diff options
author | Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> | 2008-08-26 09:49:54 +1000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> | 2008-08-26 09:49:54 +1000 |
commit | 291b0dfb2a9cfff94e21c9cd17aa00345219765c (patch) | |
tree | 2e3ec9fb7a09b96869a872ba60f1f89a1ffd92d4 /source4/torture | |
parent | 9eacc3a8f396e74b0deed193f0f2ecffa3ba8e93 (diff) | |
download | samba-291b0dfb2a9cfff94e21c9cd17aa00345219765c.tar.gz samba-291b0dfb2a9cfff94e21c9cd17aa00345219765c.tar.bz2 samba-291b0dfb2a9cfff94e21c9cd17aa00345219765c.zip |
Update RPC-LSA to (almost) pass against Windows 2008.
(This used to be commit a17cb558c23142e522de3ed56d65c7694477395f)
Diffstat (limited to 'source4/torture')
-rw-r--r-- | source4/torture/rpc/lsa.c | 106 |
1 files changed, 61 insertions, 45 deletions
diff --git a/source4/torture/rpc/lsa.c b/source4/torture/rpc/lsa.c index 4fb459ea25..98cbf12e68 100644 --- a/source4/torture/rpc/lsa.c +++ b/source4/torture/rpc/lsa.c @@ -614,7 +614,8 @@ bool test_many_LookupSids(struct dcerpc_pipe *p, if (!test_LookupNames(p, mem_ctx, handle, &names)) { return false; } - } else { + } else if (p->conn->security_state.auth_info->auth_type == DCERPC_AUTH_TYPE_SCHANNEL && + p->conn->security_state.auth_info->auth_level >= DCERPC_AUTH_LEVEL_INTEGRITY) { struct lsa_LookupSids3 r; struct lsa_TransNameArray2 names; @@ -884,6 +885,26 @@ static bool test_Delete(struct dcerpc_pipe *p, r.in.handle = handle; status = dcerpc_lsa_Delete(p, mem_ctx, &r); + if (!NT_STATUS_EQUAL(status, NT_STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED)) { + printf("Delete should have failed NT_STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED - %s\n", nt_errstr(status)); + return false; + } + + return true; +} + +static bool test_DeleteObject(struct dcerpc_pipe *p, + TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx, + struct policy_handle *handle) +{ + NTSTATUS status; + struct lsa_DeleteObject r; + + printf("testing DeleteObject\n"); + + r.in.handle = handle; + r.out.handle = handle; + status = dcerpc_lsa_DeleteObject(p, mem_ctx, &r); if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) { printf("Delete failed - %s\n", nt_errstr(status)); return false; @@ -912,7 +933,19 @@ static bool test_CreateAccount(struct dcerpc_pipe *p, r.out.acct_handle = &acct_handle; status = dcerpc_lsa_CreateAccount(p, mem_ctx, &r); - if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) { + if (NT_STATUS_EQUAL(status, NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_COLLISION)) { + struct lsa_OpenAccount r_o; + r_o.in.handle = handle; + r_o.in.sid = newsid; + r_o.in.access_mask = SEC_FLAG_MAXIMUM_ALLOWED; + r_o.out.acct_handle = &acct_handle; + + status = dcerpc_lsa_OpenAccount(p, mem_ctx, &r_o); + if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) { + printf("OpenAccount failed - %s\n", nt_errstr(status)); + return false; + } + } else if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) { printf("CreateAccount failed - %s\n", nt_errstr(status)); return false; } @@ -921,6 +954,10 @@ static bool test_CreateAccount(struct dcerpc_pipe *p, return false; } + if (!test_DeleteObject(p, mem_ctx, &acct_handle)) { + return false; + } + return true; } @@ -948,6 +985,10 @@ static bool test_DeleteTrustedDomain(struct dcerpc_pipe *p, return false; } + if (!test_DeleteObject(p, mem_ctx, &trustdom_handle)) { + return false; + } + return true; } @@ -986,7 +1027,7 @@ static bool test_CreateSecret(struct dcerpc_pipe *p, struct lsa_SetSecret r7; struct lsa_QuerySecret r8; struct policy_handle sec_handle, sec_handle2, sec_handle3; - struct lsa_Delete d; + struct lsa_DeleteObject d_o; struct lsa_DATA_BUF buf1; struct lsa_DATA_BUF_PTR bufp1; struct lsa_DATA_BUF_PTR bufp2; @@ -1245,35 +1286,16 @@ static bool test_CreateSecret(struct dcerpc_pipe *p, if (!r8.out.new_val || !r8.out.old_val) { printf("in/out pointers not returned, despite being set on in for QuerySecret\n"); ret = false; - } else if (r8.out.new_val->buf == NULL) { - if (i != LOCAL) { - printf("NEW secret buffer not returned after GLOBAL OLD set\n"); - ret = false; - } + } else if (r8.out.new_val->buf != NULL) { + printf("NEW secret buffer must not be returned after OLD set\n"); + ret = false; } else if (r8.out.old_val->buf == NULL) { - printf("OLD secret buffer not returned after OLD set\n"); + printf("OLD secret buffer was not returned after OLD set\n"); ret = false; } else if (r8.out.new_mtime == NULL || r8.out.old_mtime == NULL) { printf("Both times not returned after OLD set\n"); ret = false; } else { - if (i == LOCAL) { - printf("NEW secret buffer should not be returned after LOCAL OLD set\n"); - ret = false; - } - blob1.data = r8.out.new_val->buf->data; - blob1.length = r8.out.new_val->buf->length; - - blob2 = data_blob_talloc(mem_ctx, NULL, blob1.length); - - secret6 = sess_decrypt_string(mem_ctx, - &blob1, &session_key); - - if (strcmp(secret3, secret4) != 0) { - printf("Returned NEW secret '%s' doesn't match '%s'\n", secret4, secret3); - ret = false; - } - blob1.data = r8.out.old_val->buf->data; blob1.length = r8.out.old_val->buf->size; @@ -1287,14 +1309,7 @@ static bool test_CreateSecret(struct dcerpc_pipe *p, ret = false; } - if (*r8.out.new_mtime == *r8.out.old_mtime) { - if (i != GLOBAL) { - printf("Returned secret %s had same mtime for both secrets: %s\n", - secname[i], - nt_time_string(mem_ctx, *r8.out.new_mtime)); - ret = false; - } - } else { + if (*r8.out.new_mtime != *r8.out.old_mtime) { printf("Returned secret %s should have had same mtime for both secrets: %s != %s\n", secname[i], nt_time_string(mem_ctx, *r8.out.old_mtime), @@ -1308,8 +1323,13 @@ static bool test_CreateSecret(struct dcerpc_pipe *p, ret = false; } - d.in.handle = &sec_handle2; - status = dcerpc_lsa_Delete(p, mem_ctx, &d); + if (!test_DeleteObject(p, mem_ctx, &sec_handle)) { + return false; + } + + d_o.in.handle = &sec_handle2; + d_o.out.handle = &sec_handle2; + status = dcerpc_lsa_DeleteObject(p, mem_ctx, &d_o); if (!NT_STATUS_EQUAL(status, NT_STATUS_INVALID_HANDLE)) { printf("Second delete expected INVALID_HANDLE - %s\n", nt_errstr(status)); ret = false; @@ -1454,9 +1474,9 @@ static bool test_EnumAccounts(struct dcerpc_pipe *p, return false; } - if (!test_LookupSids3(p, mem_ctx, &sids1)) { - return false; - } + /* Can't test lookupSids3 here, as clearly we must not + * be on schannel, or we would not be able to do the + * rest */ printf("testing all accounts\n"); for (i=0;i<sids1.num_sids;i++) { @@ -1667,8 +1687,8 @@ static bool test_query_each_TrustDom(struct dcerpc_pipe *p, struct policy_handle handle2; struct lsa_Close c; struct lsa_CloseTrustedDomainEx c_trust; - int levels [] = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12}; - int ok[] = {1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1}; + int levels [] = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13}; + int ok[] = {1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1}; if (domains->domains[i].sid) { trust.in.handle = handle; @@ -1912,8 +1932,6 @@ static bool test_EnumTrustDom(struct dcerpc_pipe *p, r_ex.in.max_size, LSA_ENUM_TRUST_DOMAIN_EX_MULTIPLIER, r_ex.in.max_size / LSA_ENUM_TRUST_DOMAIN_EX_MULTIPLIER); - ret = false; - exit(1); } } else if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(enum_status)) { printf("EnumTrustedDomainEx failed - %s\n", nt_errstr(enum_status)); @@ -2311,11 +2329,9 @@ bool torture_rpc_lsa(struct torture_context *tctx) ret = false; } -#if 0 if (!test_Delete(p, tctx, handle)) { ret = false; } -#endif if (!test_many_LookupSids(p, tctx, handle)) { ret = false; |