5 files changed, 94 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/docs/docbook/projdoc/NetworkBrowsing.xml b/docs/docbook/projdoc/NetworkBrowsing.xml
index 70e4210443..971963579b 100644
--- a/docs/docbook/projdoc/NetworkBrowsing.xml
+++ b/docs/docbook/projdoc/NetworkBrowsing.xml
@@ -1506,5 +1506,19 @@ This may take a long time on some networks (months).
 </para>
 
 </sect2>
+
+<sect1>
+<title>My client reports "This server is not configured to list shared resources"</title>
+
+<para>
+Your guest account is probably invalid for some reason. Samba uses the
+guest account for browsing in smbd.  Check that your guest account is
+valid.
+</para>
+
+<para>See also <parameter>guest account</parameter> in the &smb.conf; man page.</para>
+
+</sect2>
+
 </sect1>
 </chapter>
diff --git a/docs/docbook/projdoc/Samba-PDC-HOWTO.xml b/docs/docbook/projdoc/Samba-PDC-HOWTO.xml
index 05d0131f94..af05b32e4a 100644
--- a/docs/docbook/projdoc/Samba-PDC-HOWTO.xml
+++ b/docs/docbook/projdoc/Samba-PDC-HOWTO.xml
@@ -903,5 +903,13 @@ Enable the user accounts with <userinput>smbpasswd -e <replaceable>username</rep
 </para>
 
 </sect2>
+
+<sect2>
+	<title>Until a few minutes after samba has started, clients get the error "Domain Controller Unavailable"</title>
+	<para>
+		A domain controller has to announce on the network who it is. This usually takes a while.
+	</para>
+</sect2>
+
 </sect1>
 </chapter>
diff --git a/docs/docbook/projdoc/UNIX_INSTALL.xml b/docs/docbook/projdoc/UNIX_INSTALL.xml
index a169bea558..f305686915 100644
--- a/docs/docbook/projdoc/UNIX_INSTALL.xml
+++ b/docs/docbook/projdoc/UNIX_INSTALL.xml
@@ -212,15 +212,19 @@ The following questions and issues get raised on the samba mailing list over and
 <title>Why are so many smbd processes eating memory?</title>
 
 <para>
+<quote>
 Site that is running Samba on an AIX box. They are sharing out about 2 terabytes using samba.
 Samba was installed using smitty and the binaries. We seem to be experiencing a memory problem
 with this box.  When I do a <command>svmon -Pu</command> the monitoring program shows that &smbd; has several
 processes of smbd running:
+</quote>
 </para>
 
 <para>
+	<quote>
 Is samba suppose to start this many different smbd processes?  Or does it run as one smbd process?  Also
 is it normal for it to be taking up this much memory?
+</quote>
 </para>
 
 <para>
@@ -256,7 +260,7 @@ Inuse * 4096 = amount of memory being used by this process
 
 
 <para>
-<emphasis>ANSWER:</emphasis> Samba consists on three core programs:
+Samba consists on three core programs:
 &nmbd;, &smbd;, &winbindd;. &nmbd; is the name server message daemon,
 &smbd; is the server message daemon, &winbindd; is the daemon that
 handles communication with Domain Controllers.
@@ -279,6 +283,12 @@ run in "split mode" (in which case there will be two instances).
 </para>
 
 </sect2>
+
+	<sect2>
+	<title>I'm getting "open_oplock_ipc: Failed to get local UDP socket for address 100007f. Error was Cannot assign requested" in the logs</title>
+    <para>Your loopback device isn't working correctly. Make sure it's running.  </para>
+	</sect2>
+
 </sect1>
 
 </chapter>
diff --git a/docs/docbook/projdoc/printer_driver2.xml b/docs/docbook/projdoc/printer_driver2.xml
index 1a5f514a33..f730b238bd 100644
--- a/docs/docbook/projdoc/printer_driver2.xml
+++ b/docs/docbook/projdoc/printer_driver2.xml
@@ -335,7 +335,6 @@ as shown above:
 </para>
 
 <para><screen>
-
  transmeta: # testparm -v | egrep "(lp|print|spool|driver|ports|\[)"
  
  Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf.simpleprinting
diff --git a/docs/docbook/projdoc/securing-samba.xml b/docs/docbook/projdoc/securing-samba.xml
index 1004260394..b137a05ec9 100644
--- a/docs/docbook/projdoc/securing-samba.xml
+++ b/docs/docbook/projdoc/securing-samba.xml
@@ -304,5 +304,66 @@ out to be a security problem request are totally convinced that the problem is w
 
 	</sect2>
 
+	<sect2>
+	<title>Why can users access home directories of other users?</title>
+
+	<para>
+	<quote>
+	We are unable to keep individual users from mapping to any other user's
+	home directory once they have supplied a valid password! They only need
+	to enter their own password. I have not found *any* method that I can
+	use to configure samba to enforce that only a user may map their own
+	home directory.
+	</quote>
+	</para>
+
+	<para><quote>
+	User xyzzy can map his home directory. Once mapped user xyzzy can also map
+	*anyone* elses home directory!
+	</quote></para>
+
+	<para>
+	This is not a security flaw, it is by design. Samba allows
+	users to have *exactly* the same access to the UNIX filesystem
+	as they would if they were logged onto the UNIX box, except
+	that it only allows such views onto the file system as are
+	allowed by the defined shares.
+	</para>
+
+	<para>
+	This means that if your UNIX home directories are set up
+	such that one user can happily cd into another users
+	directory and do an ls, the UNIX security solution is to
+	change the UNIX file permissions on the users home directories
+	such that the cd and ls would be denied.
+	</para>
+
+	<para>
+	Samba tries very hard not to second guess the UNIX administrators
+	security policies, and trusts the UNIX admin to set
+	the policies and permissions he or she desires.
+	</para>
+
+	<para>
+	Samba does allow the setup you require when you have set the
+	<parameter>only user = yes</parameter> option on the share, is that you have not set the
+	valid users list for the share.
+	</para>
+
+	<para>
+	Note that only user works in conjunction with the users= list,
+	so to get the behavior you require, add the line :
+	<programlisting>
+	users = %S
+	</programlisting>
+	this is equivalent to:
+	<programlisting>
+	valid users = %S
+	</programlisting>
+	to the definition of the <parameter>[homes]</parameter> share, as recommended in
+	the &smb.conf; man page.
+	</para>
+	</sect2>
+
 </sect1>
 </chapter>