Show that the NTLOGON and NETLOGON mailslots are *very* similar.

Rework the mailslot infrustructure to cope, passing down the mailslot
name so that we can implement both in the same callback function.

Andrew Bartlett
(This used to be commit 89fdd77891529aa74bb920994b8b5959aae8ac2d)

1 files changed, 25 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/source4/torture/nbt/dgram.c b/source4/torture/nbt/dgram.c
index 38cc20b3b9..ce5758977d 100644
--- a/source4/torture/nbt/dgram.c
+++ b/source4/torture/nbt/dgram.c
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
 */
 static void netlogon_handler(struct dgram_mailslot_handler *dgmslot, 
 			     struct nbt_dgram_packet *packet, 
+			     const char *mailslot_name,
 			     struct socket_address *src)
 {
 	NTSTATUS status;
@@ -378,6 +379,30 @@ static bool nbt_test_ntlogon(struct torture_context *tctx)
 		event_loop_once(dgmsock->event_ctx);
 	}
 
+	ZERO_STRUCT(logon);
+	logon.command = LOGON_PRIMARY_QUERY;
+	logon.req.pdc.computer_name = TEST_NAME;
+	logon.req.pdc.mailslot_name = dgmslot->mailslot_name;
+	logon.req.pdc.unicode_name  = TEST_NAME;
+	logon.req.pdc.nt_version    = 1;
+	logon.req.pdc.lmnt_token    = 0xFFFF;
+	logon.req.pdc.lm20_token    = 0xFFFF;
+
+	make_nbt_name_client(&myname, TEST_NAME);
+
+	dest = socket_address_from_strings(dgmsock, dgmsock->sock->backend_name, 
+					   address, lp_dgram_port(tctx->lp_ctx));
+	torture_assert(tctx, dest != NULL, "Error getting address");
+	status = dgram_mailslot_netlogon_send(dgmsock, 
+					      &name, dest, 
+					      NBT_MAILSLOT_NTLOGON, 
+					      &myname, &logon);
+	torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(tctx, status, "Failed to send ntlogon request");
+
+	while (timeval_elapsed(&tv) < 5 && replies == 0) {
+		event_loop_once(dgmsock->event_ctx);
+	}
+
 	torture_leave_domain(join_ctx);
 	return true;
 }