summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat
-rw-r--r--source4/torture/rpc/handles.c89
1 files changed, 53 insertions, 36 deletions
diff --git a/source4/torture/rpc/handles.c b/source4/torture/rpc/handles.c
index 8449fba5f1..ee41ce67dd 100644
--- a/source4/torture/rpc/handles.c
+++ b/source4/torture/rpc/handles.c
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ static bool test_handles_lsa(struct torture_context *torture)
{
NTSTATUS status;
struct dcerpc_pipe *p1, *p2;
+ struct dcerpc_binding_handle *b1, *b2;
struct policy_handle handle;
struct policy_handle handle2;
struct lsa_ObjectAttribute attr;
@@ -46,9 +47,11 @@ static bool test_handles_lsa(struct torture_context *torture)
status = torture_rpc_connection(torture, &p1, &ndr_table_lsarpc);
torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, status, "opening lsa pipe1");
+ b1 = p1->binding_handle;
status = torture_rpc_connection(torture, &p2, &ndr_table_lsarpc);
torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, status, "opening lsa pipe1");
+ b2 = p2->binding_handle;
qos.len = 0;
qos.impersonation_level = 2;
@@ -67,7 +70,7 @@ static bool test_handles_lsa(struct torture_context *torture)
r.in.access_mask = SEC_FLAG_MAXIMUM_ALLOWED;
r.out.handle = &handle;
- status = dcerpc_lsa_OpenPolicy(p1, mem_ctx, &r);
+ status = dcerpc_lsa_OpenPolicy_r(b1, mem_ctx, &r);
if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) {
torture_comment(torture, "lsa_OpenPolicy not supported - skipping\n");
talloc_free(mem_ctx);
@@ -77,16 +80,16 @@ static bool test_handles_lsa(struct torture_context *torture)
c.in.handle = &handle;
c.out.handle = &handle2;
- status = dcerpc_lsa_Close(p2, mem_ctx, &c);
+ status = dcerpc_lsa_Close_r(b2, mem_ctx, &c);
torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_NET_WRITE_FAULT,
"closing policy handle on p2");
torture_assert_int_equal(torture, p2->last_fault_code, DCERPC_FAULT_CONTEXT_MISMATCH,
"closing policy handle on p2");
- status = dcerpc_lsa_Close(p1, mem_ctx, &c);
+ status = dcerpc_lsa_Close_r(b1, mem_ctx, &c);
torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, status, "closing policy handle on p1");
- status = dcerpc_lsa_Close(p1, mem_ctx, &c);
+ status = dcerpc_lsa_Close_r(b1, mem_ctx, &c);
torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_NET_WRITE_FAULT,
"closing policy handle on p1 again");
torture_assert_int_equal(torture, p1->last_fault_code, DCERPC_FAULT_CONTEXT_MISMATCH,
@@ -101,6 +104,7 @@ static bool test_handles_lsa_shared(struct torture_context *torture)
{
NTSTATUS status;
struct dcerpc_pipe *p1, *p2, *p3, *p4, *p5;
+ struct dcerpc_binding_handle *b1, *b2, *b3, *b4;
struct policy_handle handle;
struct policy_handle handle2;
struct lsa_ObjectAttribute attr;
@@ -119,6 +123,7 @@ static bool test_handles_lsa_shared(struct torture_context *torture)
torture_comment(torture, "connect lsa pipe1\n");
status = torture_rpc_connection(torture, &p1, &ndr_table_lsarpc);
torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, status, "opening lsa pipe1");
+ b1 = p1->binding_handle;
transport = p1->conn->transport.transport;
assoc_group_id = p1->assoc_group_id;
@@ -130,6 +135,7 @@ static bool test_handles_lsa_shared(struct torture_context *torture)
transport,
assoc_group_id);
torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, status, "opening lsa pipe2");
+ b2 = p2->binding_handle;
torture_comment(torture, "got assoc_group_id[0x%08X] for p2\n",
p2->assoc_group_id);
@@ -152,7 +158,7 @@ static bool test_handles_lsa_shared(struct torture_context *torture)
r.out.handle = &handle;
torture_comment(torture, "open lsa policy handle\n");
- status = dcerpc_lsa_OpenPolicy(p1, mem_ctx, &r);
+ status = dcerpc_lsa_OpenPolicy_r(b1, mem_ctx, &r);
if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) {
torture_comment(torture, "lsa_OpenPolicy not supported - skipping\n");
talloc_free(mem_ctx);
@@ -167,6 +173,7 @@ static bool test_handles_lsa_shared(struct torture_context *torture)
transport,
assoc_group_id);
torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, status, "opening lsa pipe3");
+ b3 = p3->binding_handle;
qsec.in.handle = &handle;
qsec.in.sec_info = 0;
@@ -178,15 +185,15 @@ static bool test_handles_lsa_shared(struct torture_context *torture)
* use policy handle on all 3 connections
*/
torture_comment(torture, "use the policy handle on p1,p2,p3\n");
- status = dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity(p1, mem_ctx, &qsec);
+ status = dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity_r(b1, mem_ctx, &qsec);
torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_OK,
"use policy handle on p1");
- status = dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity(p2, mem_ctx, &qsec);
+ status = dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity_r(b2, mem_ctx, &qsec);
torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_OK,
"use policy handle on p2");
- status = dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity(p3, mem_ctx, &qsec);
+ status = dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity_r(b3, mem_ctx, &qsec);
torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_OK,
"use policy handle on p3");
@@ -194,23 +201,23 @@ static bool test_handles_lsa_shared(struct torture_context *torture)
* close policy handle on connection 2 and the others get a fault
*/
torture_comment(torture, "close the policy handle on p2 others get a fault\n");
- status = dcerpc_lsa_Close(p2, mem_ctx, &c);
+ status = dcerpc_lsa_Close_r(b2, mem_ctx, &c);
torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_OK,
"closing policy handle on p2");
- status = dcerpc_lsa_Close(p1, mem_ctx, &c);
+ status = dcerpc_lsa_Close_r(b1, mem_ctx, &c);
torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_NET_WRITE_FAULT,
"closing policy handle on p1 again");
torture_assert_int_equal(torture, p1->last_fault_code, DCERPC_FAULT_CONTEXT_MISMATCH,
"closing policy handle on p1 again");
- status = dcerpc_lsa_Close(p3, mem_ctx, &c);
+ status = dcerpc_lsa_Close_r(b3, mem_ctx, &c);
torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_NET_WRITE_FAULT,
"closing policy handle on p3");
torture_assert_int_equal(torture, p3->last_fault_code, DCERPC_FAULT_CONTEXT_MISMATCH,
"closing policy handle on p3");
- status = dcerpc_lsa_Close(p2, mem_ctx, &c);
+ status = dcerpc_lsa_Close_r(b2, mem_ctx, &c);
torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_NET_WRITE_FAULT,
"closing policy handle on p2 again");
torture_assert_int_equal(torture, p2->last_fault_code, DCERPC_FAULT_CONTEXT_MISMATCH,
@@ -220,7 +227,7 @@ static bool test_handles_lsa_shared(struct torture_context *torture)
* open a new policy handle on p3
*/
torture_comment(torture, "open a new policy handle on p3\n");
- status = dcerpc_lsa_OpenPolicy(p3, mem_ctx, &r);
+ status = dcerpc_lsa_OpenPolicy_r(b3, mem_ctx, &r);
torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_OK,
"open policy handle on p3");
@@ -228,15 +235,15 @@ static bool test_handles_lsa_shared(struct torture_context *torture)
* use policy handle on all 3 connections
*/
torture_comment(torture, "use the policy handle on p1,p2,p3\n");
- status = dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity(p1, mem_ctx, &qsec);
+ status = dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity_r(b1, mem_ctx, &qsec);
torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_OK,
"use policy handle on p1");
- status = dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity(p2, mem_ctx, &qsec);
+ status = dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity_r(b2, mem_ctx, &qsec);
torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_OK,
"use policy handle on p2");
- status = dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity(p3, mem_ctx, &qsec);
+ status = dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity_r(b3, mem_ctx, &qsec);
torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_OK,
"use policy handle on p3");
@@ -244,23 +251,23 @@ static bool test_handles_lsa_shared(struct torture_context *torture)
* close policy handle on connection 2 and the others get a fault
*/
torture_comment(torture, "close the policy handle on p2 others get a fault\n");
- status = dcerpc_lsa_Close(p2, mem_ctx, &c);
+ status = dcerpc_lsa_Close_r(b2, mem_ctx, &c);
torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_OK,
"closing policy handle on p2");
- status = dcerpc_lsa_Close(p1, mem_ctx, &c);
+ status = dcerpc_lsa_Close_r(b1, mem_ctx, &c);
torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_NET_WRITE_FAULT,
"closing policy handle on p1 again");
torture_assert_int_equal(torture, p1->last_fault_code, DCERPC_FAULT_CONTEXT_MISMATCH,
"closing policy handle on p1 again");
- status = dcerpc_lsa_Close(p3, mem_ctx, &c);
+ status = dcerpc_lsa_Close_r(b3, mem_ctx, &c);
torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_NET_WRITE_FAULT,
"closing policy handle on p3");
torture_assert_int_equal(torture, p3->last_fault_code, DCERPC_FAULT_CONTEXT_MISMATCH,
"closing policy handle on p3");
- status = dcerpc_lsa_Close(p2, mem_ctx, &c);
+ status = dcerpc_lsa_Close_r(b2, mem_ctx, &c);
torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_NET_WRITE_FAULT,
"closing policy handle on p2 again");
torture_assert_int_equal(torture, p2->last_fault_code, DCERPC_FAULT_CONTEXT_MISMATCH,
@@ -270,11 +277,11 @@ static bool test_handles_lsa_shared(struct torture_context *torture)
* open a new policy handle
*/
torture_comment(torture, "open a new policy handle on p1 and use it\n");
- status = dcerpc_lsa_OpenPolicy(p1, mem_ctx, &r);
+ status = dcerpc_lsa_OpenPolicy_r(b1, mem_ctx, &r);
torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_OK,
"open 2nd policy handle on p1");
- status = dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity(p1, mem_ctx, &qsec);
+ status = dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity_r(b1, mem_ctx, &qsec);
torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_OK,
"QuerySecurity handle on p1");
@@ -287,11 +294,11 @@ static bool test_handles_lsa_shared(struct torture_context *torture)
* and it's still available on p2,p3
*/
torture_comment(torture, "use policy handle on p2,p3\n");
- status = dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity(p2, mem_ctx, &qsec);
+ status = dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity_r(b2, mem_ctx, &qsec);
torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_OK,
"QuerySecurity handle on p2 after p1 was disconnected");
- status = dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity(p3, mem_ctx, &qsec);
+ status = dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity_r(b3, mem_ctx, &qsec);
torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_OK,
"QuerySecurity handle on p3 after p1 was disconnected");
@@ -304,8 +311,9 @@ static bool test_handles_lsa_shared(struct torture_context *torture)
transport,
assoc_group_id);
torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, status, "opening lsa pipe4");
+ b4 = p4->binding_handle;
- status = dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity(p4, mem_ctx, &qsec);
+ status = dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity_r(b4, mem_ctx, &qsec);
torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_OK,
"using policy handle on p4");
@@ -339,6 +347,7 @@ static bool test_handles_samr(struct torture_context *torture)
{
NTSTATUS status;
struct dcerpc_pipe *p1, *p2;
+ struct dcerpc_binding_handle *b1, *b2;
struct policy_handle handle;
struct policy_handle handle2;
struct samr_Connect r;
@@ -349,30 +358,32 @@ static bool test_handles_samr(struct torture_context *torture)
status = torture_rpc_connection(torture, &p1, &ndr_table_samr);
torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, status, "opening samr pipe1");
+ b1 = p1->binding_handle;
status = torture_rpc_connection(torture, &p2, &ndr_table_samr);
torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, status, "opening samr pipe1");
+ b2 = p2->binding_handle;
r.in.system_name = 0;
r.in.access_mask = SEC_FLAG_MAXIMUM_ALLOWED;
r.out.connect_handle = &handle;
- status = dcerpc_samr_Connect(p1, mem_ctx, &r);
+ status = dcerpc_samr_Connect_r(b1, mem_ctx, &r);
torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, status, "opening policy handle on p1");
c.in.handle = &handle;
c.out.handle = &handle2;
- status = dcerpc_samr_Close(p2, mem_ctx, &c);
+ status = dcerpc_samr_Close_r(b2, mem_ctx, &c);
torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_NET_WRITE_FAULT,
"closing policy handle on p2");
torture_assert_int_equal(torture, p2->last_fault_code, DCERPC_FAULT_CONTEXT_MISMATCH,
"closing policy handle on p2");
- status = dcerpc_samr_Close(p1, mem_ctx, &c);
+ status = dcerpc_samr_Close_r(b1, mem_ctx, &c);
torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, status, "closing policy handle on p1");
- status = dcerpc_samr_Close(p1, mem_ctx, &c);
+ status = dcerpc_samr_Close_r(b1, mem_ctx, &c);
torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_NET_WRITE_FAULT,
"closing policy handle on p1 again");
torture_assert_int_equal(torture, p1->last_fault_code, DCERPC_FAULT_CONTEXT_MISMATCH,
@@ -387,6 +398,7 @@ static bool test_handles_mixed_shared(struct torture_context *torture)
{
NTSTATUS status;
struct dcerpc_pipe *p1, *p2, *p3, *p4, *p5, *p6;
+ struct dcerpc_binding_handle *b1, *b2;
struct policy_handle handle;
struct policy_handle handle2;
struct samr_Connect r;
@@ -401,6 +413,7 @@ static bool test_handles_mixed_shared(struct torture_context *torture)
torture_comment(torture, "connect samr pipe1\n");
status = torture_rpc_connection(torture, &p1, &ndr_table_samr);
torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, status, "opening samr pipe1");
+ b1 = p1->binding_handle;
transport = p1->conn->transport.transport;
assoc_group_id = p1->assoc_group_id;
@@ -412,6 +425,7 @@ static bool test_handles_mixed_shared(struct torture_context *torture)
transport,
assoc_group_id);
torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, status, "opening lsa pipe2");
+ b2 = p2->binding_handle;
torture_comment(torture, "got assoc_group_id[0x%08X] for p2\n",
p2->assoc_group_id);
@@ -420,7 +434,7 @@ static bool test_handles_mixed_shared(struct torture_context *torture)
r.out.connect_handle = &handle;
torture_comment(torture, "samr_Connect to open a policy handle on samr p1\n");
- status = dcerpc_samr_Connect(p1, mem_ctx, &r);
+ status = dcerpc_samr_Connect_r(b1, mem_ctx, &r);
torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, status, "opening policy handle on p1");
lc.in.handle = &handle;
@@ -429,14 +443,14 @@ static bool test_handles_mixed_shared(struct torture_context *torture)
sc.out.handle = &handle2;
torture_comment(torture, "use policy handle on lsa p2 - should fail\n");
- status = dcerpc_lsa_Close(p2, mem_ctx, &lc);
+ status = dcerpc_lsa_Close_r(b2, mem_ctx, &lc);
torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_NET_WRITE_FAULT,
"closing handle on lsa p2");
torture_assert_int_equal(torture, p2->last_fault_code, DCERPC_FAULT_CONTEXT_MISMATCH,
"closing handle on lsa p2");
torture_comment(torture, "closing policy handle on samr p1\n");
- status = dcerpc_samr_Close(p1, mem_ctx, &sc);
+ status = dcerpc_samr_Close_r(b1, mem_ctx, &sc);
torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, status, "closing policy handle on p1");
talloc_free(p1);
@@ -519,6 +533,7 @@ static bool test_handles_drsuapi(struct torture_context *torture)
{
NTSTATUS status;
struct dcerpc_pipe *p1, *p2;
+ struct dcerpc_binding_handle *b1, *b2;
struct policy_handle handle;
struct policy_handle handle2;
struct GUID bind_guid;
@@ -530,9 +545,11 @@ static bool test_handles_drsuapi(struct torture_context *torture)
status = torture_rpc_connection(torture, &p1, &ndr_table_drsuapi);
torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, status, "opening drsuapi pipe1");
+ b1 = p1->binding_handle;
status = torture_rpc_connection(torture, &p2, &ndr_table_drsuapi);
torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, status, "opening drsuapi pipe1");
+ b2 = p2->binding_handle;
GUID_from_string(DRSUAPI_DS_BIND_GUID, &bind_guid);
@@ -540,7 +557,7 @@ static bool test_handles_drsuapi(struct torture_context *torture)
r.in.bind_info = NULL;
r.out.bind_handle = &handle;
- status = dcerpc_drsuapi_DsBind(p1, mem_ctx, &r);
+ status = dcerpc_drsuapi_DsBind_r(b1, mem_ctx, &r);
if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) {
torture_comment(torture, "drsuapi_DsBind not supported - skipping\n");
talloc_free(mem_ctx);
@@ -550,16 +567,16 @@ static bool test_handles_drsuapi(struct torture_context *torture)
c.in.bind_handle = &handle;
c.out.bind_handle = &handle2;
- status = dcerpc_drsuapi_DsUnbind(p2, mem_ctx, &c);
+ status = dcerpc_drsuapi_DsUnbind_r(b2, mem_ctx, &c);
torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_NET_WRITE_FAULT,
"closing policy handle on p2");
torture_assert_int_equal(torture, p2->last_fault_code, DCERPC_FAULT_CONTEXT_MISMATCH,
"closing policy handle on p2");
- status = dcerpc_drsuapi_DsUnbind(p1, mem_ctx, &c);
+ status = dcerpc_drsuapi_DsUnbind_r(b1, mem_ctx, &c);
torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, status, "closing policy handle on p1");
- status = dcerpc_drsuapi_DsUnbind(p1, mem_ctx, &c);
+ status = dcerpc_drsuapi_DsUnbind_r(b1, mem_ctx, &c);
torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_NET_WRITE_FAULT,
"closing policy handle on p1 again");
torture_assert_int_equal(torture, p1->last_fault_code, DCERPC_FAULT_CONTEXT_MISMATCH,
generated by cgit (git 2.34.1) at 2024-12-13 02:52:58 +0000