summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/docs/docbook/projdoc/Speed.sgml
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/docbook/projdoc/Speed.sgml')
-rw-r--r--docs/docbook/projdoc/Speed.sgml211
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 211 deletions
diff --git a/docs/docbook/projdoc/Speed.sgml b/docs/docbook/projdoc/Speed.sgml
deleted file mode 100644
index 2509883916..0000000000
--- a/docs/docbook/projdoc/Speed.sgml
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,211 +0,0 @@
-<chapter id="speed">
-
-<chapterinfo>
- <author>
- <firstname>Paul</firstname><surname>Cochrane</surname>
- <affiliation>
- <orgname>Dundee Limb Fitting Centre</orgname>
- <address><email>paulc@dth.scot.nhs.uk</email></address>
- </affiliation>
- </author>
- &author.jelmer;
-</chapterinfo>
-
-<title>Samba performance issues</title>
-
-<sect1>
-<title>Comparisons</title>
-
-<para>
-The Samba server uses TCP to talk to the client. Thus if you are
-trying to see if it performs well you should really compare it to
-programs that use the same protocol. The most readily available
-programs for file transfer that use TCP are ftp or another TCP based
-SMB server.
-</para>
-
-<para>
-If you want to test against something like a NT or WfWg server then
-you will have to disable all but TCP on either the client or
-server. Otherwise you may well be using a totally different protocol
-(such as Netbeui) and comparisons may not be valid.
-</para>
-
-<para>
-Generally you should find that Samba performs similarly to ftp at raw
-transfer speed. It should perform quite a bit faster than NFS,
-although this very much depends on your system.
-</para>
-
-<para>
-Several people have done comparisons between Samba and Novell, NFS or
-WinNT. In some cases Samba performed the best, in others the worst. I
-suspect the biggest factor is not Samba vs some other system but the
-hardware and drivers used on the various systems. Given similar
-hardware Samba should certainly be competitive in speed with other
-systems.
-</para>
-
-</sect1>
-
-<sect1>
-<title>Socket options</title>
-
-<para>
-There are a number of socket options that can greatly affect the
-performance of a TCP based server like Samba.
-</para>
-
-<para>
-The socket options that Samba uses are settable both on the command
-line with the -O option, or in the smb.conf file.
-</para>
-
-<para>
-The <command>socket options</command> section of the &smb.conf; manual page describes how
-to set these and gives recommendations.
-</para>
-
-<para>
-Getting the socket options right can make a big difference to your
-performance, but getting them wrong can degrade it by just as
-much. The correct settings are very dependent on your local network.
-</para>
-
-<para>
-The socket option TCP_NODELAY is the one that seems to make the
-biggest single difference for most networks. Many people report that
-adding <command>socket options = TCP_NODELAY</command> doubles the read
-performance of a Samba drive. The best explanation I have seen for this is
-that the Microsoft TCP/IP stack is slow in sending tcp ACKs.
-</para>
-
-</sect1>
-
-<sect1>
-<title>Read size</title>
-
-<para>
-The option <command>read size</command> affects the overlap of disk
-reads/writes with network reads/writes. If the amount of data being
-transferred in several of the SMB commands (currently SMBwrite, SMBwriteX and
-SMBreadbraw) is larger than this value then the server begins writing
-the data before it has received the whole packet from the network, or
-in the case of SMBreadbraw, it begins writing to the network before
-all the data has been read from disk.
-</para>
-
-<para>
-This overlapping works best when the speeds of disk and network access
-are similar, having very little effect when the speed of one is much
-greater than the other.
-</para>
-
-<para>
-The default value is 16384, but very little experimentation has been
-done yet to determine the optimal value, and it is likely that the best
-value will vary greatly between systems anyway. A value over 65536 is
-pointless and will cause you to allocate memory unnecessarily.
-</para>
-
-</sect1>
-
-<sect1>
-<title>Max xmit</title>
-
-<para>
-At startup the client and server negotiate a <command>maximum transmit</command> size,
-which limits the size of nearly all SMB commands. You can set the
-maximum size that Samba will negotiate using the <command>max xmit = </command> option
-in &smb.conf;. Note that this is the maximum size of SMB requests that
-Samba will accept, but not the maximum size that the *client* will accept.
-The client maximum receive size is sent to Samba by the client and Samba
-honours this limit.
-</para>
-
-<para>
-It defaults to 65536 bytes (the maximum), but it is possible that some
-clients may perform better with a smaller transmit unit. Trying values
-of less than 2048 is likely to cause severe problems.
-</para>
-
-<para>
-In most cases the default is the best option.
-</para>
-
-</sect1>
-
-<sect1>
-<title>Log level</title>
-
-<para>
-If you set the log level (also known as <command>debug level</command>) higher than 2
-then you may suffer a large drop in performance. This is because the
-server flushes the log file after each operation, which can be very
-expensive.
-</para>
-</sect1>
-
-<sect1>
-<title>Read raw</title>
-
-<para>
-The <command>read raw</command> operation is designed to be an optimised, low-latency
-file read operation. A server may choose to not support it,
-however. and Samba makes support for <command>read raw</command> optional, with it
-being enabled by default.
-</para>
-
-<para>
-In some cases clients don't handle <command>read raw</command> very well and actually
-get lower performance using it than they get using the conventional
-read operations.
-</para>
-
-<para>
-So you might like to try <command>read raw = no</command> and see what happens on your
-network. It might lower, raise or not affect your performance. Only
-testing can really tell.
-</para>
-
-</sect1>
-
-<sect1>
-<title>Write raw</title>
-
-<para>
-The <command>write raw</command> operation is designed to be an optimised, low-latency
-file write operation. A server may choose to not support it,
-however. and Samba makes support for <command>write raw</command> optional, with it
-being enabled by default.
-</para>
-
-<para>
-Some machines may find <command>write raw</command> slower than normal write, in which
-case you may wish to change this option.
-</para>
-
-</sect1>
-
-<sect1>
-<title>Slow Logins</title>
-
-<para>
-Slow logins are almost always due to the password checking time. Using
-the lowest practical <command>password level</command> will improve things.
-</para>
-
-</sect1>
-
-<sect1>
-<title>Client tuning</title>
-
-<para>
-Often a speed problem can be traced to the client. The client (for
-example Windows for Workgroups) can often be tuned for better TCP
-performance. Check the sections on the various clients in
-<link linkend="Other-Clients">Samba and Other Clients</link>.
-</para>
-
-</sect1>
-</chapter>