addition of samr_SetSecurity() from kai

we needed to adjust the alignment of [relative] buffers for this to
work. I wonder if they are always 4 byte aligned?
(This used to be commit 9cd0a0b8b976e62c6da71b7e55cba5b38483620d)

1 files changed, 17 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/source4/torture/rpc/samr.c b/source4/torture/rpc/samr.c
index e5e4493480..f77b7ebde4 100644
--- a/source4/torture/rpc/samr.c
+++ b/source4/torture/rpc/samr.c
@@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ static BOOL test_QuerySecurity(struct dcerpc_pipe *p, TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx,
 {
 	NTSTATUS status;
 	struct samr_QuerySecurity r;
+	struct samr_SetSecurity s;
 
 	r.in.handle = handle;
 	r.in.sec_info = 7;
@@ -73,6 +74,22 @@ static BOOL test_QuerySecurity(struct dcerpc_pipe *p, TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx,
 		return False;
 	}
 
+	s.in.handle = handle;
+	s.in.sec_info = 7;
+	s.in.sdbuf = r.out.sdbuf;
+
+	status = dcerpc_samr_SetSecurity(p, mem_ctx, &s);
+	if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) {
+		printf("SetSecurity failed - %s\n", nt_errstr(status));
+		return False;
+	}
+
+	status = dcerpc_samr_QuerySecurity(p, mem_ctx, &r);
+	if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) {
+		printf("QuerySecurity failed - %s\n", nt_errstr(status));
+		return False;
+	}
+
 	return True;
 }