diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'source4/torture')
-rw-r--r-- | source4/torture/rpc/handles.c | 89 |
1 files changed, 53 insertions, 36 deletions
diff --git a/source4/torture/rpc/handles.c b/source4/torture/rpc/handles.c index 8449fba5f1..ee41ce67dd 100644 --- a/source4/torture/rpc/handles.c +++ b/source4/torture/rpc/handles.c @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ static bool test_handles_lsa(struct torture_context *torture) { NTSTATUS status; struct dcerpc_pipe *p1, *p2; + struct dcerpc_binding_handle *b1, *b2; struct policy_handle handle; struct policy_handle handle2; struct lsa_ObjectAttribute attr; @@ -46,9 +47,11 @@ static bool test_handles_lsa(struct torture_context *torture) status = torture_rpc_connection(torture, &p1, &ndr_table_lsarpc); torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, status, "opening lsa pipe1"); + b1 = p1->binding_handle; status = torture_rpc_connection(torture, &p2, &ndr_table_lsarpc); torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, status, "opening lsa pipe1"); + b2 = p2->binding_handle; qos.len = 0; qos.impersonation_level = 2; @@ -67,7 +70,7 @@ static bool test_handles_lsa(struct torture_context *torture) r.in.access_mask = SEC_FLAG_MAXIMUM_ALLOWED; r.out.handle = &handle; - status = dcerpc_lsa_OpenPolicy(p1, mem_ctx, &r); + status = dcerpc_lsa_OpenPolicy_r(b1, mem_ctx, &r); if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) { torture_comment(torture, "lsa_OpenPolicy not supported - skipping\n"); talloc_free(mem_ctx); @@ -77,16 +80,16 @@ static bool test_handles_lsa(struct torture_context *torture) c.in.handle = &handle; c.out.handle = &handle2; - status = dcerpc_lsa_Close(p2, mem_ctx, &c); + status = dcerpc_lsa_Close_r(b2, mem_ctx, &c); torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_NET_WRITE_FAULT, "closing policy handle on p2"); torture_assert_int_equal(torture, p2->last_fault_code, DCERPC_FAULT_CONTEXT_MISMATCH, "closing policy handle on p2"); - status = dcerpc_lsa_Close(p1, mem_ctx, &c); + status = dcerpc_lsa_Close_r(b1, mem_ctx, &c); torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, status, "closing policy handle on p1"); - status = dcerpc_lsa_Close(p1, mem_ctx, &c); + status = dcerpc_lsa_Close_r(b1, mem_ctx, &c); torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_NET_WRITE_FAULT, "closing policy handle on p1 again"); torture_assert_int_equal(torture, p1->last_fault_code, DCERPC_FAULT_CONTEXT_MISMATCH, @@ -101,6 +104,7 @@ static bool test_handles_lsa_shared(struct torture_context *torture) { NTSTATUS status; struct dcerpc_pipe *p1, *p2, *p3, *p4, *p5; + struct dcerpc_binding_handle *b1, *b2, *b3, *b4; struct policy_handle handle; struct policy_handle handle2; struct lsa_ObjectAttribute attr; @@ -119,6 +123,7 @@ static bool test_handles_lsa_shared(struct torture_context *torture) torture_comment(torture, "connect lsa pipe1\n"); status = torture_rpc_connection(torture, &p1, &ndr_table_lsarpc); torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, status, "opening lsa pipe1"); + b1 = p1->binding_handle; transport = p1->conn->transport.transport; assoc_group_id = p1->assoc_group_id; @@ -130,6 +135,7 @@ static bool test_handles_lsa_shared(struct torture_context *torture) transport, assoc_group_id); torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, status, "opening lsa pipe2"); + b2 = p2->binding_handle; torture_comment(torture, "got assoc_group_id[0x%08X] for p2\n", p2->assoc_group_id); @@ -152,7 +158,7 @@ static bool test_handles_lsa_shared(struct torture_context *torture) r.out.handle = &handle; torture_comment(torture, "open lsa policy handle\n"); - status = dcerpc_lsa_OpenPolicy(p1, mem_ctx, &r); + status = dcerpc_lsa_OpenPolicy_r(b1, mem_ctx, &r); if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) { torture_comment(torture, "lsa_OpenPolicy not supported - skipping\n"); talloc_free(mem_ctx); @@ -167,6 +173,7 @@ static bool test_handles_lsa_shared(struct torture_context *torture) transport, assoc_group_id); torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, status, "opening lsa pipe3"); + b3 = p3->binding_handle; qsec.in.handle = &handle; qsec.in.sec_info = 0; @@ -178,15 +185,15 @@ static bool test_handles_lsa_shared(struct torture_context *torture) * use policy handle on all 3 connections */ torture_comment(torture, "use the policy handle on p1,p2,p3\n"); - status = dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity(p1, mem_ctx, &qsec); + status = dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity_r(b1, mem_ctx, &qsec); torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_OK, "use policy handle on p1"); - status = dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity(p2, mem_ctx, &qsec); + status = dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity_r(b2, mem_ctx, &qsec); torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_OK, "use policy handle on p2"); - status = dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity(p3, mem_ctx, &qsec); + status = dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity_r(b3, mem_ctx, &qsec); torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_OK, "use policy handle on p3"); @@ -194,23 +201,23 @@ static bool test_handles_lsa_shared(struct torture_context *torture) * close policy handle on connection 2 and the others get a fault */ torture_comment(torture, "close the policy handle on p2 others get a fault\n"); - status = dcerpc_lsa_Close(p2, mem_ctx, &c); + status = dcerpc_lsa_Close_r(b2, mem_ctx, &c); torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_OK, "closing policy handle on p2"); - status = dcerpc_lsa_Close(p1, mem_ctx, &c); + status = dcerpc_lsa_Close_r(b1, mem_ctx, &c); torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_NET_WRITE_FAULT, "closing policy handle on p1 again"); torture_assert_int_equal(torture, p1->last_fault_code, DCERPC_FAULT_CONTEXT_MISMATCH, "closing policy handle on p1 again"); - status = dcerpc_lsa_Close(p3, mem_ctx, &c); + status = dcerpc_lsa_Close_r(b3, mem_ctx, &c); torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_NET_WRITE_FAULT, "closing policy handle on p3"); torture_assert_int_equal(torture, p3->last_fault_code, DCERPC_FAULT_CONTEXT_MISMATCH, "closing policy handle on p3"); - status = dcerpc_lsa_Close(p2, mem_ctx, &c); + status = dcerpc_lsa_Close_r(b2, mem_ctx, &c); torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_NET_WRITE_FAULT, "closing policy handle on p2 again"); torture_assert_int_equal(torture, p2->last_fault_code, DCERPC_FAULT_CONTEXT_MISMATCH, @@ -220,7 +227,7 @@ static bool test_handles_lsa_shared(struct torture_context *torture) * open a new policy handle on p3 */ torture_comment(torture, "open a new policy handle on p3\n"); - status = dcerpc_lsa_OpenPolicy(p3, mem_ctx, &r); + status = dcerpc_lsa_OpenPolicy_r(b3, mem_ctx, &r); torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_OK, "open policy handle on p3"); @@ -228,15 +235,15 @@ static bool test_handles_lsa_shared(struct torture_context *torture) * use policy handle on all 3 connections */ torture_comment(torture, "use the policy handle on p1,p2,p3\n"); - status = dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity(p1, mem_ctx, &qsec); + status = dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity_r(b1, mem_ctx, &qsec); torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_OK, "use policy handle on p1"); - status = dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity(p2, mem_ctx, &qsec); + status = dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity_r(b2, mem_ctx, &qsec); torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_OK, "use policy handle on p2"); - status = dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity(p3, mem_ctx, &qsec); + status = dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity_r(b3, mem_ctx, &qsec); torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_OK, "use policy handle on p3"); @@ -244,23 +251,23 @@ static bool test_handles_lsa_shared(struct torture_context *torture) * close policy handle on connection 2 and the others get a fault */ torture_comment(torture, "close the policy handle on p2 others get a fault\n"); - status = dcerpc_lsa_Close(p2, mem_ctx, &c); + status = dcerpc_lsa_Close_r(b2, mem_ctx, &c); torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_OK, "closing policy handle on p2"); - status = dcerpc_lsa_Close(p1, mem_ctx, &c); + status = dcerpc_lsa_Close_r(b1, mem_ctx, &c); torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_NET_WRITE_FAULT, "closing policy handle on p1 again"); torture_assert_int_equal(torture, p1->last_fault_code, DCERPC_FAULT_CONTEXT_MISMATCH, "closing policy handle on p1 again"); - status = dcerpc_lsa_Close(p3, mem_ctx, &c); + status = dcerpc_lsa_Close_r(b3, mem_ctx, &c); torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_NET_WRITE_FAULT, "closing policy handle on p3"); torture_assert_int_equal(torture, p3->last_fault_code, DCERPC_FAULT_CONTEXT_MISMATCH, "closing policy handle on p3"); - status = dcerpc_lsa_Close(p2, mem_ctx, &c); + status = dcerpc_lsa_Close_r(b2, mem_ctx, &c); torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_NET_WRITE_FAULT, "closing policy handle on p2 again"); torture_assert_int_equal(torture, p2->last_fault_code, DCERPC_FAULT_CONTEXT_MISMATCH, @@ -270,11 +277,11 @@ static bool test_handles_lsa_shared(struct torture_context *torture) * open a new policy handle */ torture_comment(torture, "open a new policy handle on p1 and use it\n"); - status = dcerpc_lsa_OpenPolicy(p1, mem_ctx, &r); + status = dcerpc_lsa_OpenPolicy_r(b1, mem_ctx, &r); torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_OK, "open 2nd policy handle on p1"); - status = dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity(p1, mem_ctx, &qsec); + status = dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity_r(b1, mem_ctx, &qsec); torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_OK, "QuerySecurity handle on p1"); @@ -287,11 +294,11 @@ static bool test_handles_lsa_shared(struct torture_context *torture) * and it's still available on p2,p3 */ torture_comment(torture, "use policy handle on p2,p3\n"); - status = dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity(p2, mem_ctx, &qsec); + status = dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity_r(b2, mem_ctx, &qsec); torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_OK, "QuerySecurity handle on p2 after p1 was disconnected"); - status = dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity(p3, mem_ctx, &qsec); + status = dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity_r(b3, mem_ctx, &qsec); torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_OK, "QuerySecurity handle on p3 after p1 was disconnected"); @@ -304,8 +311,9 @@ static bool test_handles_lsa_shared(struct torture_context *torture) transport, assoc_group_id); torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, status, "opening lsa pipe4"); + b4 = p4->binding_handle; - status = dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity(p4, mem_ctx, &qsec); + status = dcerpc_lsa_QuerySecurity_r(b4, mem_ctx, &qsec); torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_OK, "using policy handle on p4"); @@ -339,6 +347,7 @@ static bool test_handles_samr(struct torture_context *torture) { NTSTATUS status; struct dcerpc_pipe *p1, *p2; + struct dcerpc_binding_handle *b1, *b2; struct policy_handle handle; struct policy_handle handle2; struct samr_Connect r; @@ -349,30 +358,32 @@ static bool test_handles_samr(struct torture_context *torture) status = torture_rpc_connection(torture, &p1, &ndr_table_samr); torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, status, "opening samr pipe1"); + b1 = p1->binding_handle; status = torture_rpc_connection(torture, &p2, &ndr_table_samr); torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, status, "opening samr pipe1"); + b2 = p2->binding_handle; r.in.system_name = 0; r.in.access_mask = SEC_FLAG_MAXIMUM_ALLOWED; r.out.connect_handle = &handle; - status = dcerpc_samr_Connect(p1, mem_ctx, &r); + status = dcerpc_samr_Connect_r(b1, mem_ctx, &r); torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, status, "opening policy handle on p1"); c.in.handle = &handle; c.out.handle = &handle2; - status = dcerpc_samr_Close(p2, mem_ctx, &c); + status = dcerpc_samr_Close_r(b2, mem_ctx, &c); torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_NET_WRITE_FAULT, "closing policy handle on p2"); torture_assert_int_equal(torture, p2->last_fault_code, DCERPC_FAULT_CONTEXT_MISMATCH, "closing policy handle on p2"); - status = dcerpc_samr_Close(p1, mem_ctx, &c); + status = dcerpc_samr_Close_r(b1, mem_ctx, &c); torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, status, "closing policy handle on p1"); - status = dcerpc_samr_Close(p1, mem_ctx, &c); + status = dcerpc_samr_Close_r(b1, mem_ctx, &c); torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_NET_WRITE_FAULT, "closing policy handle on p1 again"); torture_assert_int_equal(torture, p1->last_fault_code, DCERPC_FAULT_CONTEXT_MISMATCH, @@ -387,6 +398,7 @@ static bool test_handles_mixed_shared(struct torture_context *torture) { NTSTATUS status; struct dcerpc_pipe *p1, *p2, *p3, *p4, *p5, *p6; + struct dcerpc_binding_handle *b1, *b2; struct policy_handle handle; struct policy_handle handle2; struct samr_Connect r; @@ -401,6 +413,7 @@ static bool test_handles_mixed_shared(struct torture_context *torture) torture_comment(torture, "connect samr pipe1\n"); status = torture_rpc_connection(torture, &p1, &ndr_table_samr); torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, status, "opening samr pipe1"); + b1 = p1->binding_handle; transport = p1->conn->transport.transport; assoc_group_id = p1->assoc_group_id; @@ -412,6 +425,7 @@ static bool test_handles_mixed_shared(struct torture_context *torture) transport, assoc_group_id); torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, status, "opening lsa pipe2"); + b2 = p2->binding_handle; torture_comment(torture, "got assoc_group_id[0x%08X] for p2\n", p2->assoc_group_id); @@ -420,7 +434,7 @@ static bool test_handles_mixed_shared(struct torture_context *torture) r.out.connect_handle = &handle; torture_comment(torture, "samr_Connect to open a policy handle on samr p1\n"); - status = dcerpc_samr_Connect(p1, mem_ctx, &r); + status = dcerpc_samr_Connect_r(b1, mem_ctx, &r); torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, status, "opening policy handle on p1"); lc.in.handle = &handle; @@ -429,14 +443,14 @@ static bool test_handles_mixed_shared(struct torture_context *torture) sc.out.handle = &handle2; torture_comment(torture, "use policy handle on lsa p2 - should fail\n"); - status = dcerpc_lsa_Close(p2, mem_ctx, &lc); + status = dcerpc_lsa_Close_r(b2, mem_ctx, &lc); torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_NET_WRITE_FAULT, "closing handle on lsa p2"); torture_assert_int_equal(torture, p2->last_fault_code, DCERPC_FAULT_CONTEXT_MISMATCH, "closing handle on lsa p2"); torture_comment(torture, "closing policy handle on samr p1\n"); - status = dcerpc_samr_Close(p1, mem_ctx, &sc); + status = dcerpc_samr_Close_r(b1, mem_ctx, &sc); torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, status, "closing policy handle on p1"); talloc_free(p1); @@ -519,6 +533,7 @@ static bool test_handles_drsuapi(struct torture_context *torture) { NTSTATUS status; struct dcerpc_pipe *p1, *p2; + struct dcerpc_binding_handle *b1, *b2; struct policy_handle handle; struct policy_handle handle2; struct GUID bind_guid; @@ -530,9 +545,11 @@ static bool test_handles_drsuapi(struct torture_context *torture) status = torture_rpc_connection(torture, &p1, &ndr_table_drsuapi); torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, status, "opening drsuapi pipe1"); + b1 = p1->binding_handle; status = torture_rpc_connection(torture, &p2, &ndr_table_drsuapi); torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, status, "opening drsuapi pipe1"); + b2 = p2->binding_handle; GUID_from_string(DRSUAPI_DS_BIND_GUID, &bind_guid); @@ -540,7 +557,7 @@ static bool test_handles_drsuapi(struct torture_context *torture) r.in.bind_info = NULL; r.out.bind_handle = &handle; - status = dcerpc_drsuapi_DsBind(p1, mem_ctx, &r); + status = dcerpc_drsuapi_DsBind_r(b1, mem_ctx, &r); if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) { torture_comment(torture, "drsuapi_DsBind not supported - skipping\n"); talloc_free(mem_ctx); @@ -550,16 +567,16 @@ static bool test_handles_drsuapi(struct torture_context *torture) c.in.bind_handle = &handle; c.out.bind_handle = &handle2; - status = dcerpc_drsuapi_DsUnbind(p2, mem_ctx, &c); + status = dcerpc_drsuapi_DsUnbind_r(b2, mem_ctx, &c); torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_NET_WRITE_FAULT, "closing policy handle on p2"); torture_assert_int_equal(torture, p2->last_fault_code, DCERPC_FAULT_CONTEXT_MISMATCH, "closing policy handle on p2"); - status = dcerpc_drsuapi_DsUnbind(p1, mem_ctx, &c); + status = dcerpc_drsuapi_DsUnbind_r(b1, mem_ctx, &c); torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(torture, status, "closing policy handle on p1"); - status = dcerpc_drsuapi_DsUnbind(p1, mem_ctx, &c); + status = dcerpc_drsuapi_DsUnbind_r(b1, mem_ctx, &c); torture_assert_ntstatus_equal(torture, status, NT_STATUS_NET_WRITE_FAULT, "closing policy handle on p1 again"); torture_assert_int_equal(torture, p1->last_fault_code, DCERPC_FAULT_CONTEXT_MISMATCH, |