diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/linked_attributes.c | 7 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/linked_attributes.c b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/linked_attributes.c index 324faa2c2a..393f00fdb6 100644 --- a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/linked_attributes.c +++ b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/linked_attributes.c @@ -975,6 +975,13 @@ static int la_do_op_request(struct ldb_module *module, struct la_context *ac, st ret_el->values[0] = data_blob_string_const(ldb_dn_get_extended_linearized(new_msg, ac->del_dn, 1)); } + /* a backlink should never be single valued. Unfortunately the + exchange schema has a attribute + msExchBridgeheadedLocalConnectorsDNBL which is single + valued and a backlink. We need to cope with that by + ignoring the single value flag */ + ret_el->flags |= LDB_FLAG_INTERNAL_DISABLE_SINGLE_VALUE_CHECK; + #if 0 ldb_debug(ldb, LDB_DEBUG_WARNING, "link on %s %s: %s %s\n", |