diff options
author | Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> | 2012-02-03 18:03:10 +1100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> | 2012-03-04 23:33:05 +0100 |
commit | d7bb961859a3501aec4d28842bfffb6190d19a73 (patch) | |
tree | e472b543e1e88914fbcf7bf68a3e431ff7314afd /source4 | |
parent | acfa107ec64ceb6bf3a28df14585cfb0ccc79f41 (diff) | |
download | samba-d7bb961859a3501aec4d28842bfffb6190d19a73.tar.gz samba-d7bb961859a3501aec4d28842bfffb6190d19a73.tar.bz2 samba-d7bb961859a3501aec4d28842bfffb6190d19a73.zip |
s3-auth: Remove security=share (depricated since 3.6).
This patch removes security=share, which Samba implemented by matching
the per-share password provided by the client in the Tree Connect with
a selection of usernames supplied by the client, the smb.conf or
guessed from the environment.
The rationale for the removal is that for the bulk of security=share
users, we just we need a very simple way to run a 'trust the network'
Samba server, where users mark shares as guest ok. This is still
supported, and the smb.conf options are documented at
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Public_Samba_Server
At the same time, this closes the door on one of the most arcane areas
of Samba authentication.
Naturally, full user-name/password authentication remain available in
security=user and above.
This includes documentation updates for username and only user, which
now only do a small amount of what they used to do.
Andrew Bartlett
--------------
/ \
/ REST \
/ IN \
/ PEACE \
/ \
| SEC_SHARE |
| security=share |
| |
| |
| 5 March |
| |
| 2012 |
*| * * * | *
_________)/\\_//(\/(/\)/\//\/\///|_)_______
Diffstat (limited to 'source4')
-rw-r--r-- | source4/param/tests/loadparm.c | 10 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/source4/param/tests/loadparm.c b/source4/param/tests/loadparm.c index 5f27439912..a8a6d78866 100644 --- a/source4/param/tests/loadparm.c +++ b/source4/param/tests/loadparm.c @@ -237,15 +237,6 @@ static bool test_server_role_security_domain(struct torture_context *tctx) return true; } -static bool test_server_role_security_share(struct torture_context *tctx) -{ - struct loadparm_context *lp_ctx = loadparm_init(tctx); - torture_assert(tctx, lpcfg_set_option(lp_ctx, "security=share"), "lpcfg_set_option failed"); - torture_assert_int_equal(tctx, lpcfg_server_role(lp_ctx), ROLE_STANDALONE, "ROLE should be STANDALONE"); - torture_assert_int_equal(tctx, lpcfg_security(lp_ctx), SEC_SHARE, "security should be share"); - return true; -} - static bool test_server_role_security_server(struct torture_context *tctx) { struct loadparm_context *lp_ctx = loadparm_init(tctx); @@ -282,7 +273,6 @@ struct torture_suite *torture_local_loadparm(TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx) torture_suite_add_simple_test(suite, "test_server_role_dc_domain_logons_and_not_master", test_server_role_dc_domain_logons_and_not_master); torture_suite_add_simple_test(suite, "test_server_role_security_ads", test_server_role_security_ads); torture_suite_add_simple_test(suite, "test_server_role_security_domain", test_server_role_security_domain); - torture_suite_add_simple_test(suite, "test_server_role_security_share", test_server_role_security_share); torture_suite_add_simple_test(suite, "test_server_role_security_server", test_server_role_security_server); return suite; |