summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/source4
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMatthias Dieter Wallnöfer <mdw@samba.org>2011-10-12 17:58:37 +0200
committerMatthias Dieter Wallnöfer <mdw@samba.org>2011-10-27 18:52:29 +0200
commit184c17587c49a43e45cda66c6547544c2424ae52 (patch)
tree0ab1d1f670408d95df27dd34410436841af5e1b2 /source4
parent68b3770c45507070af02c110dd540322c61a65f4 (diff)
downloadsamba-184c17587c49a43e45cda66c6547544c2424ae52.tar.gz
samba-184c17587c49a43e45cda66c6547544c2424ae52.tar.bz2
samba-184c17587c49a43e45cda66c6547544c2424ae52.zip
s4:objectclass LDB module - objectclass modify operations
According to bug #8486 the modification to direct related structural object classes is possible (equal, child, parent). Reviewed-by: abartlet
Diffstat (limited to 'source4')
-rw-r--r--source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/objectclass.c127
1 files changed, 32 insertions, 95 deletions
diff --git a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/objectclass.c b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/objectclass.c
index cf40f35ae7..c854d30cf1 100644
--- a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/objectclass.c
+++ b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/objectclass.c
@@ -993,7 +993,7 @@ static int objectclass_do_mod(struct oc_context *ac)
struct class_list *sorted, *current;
const struct dsdb_class *objectclass;
unsigned int i, j, k;
- bool found, replace = false;
+ bool found;
int ret;
ldb = ldb_module_get_ctx(ac->module);
@@ -1062,50 +1062,18 @@ static int objectclass_do_mod(struct oc_context *ac)
++(oc_el_entry->num_values);
}
- objectclass = get_last_structural_class(ac->schema,
- oc_el_change, ac->req);
- if (objectclass != NULL) {
- ldb_asprintf_errstring(ldb,
- "objectclass: cannot add a new top-most structural objectclass '%s'!",
- objectclass->lDAPDisplayName);
- talloc_free(mem_ctx);
- return LDB_ERR_OBJECT_CLASS_VIOLATION;
- }
-
- /* Now do the sorting */
- ret = objectclass_sort(ac->module, ac->schema, mem_ctx,
- oc_el_entry, &sorted);
- if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) {
- talloc_free(mem_ctx);
- return ret;
- }
-
break;
case LDB_FLAG_MOD_REPLACE:
- /* Do the sorting for the change message element */
- ret = objectclass_sort(ac->module, ac->schema, mem_ctx,
- oc_el_change, &sorted);
- if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) {
- talloc_free(mem_ctx);
- return ret;
- }
-
- /* this is a replace */
- replace = true;
+ /*
+ * In this case the new "oc_el_entry" is simply
+ * "oc_el_change"
+ */
+ oc_el_entry = oc_el_change;
break;
case LDB_FLAG_MOD_DELETE:
- /* get the actual top-most structural objectclass */
- objectclass = get_last_structural_class(ac->schema,
- oc_el_entry, ac->req);
- if (objectclass == NULL) {
- /* no structural objectclass? */
- talloc_free(mem_ctx);
- return ldb_operr(ldb);
- }
-
/* Merge the two message elements */
for (i = 0; i < oc_el_change->num_values; i++) {
found = false;
@@ -1137,40 +1105,40 @@ static int objectclass_do_mod(struct oc_context *ac)
}
}
- /* Make sure that the top-most structural object class
- * hasn't been deleted */
- found = false;
- for (i = 0; i < oc_el_entry->num_values; i++) {
- if (ldb_attr_cmp(objectclass->lDAPDisplayName,
- (char *)oc_el_entry->values[i].data) == 0) {
- found = true;
- break;
- }
- }
- if (!found) {
- ldb_asprintf_errstring(ldb,
- "objectclass: cannot delete the top-most structural objectclass '%s'!",
- objectclass->lDAPDisplayName);
- talloc_free(mem_ctx);
- return LDB_ERR_OBJECT_CLASS_VIOLATION;
- }
+ break;
+ }
- /* Now do the sorting */
- ret = objectclass_sort(ac->module, ac->schema, mem_ctx,
- oc_el_entry, &sorted);
- if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) {
- talloc_free(mem_ctx);
- return ret;
- }
+ /* Get the new top-most structural object class */
+ objectclass = get_last_structural_class(ac->schema, oc_el_entry,
+ ac->req);
+ if (objectclass == NULL) {
+ ldb_set_errstring(ldb,
+ "objectclass: cannot delete all structural objectclasses!");
+ talloc_free(mem_ctx);
+ return LDB_ERR_OBJECT_CLASS_VIOLATION;
+ }
- break;
+ ret = check_unrelated_objectclasses(ac->module, ac->schema,
+ objectclass,
+ oc_el_entry);
+ if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) {
+ talloc_free(mem_ctx);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ /* Now do the sorting */
+ ret = objectclass_sort(ac->module, ac->schema, mem_ctx,
+ oc_el_entry, &sorted);
+ if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) {
+ talloc_free(mem_ctx);
+ return ret;
}
/* (Re)-add an empty "objectClass" attribute on the object
* classes change message "msg". */
ldb_msg_remove_attr(msg, "objectClass");
ret = ldb_msg_add_empty(msg, "objectClass",
- LDB_FLAG_MOD_REPLACE, &oc_el_change);
+ LDB_FLAG_MOD_REPLACE, &oc_el_entry);
if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) {
talloc_free(mem_ctx);
return ret;
@@ -1192,37 +1160,6 @@ static int objectclass_do_mod(struct oc_context *ac)
return ret;
}
}
-
- if (replace) {
- /* Well, on replace we are nearly done: we have to test
- * if the change and entry message element are identical
- * ly. We can use "ldb_msg_element_compare" since now
- * the specified objectclasses match for sure in case.
- */
- ret = ldb_msg_element_compare(oc_el_entry,
- oc_el_change);
- if (ret == 0) {
- ret = ldb_msg_element_compare(oc_el_change,
- oc_el_entry);
- }
- if (ret == 0) {
- /* they are the same so we are done in this
- * case */
- talloc_free(mem_ctx);
- return ldb_module_done(ac->req, NULL, NULL,
- LDB_SUCCESS);
- } else {
- ldb_set_errstring(ldb,
- "objectclass: the specified objectclasses are not exactly the same as on the entry!");
- talloc_free(mem_ctx);
- return LDB_ERR_OBJECT_CLASS_VIOLATION;
- }
- }
-
- /* Now we've applied all changes from "oc_el_change" to
- * "oc_el_entry" therefore the new "oc_el_entry" will be
- * "oc_el_change". */
- oc_el_entry = oc_el_change;
}
talloc_free(mem_ctx);