summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/docs/textdocs/Speed2.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/textdocs/Speed2.txt')
-rw-r--r--docs/textdocs/Speed2.txt57
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 57 deletions
diff --git a/docs/textdocs/Speed2.txt b/docs/textdocs/Speed2.txt
deleted file mode 100644
index a8c3e7381f..0000000000
--- a/docs/textdocs/Speed2.txt
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,57 +0,0 @@
-Contributor: Paul Cochrane <paulc@dth.scot.nhs.uk>
-Organization: Dundee Limb Fitting Centre
-Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1998
-Subject: Samba SPEED.TXT comment
-=============================================================================
-
-This might be relevant to Client Tuning. I have been trying various methods
-of getting win95 to talk to Samba quicker. The results I have come up with
-are:
-
-1. Install the W2setup.exe file from www.microsoft.com. This is an
-update for the winsock stack and utilities which improve performance.
-
-2. Configure the win95 TCPIP registry settings to give better
-perfomance. I use a program called MTUSPEED.exe which I got off the
-net. There are various other utilities of this type freely available.
-The setting which give the best performance for me are:
-
-(a) MaxMTU Remove
-(b) RWIN Remove
-(c) MTUAutoDiscover Disable
-(d) MTUBlackHoleDetect Disable
-(e) Time To Live Enabled
-(f) Time To Live - HOPS 32
-(g) NDI Cache Size 0
-
-3. I tried virtually all of the items mentioned in the document and
-the only one which made a difference to me was the socket options. It
-turned out I was better off without any!!!!!
-
-In terms of overall speed of transfer, between various win95 clients
-and a DX2-66 20MB server with a crappy NE2000 compatible and old IDE
-drive (Kernel 2.0.30). The transfer rate was reasonable for 10 baseT.
-
-The figures are: Put Get
-P166 client 3Com card: 420-440kB/s 500-520kB/s
-P100 client 3Com card: 390-410kB/s 490-510kB/s
-DX4-75 client NE2000: 370-380kB/s 330-350kB/s
-
-I based these test on transfer two files a 4.5MB text file and a 15MB
-textfile. The results arn't bad considering the hardware Samba is
-running on. It's a crap machine!!!!
-
-The updates mentioned in 1 and 2 brought up the transfer rates from
-just over 100kB/s in some clients.
-
-A new client is a P333 connected via a 100MB/s card and hub. The
-transfer rates from this were good: 450-500kB/s on put and 600+kB/s
-on get.
-
-Looking at standard FTP throughput, Samba is a bit slower (100kB/s
-upwards). I suppose there is more going on in the samba protocol, but
-if it could get up to the rate of FTP the perfomance would be quite
-staggering.
-
-Paul Cochrane
-