summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules')
-rw-r--r--source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/config.mk12
-rw-r--r--source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/password_hash.c711
2 files changed, 723 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/config.mk b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/config.mk
index 3d20bff809..f9c267e2db 100644
--- a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/config.mk
+++ b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/config.mk
@@ -50,3 +50,15 @@ OBJ_FILES = \
# End MODULE libldb_rootdse
################################################
+################################################
+# Start MODULE libldb_password_hash
+[MODULE::libldb_password_hash]
+SUBSYSTEM = LIBLDB
+OBJ_FILES = \
+ password_hash.o
+REQUIRED_SUBSYSTEMS = \
+ HEIMDAL_HDB HEIMDAL_KRB5
+#
+# End MODULE libldb_rootdse
+################################################
+
diff --git a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/password_hash.c b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/password_hash.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..bb42a0e634
--- /dev/null
+++ b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/password_hash.c
@@ -0,0 +1,711 @@
+/*
+ ldb database module
+
+ Copyright (C) Simo Sorce 2004
+ Copyright (C) Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> 2005
+ Copyright (C) Andrew Tridgell 2004
+
+ This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+ the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
+ (at your option) any later version.
+
+ This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+ GNU General Public License for more details.
+
+ You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+ along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
+ Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
+*/
+
+/*
+ * Name: ldb
+ *
+ * Component: ldb password_hash module
+ *
+ * Description: correctly update hash values based on changes to unicodePwd and friends
+ *
+ * Author: Andrew Bartlett
+ */
+
+#include "includes.h"
+#include "libcli/ldap/ldap.h"
+#include "ldb/include/ldb_errors.h"
+#include "ldb/include/ldb_private.h"
+#include "librpc/gen_ndr/ndr_misc.h"
+#include "librpc/gen_ndr/ndr_samr.h"
+#include "system/kerberos.h"
+#include "auth/kerberos/kerberos.h"
+#include "system/time.h"
+#include "dsdb/samdb/samdb.h"
+#include "ads.h"
+#include "hdb.h"
+
+/* If we have decided there is reason to work on this request, then
+ * setup all the password hash types correctly.
+ *
+ * If the administrator doesn't want the unicodePwd stored (set in the
+ * domain and per-account policies) then we must strip that out before
+ * we do the first operation.
+ *
+ * Once this is done (which could update anything at all), we
+ * calculate the password hashes.
+ *
+ * This function must not only update the ntPwdHash, lmPwdHash and
+ * krb5Key fields, it must also atomicly increment the
+ * msDS-KeyVersionNumber. We should be in a transaction, so all this
+ * should be quite safe...
+ *
+ * Finally, if the administrator has requested that a password history
+ * be maintained, then this should also be written out.
+ *
+ */
+
+
+static int password_hash_handle(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request *req,
+ const struct ldb_message *msg)
+{
+ int ret, old_ret = -1;
+ uint_t pwdProperties, pwdHistoryLength;
+ uint_t userAccountControl;
+ const char *dnsDomain, *realm;
+ const char *unicodePwd;
+ struct samr_Password *lmPwdHistory, *ntPwdHistory;
+ struct samr_Password *lmPwdHash, *ntPwdHash;
+ struct samr_Password *lmOldHash = NULL, *ntOldHash = NULL;
+ struct samr_Password *new_lmPwdHistory, *new_ntPwdHistory;
+ struct samr_Password local_lmNewHash, local_ntNewHash;
+ int lmPwdHistory_len, ntPwdHistory_len;
+ uint_t kvno;
+ struct dom_sid *domain_sid;
+ time_t now = time(NULL);
+ NTTIME now_nt;
+ int i;
+ krb5_error_code krb5_ret;
+
+ struct smb_krb5_context *smb_krb5_context;
+
+ struct ldb_message_element *attribute;
+ struct ldb_dn *dn = msg->dn;
+ struct ldb_message *msg2;
+
+ struct ldb_request search_request;
+ struct ldb_request modify_request;
+ struct ldb_request modified_orig_request;
+ struct ldb_result *res, *dom_res, *old_res;
+
+ struct ldb_message_element *objectclasses;
+ struct ldb_val computer_val;
+ struct ldb_val person_val;
+ BOOL is_computer;
+
+ struct ldb_message *modify_msg;
+
+ const char *domain_expression;
+ const char *old_user_attrs[] = { "lmPwdHash", "ntPwdHash", NULL };
+ const char *user_attrs[] = { "userAccountControl", "lmPwdHistory",
+ "ntPwdHistory",
+ "ntPwdHash",
+ "objectSid", "msDS-KeyVersionNumber",
+ "objectClass", "userPrincipalName",
+ "samAccountName",
+ NULL };
+ const char * const domain_attrs[] = { "pwdProperties", "pwdHistoryLength",
+ "dnsDomain", NULL };
+
+ TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx;
+
+ /* Do the original action */
+
+ /* If no part of this touches the unicodePwd, then we don't
+ * need to make any changes. For password changes/set there should
+ * be a 'delete' or a 'modify' on this attribute. */
+ if ((attribute = ldb_msg_find_element(msg, "unicodePwd")) == NULL ) {
+ return ldb_next_request(module, req);
+ }
+
+ mem_ctx = talloc_new(module);
+ if (!mem_ctx) {
+ return LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR;
+ }
+
+ if (req->operation == LDB_REQ_MODIFY) {
+ /* Look up the old ntPwdHash and lmPwdHash values, so
+ * we can later place these into the password
+ * history */
+
+ search_request.operation = LDB_REQ_SEARCH;
+ search_request.op.search.base = dn;
+ search_request.op.search.scope = LDB_SCOPE_BASE;
+ search_request.op.search.tree = ldb_parse_tree(module->ldb, NULL);
+ search_request.op.search.attrs = old_user_attrs;
+
+ old_ret = ldb_next_request(module, &search_request);
+ }
+
+ /* we can't change things untill we copy it */
+ msg2 = ldb_msg_copy_shallow(mem_ctx, msg);
+
+ /* look again, this time at the copied attribute */
+ if (!msg2 || (attribute = ldb_msg_find_element(msg2, "unicodePwd")) == NULL ) {
+ /* Gah? where did it go? Oh well... */
+ return LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR;
+ }
+
+ /* Wipe out the unicodePwd attribute set, we will handle it in
+ * the second modify. We might not want it written to disk */
+
+ if (req->operation == LDB_REQ_ADD) {
+ if (attribute->num_values != 1) {
+ ldb_set_errstring(module,
+ talloc_asprintf(mem_ctx, "unicodePwd_handle: "
+ "attempted set of multiple unicodePwd attributes on %s rejected",
+ ldb_dn_linearize(mem_ctx, dn)));
+ return LDB_ERR_CONSTRAINT_VIOLAION;
+ }
+
+ unicodePwd = (const char *)attribute->values[0].data;
+ ldb_msg_remove_attr(msg2, "unicodePwd");
+ } else if (((attribute->flags & LDB_FLAG_MOD_MASK) == LDB_FLAG_MOD_ADD)
+ || ((attribute->flags & LDB_FLAG_MOD_MASK) == LDB_FLAG_MOD_REPLACE)) {
+ if (attribute->num_values != 1) {
+ return LDB_ERR_CONSTRAINT_VIOLAION;
+ }
+
+ unicodePwd = (const char *)attribute->values[0].data;
+ ldb_msg_remove_attr(msg2, "unicodePwd");
+ } else {
+ unicodePwd = NULL;
+ }
+
+ modified_orig_request = *req;
+ switch (modified_orig_request.operation) {
+ case LDB_REQ_ADD:
+ modified_orig_request.op.add.message = msg2;
+ break;
+ case LDB_REQ_MODIFY:
+ modified_orig_request.op.mod.message = msg2;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ /* Send the (modified) request of the original caller down to the database */
+ ret = ldb_next_request(module, &modified_orig_request);
+ if (ret) {
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ /* While we do the search first (for the old password hashes),
+ * we don't want to override any error that the modify may
+ * have returned. Now check the error */
+ if (req->operation == LDB_REQ_MODIFY) {
+ if (old_ret) {
+ talloc_free(mem_ctx);
+ return old_ret;
+ }
+
+ /* Find out the old passwords details of the user */
+ old_res = search_request.op.search.res;
+
+ if (old_res->count != 1) {
+ ldb_set_errstring(module,
+ talloc_asprintf(mem_ctx, "password_hash_handle: "
+ "(pre) search for %s found %d != 1 objects, for entry we just modified",
+ ldb_dn_linearize(mem_ctx, dn),
+ old_res->count));
+ /* What happend? The above add/modify worked... */
+ talloc_free(mem_ctx);
+ return LDB_ERR_NO_SUCH_OBJECT;
+ }
+
+ lmOldHash = samdb_result_hash(mem_ctx, old_res->msgs[0], "lmPwdHash");
+ ntOldHash = samdb_result_hash(mem_ctx, old_res->msgs[0], "ntPwdHash");
+ }
+
+ /* Start finding out details we need for the second modify.
+ * We do this after the first add/modify because other modules
+ * will have filled in the templates, and we may have had
+ * things like the username (affecting the salt) changed along
+ * with the password. */
+
+ /* Now find out what is on the entry after the above add/modify */
+ search_request.operation = LDB_REQ_SEARCH;
+ search_request.op.search.base = dn;
+ search_request.op.search.scope = LDB_SCOPE_BASE;
+ search_request.op.search.tree = ldb_parse_tree(module->ldb, NULL);
+ search_request.op.search.attrs = user_attrs;
+
+ ret = ldb_next_request(module, &search_request);
+ if (ret) {
+ talloc_free(mem_ctx);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ /* Find out the full details of the user */
+ res = search_request.op.search.res;
+ if (res->count != 1) {
+ ldb_set_errstring(module,
+ talloc_asprintf(mem_ctx, "password_hash_handle: "
+ "search for %s found %d != 1 objects, for entry we just added/modified",
+ ldb_dn_linearize(mem_ctx, dn),
+ res->count));
+ /* What happend? The above add/modify worked... */
+ talloc_free(mem_ctx);
+ return LDB_ERR_NO_SUCH_OBJECT;
+ }
+
+ userAccountControl = samdb_result_uint(res->msgs[0], "userAccountControl", 0);
+ lmPwdHistory_len = samdb_result_hashes(mem_ctx, res->msgs[0],
+ "lmPwdHistory", &lmPwdHistory);
+ ntPwdHistory_len = samdb_result_hashes(mem_ctx, res->msgs[0],
+ "ntPwdHistory", &ntPwdHistory);
+ ntPwdHash = samdb_result_hash(mem_ctx, res->msgs[0], "ntPwdHash");
+ kvno = samdb_result_uint(res->msgs[0], "msDS-KeyVersionNumber", 0);
+
+ domain_sid = samdb_result_sid_prefix(mem_ctx, res->msgs[0], "objectSid");
+
+
+ objectclasses = ldb_msg_find_element(res->msgs[0], "objectClass");
+ person_val = data_blob_string_const("person");
+
+ if (!objectclasses || !ldb_msg_find_val(objectclasses, &person_val)) {
+ /* Not a 'person', so the rest of this doesn't make
+ * sense. How we got a unicodePwd this far I don't
+ * know... */
+ ldb_set_errstring(module,
+ talloc_asprintf(mem_ctx, "password_hash_handle: "
+ "attempted set of unicodePwd on non-'person' object %s rejected",
+ ldb_dn_linearize(mem_ctx, dn)));
+ talloc_free(mem_ctx);
+ return LDB_ERR_CONSTRAINT_VIOLAION;
+ }
+
+ computer_val = data_blob_string_const("computer");
+
+ if (ldb_msg_find_val(objectclasses, &computer_val)) {
+ is_computer = True;
+ } else {
+ is_computer = False;
+ }
+
+ domain_expression = talloc_asprintf(mem_ctx, "(&(objectSid=%s)(objectClass=domain))",
+ ldap_encode_ndr_dom_sid(mem_ctx, domain_sid));
+
+ /* Find the user's domain, then find out the domain password
+ * properties */
+ ret = ldb_search(module->ldb, NULL, LDB_SCOPE_SUBTREE, domain_expression,
+ domain_attrs, &dom_res);
+ if (ret) {
+ talloc_free(mem_ctx);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ if (dom_res->count != 1) {
+ /* What happend? The user we are modifying must be odd... */
+ ldb_set_errstring(module,
+ talloc_asprintf(mem_ctx, "password_hash_handle: "
+ "search for domain %s found %d != 1 objects",
+ dom_sid_string(mem_ctx, domain_sid),
+ dom_res->count));
+ talloc_free(mem_ctx);
+ return LDB_ERR_NO_SUCH_OBJECT;
+ }
+
+ pwdProperties = samdb_result_uint(dom_res->msgs[0], "pwdProperties", 0);
+ pwdHistoryLength = samdb_result_uint(dom_res->msgs[0], "pwdHistoryLength", 0);
+ dnsDomain = ldb_msg_find_string(dom_res->msgs[0], "dnsDomain", NULL);
+ realm = strupper_talloc(mem_ctx, dnsDomain);
+
+ /* Some operations below require kerberos contexts */
+ if (smb_krb5_init_context(mem_ctx, &smb_krb5_context) != 0) {
+ talloc_free(mem_ctx);
+ return LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR;
+ }
+
+ /* Prepare the modifications to set all the hash/key types */
+ modify_msg = ldb_msg_new(req);
+ modify_msg->dn = talloc_reference(modify_msg, dn);
+
+#define CHECK_RET(x) \
+ do { \
+ int check_ret = x; \
+ if (check_ret != LDB_SUCCESS) { \
+ talloc_free(mem_ctx); \
+ return check_ret; \
+ } \
+ } while(0)
+
+ /* Setup krb5Key (we want to either delete an existing value,
+ * or replace with a new one). Both the unicode and NT hash
+ * only branches append keys to this multivalued entry. */
+ CHECK_RET(ldb_msg_add_empty(modify_msg, "krb5Key", LDB_FLAG_MOD_REPLACE));
+ /* Yay, we can compute new password hashes from the unicode
+ * password */
+ if (unicodePwd) {
+ Principal *salt_principal;
+ const char *user_principal_name = ldb_msg_find_string(res->msgs[0], "userPrincipalName", NULL);
+
+ Key *keys;
+ size_t num_keys;
+
+ /* compute the new nt and lm hashes */
+ if (E_deshash(unicodePwd, local_lmNewHash.hash)) {
+ lmPwdHash = &local_lmNewHash;
+ } else {
+ lmPwdHash = NULL;
+ }
+ E_md4hash(unicodePwd, local_ntNewHash.hash);
+ ntPwdHash = &local_ntNewHash;
+ CHECK_RET(ldb_msg_add_empty(modify_msg, "ntPwdHash",
+ LDB_FLAG_MOD_REPLACE));
+ CHECK_RET(samdb_msg_add_hash(module->ldb, req,
+ modify_msg, "ntPwdHash",
+ ntPwdHash));
+ CHECK_RET(ldb_msg_add_empty(modify_msg, "lmPwdHash",
+ LDB_FLAG_MOD_REPLACE));
+ if (lmPwdHash) {
+ CHECK_RET(samdb_msg_add_hash(module->ldb, req,
+ modify_msg, "lmPwdHash",
+ lmPwdHash));
+ }
+
+ /* Many, many thanks to lukeh@padl.com for this
+ * algorithm, described in his Nov 10 2004 mail to
+ * samba-technical@samba.org */
+
+ if (is_computer) {
+ /* Determine a salting principal */
+ char *samAccountName = talloc_strdup(mem_ctx, ldb_msg_find_string(res->msgs[0], "samAccountName", NULL));
+ char *saltbody;
+ if (!samAccountName) {
+ ldb_set_errstring(module,
+ talloc_asprintf(mem_ctx, "password_hash_handle: "
+ "generation of new kerberos keys failed: %s is a computer without a samAccountName",
+ ldb_dn_linearize(mem_ctx, dn)));
+ talloc_free(mem_ctx);
+ return LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR;
+ }
+ if (samAccountName[strlen(samAccountName)-1] == '$') {
+ samAccountName[strlen(samAccountName)-1] = '\0';
+ }
+ saltbody = talloc_asprintf(mem_ctx, "%s.%s", samAccountName, dnsDomain);
+
+ krb5_ret = krb5_make_principal(smb_krb5_context->krb5_context, &salt_principal, realm, "host", saltbody, NULL);
+ } else if (user_principal_name) {
+ char *p;
+ user_principal_name = talloc_strdup(mem_ctx, user_principal_name);
+ if (!user_principal_name) {
+ talloc_free(mem_ctx);
+ return LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR;
+ } else {
+ p = strchr(user_principal_name, '@');
+ if (p) {
+ p[0] = '\0';
+ }
+ krb5_ret = krb5_make_principal(smb_krb5_context->krb5_context, &salt_principal, realm, user_principal_name, NULL);
+ }
+ } else {
+ const char *samAccountName = ldb_msg_find_string(res->msgs[0], "samAccountName", NULL);
+ if (!samAccountName) {
+ ldb_set_errstring(module,
+ talloc_asprintf(mem_ctx, "password_hash_handle: "
+ "generation of new kerberos keys failed: %s has no samAccountName",
+ ldb_dn_linearize(mem_ctx, dn)));
+ talloc_free(mem_ctx);
+ return LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR;
+ }
+ krb5_ret = krb5_make_principal(smb_krb5_context->krb5_context, &salt_principal, realm, samAccountName, NULL);
+ }
+
+
+ if (krb5_ret) {
+ ldb_set_errstring(module,
+ talloc_asprintf(mem_ctx, "password_hash_handle: "
+ "generation of a saltking principal failed: %s",
+ smb_get_krb5_error_message(smb_krb5_context->krb5_context,
+ krb5_ret, mem_ctx)));
+ talloc_free(mem_ctx);
+ return LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR;
+ }
+
+ /* TODO: We may wish to control the encryption types chosen in future */
+ krb5_ret = hdb_generate_key_set_password(smb_krb5_context->krb5_context,
+ salt_principal, unicodePwd, &keys, &num_keys);
+ krb5_free_principal(smb_krb5_context->krb5_context, salt_principal);
+
+ if (krb5_ret) {
+ ldb_set_errstring(module,
+ talloc_asprintf(mem_ctx, "password_hash_handle: "
+ "generation of new kerberos keys failed: %s",
+ smb_get_krb5_error_message(smb_krb5_context->krb5_context,
+ krb5_ret, mem_ctx)));
+ talloc_free(mem_ctx);
+ return LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR;
+ }
+
+ /* Walking
+ */
+ for (i=0; i < num_keys; i++) {
+ unsigned char *buf;
+ size_t buf_size;
+ size_t len;
+ struct ldb_val val;
+
+ if (keys[i].key.keytype == ENCTYPE_ARCFOUR_HMAC) {
+ /* We might end up doing this below:
+ * This ensures we get the unicode
+ * conversion right. This should also
+ * be fixed in the Heimdal libs */
+ continue;
+ }
+ ASN1_MALLOC_ENCODE(Key, buf, buf_size, &keys[i], &len, krb5_ret);
+
+ val.data = talloc_memdup(req, buf, len);
+ val.length = len;
+ free(buf);
+ if (!val.data || krb5_ret) {
+ hdb_free_keys (smb_krb5_context->krb5_context, num_keys, keys);
+ talloc_free(mem_ctx);
+ return LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR;
+ }
+ ret = ldb_msg_add_value(modify_msg, "krb5Key", &val);
+ if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) {
+ hdb_free_keys (smb_krb5_context->krb5_context, num_keys, keys);
+ talloc_free(mem_ctx);
+ return ret;
+ }
+ }
+
+ hdb_free_keys (smb_krb5_context->krb5_context, num_keys, keys);
+ }
+
+ /* Possibly kill off the cleartext or store it */
+ CHECK_RET(ldb_msg_add_empty(modify_msg, "unicodePwd", LDB_FLAG_MOD_REPLACE));
+
+ if (unicodePwd && (pwdProperties & DOMAIN_PASSWORD_STORE_CLEARTEXT) &&
+ (userAccountControl & UF_ENCRYPTED_TEXT_PASSWORD_ALLOWED)) {
+ CHECK_RET(ldb_msg_add_string(modify_msg, "unicodePwd", unicodePwd));
+ }
+
+ /* Even if we didn't get a unicodePwd, we can still setup
+ * krb5Key from the NT hash.
+ *
+ * This is an append, so it works with the 'continue' in the
+ * unicode loop above, to use Samba's NT hash function, which
+ * is more correct than Heimdal's
+ */
+ if (ntPwdHash) {
+ unsigned char *buf;
+ size_t buf_size;
+ size_t len;
+ struct ldb_val val;
+ Key key;
+
+ key.mkvno = 0;
+ key.salt = NULL; /* No salt for this enc type */
+
+ krb5_ret = krb5_keyblock_init(smb_krb5_context->krb5_context,
+ ENCTYPE_ARCFOUR_HMAC,
+ ntPwdHash->hash, sizeof(ntPwdHash->hash),
+ &key.key);
+ if (krb5_ret) {
+ return LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR;
+ }
+ ASN1_MALLOC_ENCODE(Key, buf, buf_size, &key, &len, krb5_ret);
+ krb5_free_keyblock_contents(smb_krb5_context->krb5_context,
+ &key.key);
+
+ val.data = talloc_memdup(req, buf, len);
+ val.length = len;
+ free(buf);
+ if (!val.data || ret) {
+ return LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR;
+ }
+ CHECK_RET(ldb_msg_add_value(modify_msg, "krb5Key", &val));
+ }
+
+ /* If the original caller did anything with pwdLastSet then skip this. It could be an incoming samsync */
+ if ((attribute = ldb_msg_find_element(msg, "pwdLastSet")) == NULL ) {
+ /* Update the password last set time */
+ unix_to_nt_time(&now_nt, now);
+ CHECK_RET(ldb_msg_add_empty(modify_msg, "pwdLastSet", LDB_FLAG_MOD_REPLACE));
+ CHECK_RET(samdb_msg_add_uint64(module->ldb, mem_ctx, modify_msg, "pwdLastSet", now_nt));
+ }
+
+ /* If the original caller did anything with "msDS-KeyVersionNumber" then skip this. It could be an incoming samsync */
+ if ((attribute = ldb_msg_find_element(msg, "msDS-KeyVersionNumber")) == NULL ) {
+ if (kvno == 0) {
+ CHECK_RET(ldb_msg_add_empty(modify_msg, "msDS-KeyVersionNumber",
+ LDB_FLAG_MOD_REPLACE));
+ CHECK_RET(samdb_msg_add_uint(module->ldb, mem_ctx, modify_msg, "msDS-KeyVersionNumber", kvno + 1));
+ } else {
+ /* While we should be in a transaction, go one extra
+ * step in the dance for an 'atomic' increment. This
+ * may be of value against remote LDAP servers. (Note
+ * however that Mulitmaster replication stil offers no
+ * such guarantee) */
+
+ struct ldb_val old_kvno, new_kvno;
+ old_kvno.data = (uint8_t *)talloc_asprintf(mem_ctx, "%u", kvno);
+ if (!old_kvno.data) {
+ return -1;
+ }
+ old_kvno.length = strlen((char *)old_kvno.data);
+
+ new_kvno.data = (uint8_t *)talloc_asprintf(mem_ctx, "%u", kvno + 1);
+ if (!new_kvno.data) {
+ return -1;
+ }
+ new_kvno.length = strlen((char *)new_kvno.data);
+
+ CHECK_RET(ldb_msg_add_empty(modify_msg, "msDS-KeyVersionNumber",
+ LDB_FLAG_MOD_DELETE));
+ CHECK_RET(ldb_msg_add_empty(modify_msg, "msDS-KeyVersionNumber",
+ LDB_FLAG_MOD_ADD));
+ modify_msg->elements[modify_msg->num_elements - 2].num_values = 1;
+ modify_msg->elements[modify_msg->num_elements - 2].values = &old_kvno;
+ modify_msg->elements[modify_msg->num_elements - 1].num_values = 1;
+ modify_msg->elements[modify_msg->num_elements - 1].values = &new_kvno;
+ }
+ }
+
+ CHECK_RET(ldb_msg_add_empty(modify_msg, "lmPwdHistory",
+ LDB_FLAG_MOD_REPLACE));
+ CHECK_RET(ldb_msg_add_empty(modify_msg, "ntPwdHistory",
+ LDB_FLAG_MOD_REPLACE));
+
+ /* If we have something to put into the history, or an old
+ * history element to expire, update the history */
+ if (pwdHistoryLength > 0 &&
+ ((ntPwdHistory_len > 0) || (lmPwdHistory_len > 0)
+ || lmOldHash || ntOldHash)) {
+ /* store the password history */
+ new_lmPwdHistory = talloc_array(mem_ctx, struct samr_Password,
+ pwdHistoryLength);
+ if (!new_lmPwdHistory) {
+ return LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR;
+ }
+ new_ntPwdHistory = talloc_array(mem_ctx, struct samr_Password,
+ pwdHistoryLength);
+ if (!new_ntPwdHistory) {
+ return LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR;
+ }
+ for (i=0;i<MIN(pwdHistoryLength-1, lmPwdHistory_len);i++) {
+ new_lmPwdHistory[i+1] = lmPwdHistory[i];
+ }
+ for (i=0;i<MIN(pwdHistoryLength-1, ntPwdHistory_len);i++) {
+ new_ntPwdHistory[i+1] = ntPwdHistory[i];
+ }
+
+ /* Don't store 'long' passwords in the LM history,
+ but make sure to 'expire' one password off the other end */
+ if (lmOldHash) {
+ new_lmPwdHistory[0] = *lmOldHash;
+ } else {
+ ZERO_STRUCT(new_lmPwdHistory[0]);
+ }
+ lmPwdHistory_len = MIN(lmPwdHistory_len + 1, pwdHistoryLength);
+
+ /* Likewise, we might not have a new NT password (lm
+ * only password change function) */
+ if (ntOldHash) {
+ new_ntPwdHistory[0] = *ntOldHash;
+ } else {
+ ZERO_STRUCT(new_ntPwdHistory[0]);
+ }
+ ntPwdHistory_len = MIN(ntPwdHistory_len + 1, pwdHistoryLength);
+
+ CHECK_RET(samdb_msg_add_hashes(module->ldb, mem_ctx, modify_msg,
+ "lmPwdHistory",
+ new_lmPwdHistory,
+ lmPwdHistory_len));
+
+ CHECK_RET(samdb_msg_add_hashes(module->ldb, mem_ctx, modify_msg,
+ "ntPwdHistory",
+ new_ntPwdHistory,
+ ntPwdHistory_len));
+ }
+
+ /* Too much code above, we should check we got it close to reasonable */
+ CHECK_RET(ldb_msg_sanity_check(modify_msg));
+
+ modify_request.operation = LDB_REQ_MODIFY;
+ modify_request.op.mod.message = modify_msg;
+
+ ret = ldb_next_request(module, &modify_request);
+
+ talloc_free(mem_ctx);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+/* add_record: do things with the unicodePwd attribute */
+static int password_hash_add(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request *req)
+{
+ const struct ldb_message *msg = req->op.add.message;
+
+ ldb_debug(module->ldb, LDB_DEBUG_TRACE, "password_hash_add_record\n");
+
+ if (ldb_dn_is_special(msg->dn)) { /* do not manipulate our control entries */
+ return ldb_next_request(module, req);
+ }
+
+ return password_hash_handle(module, req, msg);
+}
+
+/* modify_record: do things with the unicodePwd attribute */
+static int password_hash_modify(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request *req)
+{
+ const struct ldb_message *msg = req->op.mod.message;
+
+ ldb_debug(module->ldb, LDB_DEBUG_TRACE, "password_hash_modify_record\n");
+
+ if (ldb_dn_is_special(msg->dn)) { /* do not manipulate our control entries */
+ return ldb_next_request(module, req);
+ }
+
+ return password_hash_handle(module, req, msg);
+}
+
+static int password_hash_request(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request *req)
+{
+ switch (req->operation) {
+
+ case LDB_REQ_ADD:
+ return password_hash_add(module, req);
+
+ case LDB_REQ_MODIFY:
+ return password_hash_modify(module, req);
+
+ default:
+ return ldb_next_request(module, req);
+
+ }
+}
+
+static const struct ldb_module_ops password_hash_ops = {
+ .name = "password_hash",
+ .request = password_hash_request
+};
+
+
+/* the init function */
+#ifdef HAVE_DLOPEN_DISABLED
+ struct ldb_module *init_module(struct ldb_context *ldb, const char *options[])
+#else
+struct ldb_module *password_hash_module_init(struct ldb_context *ldb, const char *options[])
+#endif
+{
+ struct ldb_module *ctx;
+
+ ctx = talloc(ldb, struct ldb_module);
+ if (!ctx)
+ return NULL;
+
+ ctx->private_data = NULL;
+ ctx->ldb = ldb;
+ ctx->prev = ctx->next = NULL;
+ ctx->ops = &password_hash_ops;
+
+ return ctx;
+}