpc_parse(const DATA_BLOB *blob,
b = (DATA_BLOB *)va_arg(ap, void *);
if (len1 == 0 && len2 == 0) {
- *b = data_blob(NULL, 0);
+ *b = data_blob_talloc(mem_ctx, NULL, 0);
} else {
/* make sure its in the right format - be strict */
if ((len1 != len2) || (ptr + len1 < ptr) || (ptr + len1 < len1) || (ptr + len1 > blob->length)) {
@@ -275,7 +281,7 @@ BOOL msrpc_parse(const DATA_BLOB *blob,
if (blob->data + ptr < (uint8 *)ptr || blob->data + ptr < blob->data)
return False;
- *b = data_blob(blob->data + ptr, len1);
+ *b = data_blob_talloc(mem_ctx, blob->data + ptr, len1);
}
break;
case 'b':
@@ -286,7 +292,7 @@ BOOL msrpc_parse(const DATA_BLOB *blob,
if (blob->data + head_ofs < (uint8 *)head_ofs || blob->data + head_ofs < blob->data)
return False;
- *b = data_blob(blob->data + head_ofs, len1);
+ *b = data_blob_talloc(mem_ctx, blob->data + head_ofs, len1);
head_ofs += len1;
break;
case 'd':