diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'packaging/Debian/debian-stable/README.debian')
-rw-r--r-- | packaging/Debian/debian-stable/README.debian | 183 |
1 files changed, 183 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/packaging/Debian/debian-stable/README.debian b/packaging/Debian/debian-stable/README.debian new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..5ea80e32ae --- /dev/null +++ b/packaging/Debian/debian-stable/README.debian @@ -0,0 +1,183 @@ +0. Samba Team Notes: +This package is targeted at the current stable release of debian distribution +(woody) running on a 2.4.x kernel. +This package has been made by Simo Sorce on behalf of the Samba Team. +Do not use Debian BTS to report bugs, it's not a debian project package. +Thanks to Eloy Paris and Steve "Vorlon" Langasek for the work they've done +and continue to do on debian unstable packages. That made me possible to +build up debian packages for the Team. + + +ATTENTION: This package works correctly only with recent 2.4.x kernels due to +deep optimizations that samba uses when compiled on such kernels. + + +Original README.Debian foolows. +----------------------------------------------------------------------------- + +Samba for Debian +---------------- + +This package was built by Eloy Paris <peloy@debian.org> and Steve Langasek +<vorlon@debian.org>, current maintainers of the Samba packages for Debian, +based on previous work from Bruce Perens <Bruce@Pixar.com>, Andrew +Howell <andrew@it.com.au>, Klee Dienes <klee@debian.org> and Michael +Meskes <meskes@topsystem.de>, all previous maintainers of the packages +samba and sambades (merged together for longer than we can remember.) + +Contents of this README file: + +1. Notes +2. Upgrading from Samba 2.2 +3. Packages Generated from the Samba Sources +4. Support for NT Domains +5. Reporting bugs + + +1. Notes +-------- + +- As of Samba 2.0.6-1, the Debian version of Samba is compiled with + Pluggable Authentication Modules (PAM) support. PAM support was + discontinued during the libc5 -> libc6 migration process and I never + brought it back until 2.0.6-1. + +- The smbfs package does not support the 2.0.x Linux kernels anymore. + This has been the case since the very first packages of the CVS sources + that eventually became Samba 2.2. To use the smbfs package you need to + run a 2.2.x kernel or later. + +- Starting with the Debian packages for Samba 2.2, the Samba log files (for + nmbd and smbd) have been moved to a new location: /var/log/samba/. The + files also have new names: log.nmbd and log.smbd. The old files + (/var/log/{nmb,smb} were moved to the new location. + + +2. Upgrading from Samba 2.2 +--------------------------- + +Samba 3.0 provides greatly improved support for modern Windows systems, +including support for Unicode and LDAP. In the process, Samba 3.0 +necessarily also breaks backward compatiblity with past releases. These +issues are documented herein; if you are aware of other problems related +to upgrading from Samba 2.2, please let us know at +<samba@packages.debian.org>. + +Samba and LDAP +-------------- +Starting with Samba 2.999+3.0cvs20020723-1 we are building Samba with +LDAP support. However, the LDAP schema for Samba 3.0 differs +substantially from the schema used by many sites with Samba 2.2 (not +enabled in the Debian packages). If upgrading from an LDAP-enabled 2.2, +you will need to run the convertSambaAccount script found in +/usr/share/doc/samba-doc/examples/LDAP. A copy of the schema itself can +also be found at /usr/share/doc/samba-doc/examples/LDAP/samba.schema. + +Character Sets +-------------- +Samba 3.0 introduces support for negotiating Unicode (UCS-2LE) with +Windows clients. Owing to the close similarity between Windows and Unix +NLS charsets, in the past, many users were able to pass filenames +containing non-ASCII characters between clients and servers without +configuring Samba to know what character set was in use. Now, Samba +must be able to convert Unix filenames to Unicode before sending to the +client, so Samba must know what character set the filenames are being +converted from. If you will be sharing files with non-ASCII names, and +the filenames are not encoded with UTF-8, you will need to tell Samba +which character set to use with the 'unix charset' option. + +If you had previously specified 'character set' and 'client code page' +options under 2.2, these settings should be automatically converted for +you. + + +3. Packages Generated from the Samba Sources +-------------------------------------------- + +Currently, the Samba sources produce the following binary packages: + +samba: A LanManager like file and printer server for Unix. +samba-common: Samba common files used by both the server and the client. +smbclient: A LanManager like simple client for Unix. +swat: Samba Web Administration Tool +samba-doc: Samba documentation. +smbfs: Mount and umount commands for the smbfs (works with 2.2.x and + above kernels, not with 2.0.x kernels.) +libpam-smbpass: pluggable authentication module for SMB password + database. +libsmbclient: Shared library that allows applications to talk to SMB servers. +libsmbclient-dev: libsmbclient shared libraries. +winbind: Service to resolve user and group information from a Windows NT + server. +python2.2-samba: Python bindings that allow access to various aspects of + Samba. + +Please note that the package smbwrapper (a shared library that provides +SMB client services that existed between Samba 2.0.0-1 and Samba-2.0.5a-4 +does not exist any more. The reason is that starting with Samba 2.0.6-1, that +code does not even compile, and the upstream author (Andrew Tridgell) +recommended to disable the compilation of smbwrapper until some issues +with glibc2.1 get cleared out (the problem is with glibc, not with Samba +itself). + + +4. Support for NT Domains +------------------------- + +Samba 2.2 includes preliminary support for NT domains. A Samba server +can now be part of a Windows NT domain whose Primary Domain Controller +is a Windows NT server. This feature is supposed to be stable although I +haven't tried it myself. Read the documentation in the samba-doc package +for help on how to do this (hint: "security = domain" in the smb.conf +file). + +Samba 2.2 has also experimental support for Primary Domain +Controller. This means that a Samba server can act now as a PDC. There +are no special flags needed to compile Samba with NT domain PDC +support. Please read the NTDOM PDC FAQ at www.samba.org (Documentation +section). + +Please note that NT domain PDC support is far from complete and is still +experimental. + + +5. Reporting Bugs +----------------- + +**** NOTE: This package is distributed by the Samba Team based on Debian + packages, please submit bus to https://bugzilla.samba.org instead **** + +If you believe you have found a bug please make sure the possible bug +also exists in the latest version of Samba that is available for the +unstable Debian distribution. If you are running Debian stable this +means that you will probably have to build your own packages. And if the +problem does not exist in the latest version of Samba we have packaged it +means that you will have to run the version of Samba you built yourself +since it is not easy to upload new packages to the stable distribution, +unless they fix critical security problems. + +If you can reproduce the problem in the latest version of Samba then +it is likely to be a real bug. Your best shot is to search the Samba +mailing lists to see if it is something that has already been reported +and fixed - if it is a simple fix we can add the patch to our packages +without waiting for a new Samba release. + +If you decide that your problem deserves to be submitted to the Debian +Bug Tracking System (BTS) we expect you to be responsive if we request +more information. If we request more information and do not receive +any in a reasonable time frame expect to see your bug closed without +explanation - we can't fix bugs we can't reproduce, and most of the +time we need more information to be able to reproduce them. + +When submitting a bug to the Debian BTS please include the version of +the Debian package you are using as well as the Debian distribution you +are using. Think _twice_ about the severity you assign to the bug: we +are _very_ sensitive about bug severities; the fact that it doesn't +work for you doesn't mean that the severity must be such that it holds +a major Debian release. In fact, that it doesn't work for you it +doesn't mean that it doesn't work for others. So again: think _twice_. + + +Eloy A. Paris <peloy@debian.org> +Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> + |