summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/source4
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'source4')
-rw-r--r--source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/linked_attributes.c31
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 16 deletions
diff --git a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/linked_attributes.c b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/linked_attributes.c
index 393f00fdb6..69488001d9 100644
--- a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/linked_attributes.c
+++ b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/linked_attributes.c
@@ -45,7 +45,6 @@ struct la_op_store {
enum la_op {LA_OP_ADD, LA_OP_DEL} op;
struct GUID guid;
char *name;
- char *value;
};
struct replace_context {
@@ -59,8 +58,7 @@ struct la_context {
const struct dsdb_schema *schema;
struct ldb_module *module;
struct ldb_request *req;
- struct ldb_dn *add_dn;
- struct ldb_dn *del_dn;
+ struct ldb_dn *mod_dn;
struct replace_context *rc;
struct la_op_store *ops;
struct ldb_extended *op_response;
@@ -319,7 +317,7 @@ static int la_mod_search_callback(struct ldb_request *req, struct ldb_reply *are
LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR);
}
- ac->add_dn = ac->del_dn = talloc_steal(ac, ares->message->dn);
+ ac->mod_dn = talloc_steal(ac, ares->message->dn);
/* We don't populate 'rc' for ADD - it can't be deleting elements anyway */
for (i = 0; rc && i < rc->num_elements; i++) {
@@ -572,9 +570,9 @@ static int linked_attributes_modify(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_reques
/* We need to figure out our own extended DN, to fill in as the backlink target */
if (ret == LDB_SUCCESS) {
- ret = ldb_request_add_control(search_req,
- LDB_CONTROL_EXTENDED_DN_OID,
- false, NULL);
+ ret = dsdb_request_add_controls(search_req,
+ DSDB_SEARCH_SHOW_DELETED |
+ DSDB_SEARCH_SHOW_EXTENDED_DN);
}
if (ret == LDB_SUCCESS) {
talloc_steal(search_req, attrs);
@@ -867,9 +865,9 @@ static int la_add_callback(struct ldb_request *req, struct ldb_reply *ares)
LDB_REQ_SET_LOCATION(search_req);
if (ret == LDB_SUCCESS) {
- ret = ldb_request_add_control(search_req,
- LDB_CONTROL_EXTENDED_DN_OID,
- false, NULL);
+ ret = dsdb_request_add_controls(search_req,
+ DSDB_SEARCH_SHOW_DELETED |
+ DSDB_SEARCH_SHOW_EXTENDED_DN);
}
if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) {
return ldb_module_done(ac->req, NULL, NULL,
@@ -941,6 +939,11 @@ static int la_do_op_request(struct ldb_module *module, struct la_context *ac, st
struct ldb_context *ldb;
int ret;
+ if (ac->mod_dn == NULL) {
+ /* we didn't find the DN that we searched for */
+ return LDB_SUCCESS;
+ }
+
ldb = ldb_module_get_ctx(ac->module);
/* Create the modify request */
@@ -969,11 +972,7 @@ static int la_do_op_request(struct ldb_module *module, struct la_context *ac, st
return ldb_oom(ldb);
}
ret_el->num_values = 1;
- if (op->op == LA_OP_ADD) {
- ret_el->values[0] = data_blob_string_const(ldb_dn_get_extended_linearized(new_msg, ac->add_dn, 1));
- } else {
- ret_el->values[0] = data_blob_string_const(ldb_dn_get_extended_linearized(new_msg, ac->del_dn, 1));
- }
+ ret_el->values[0] = data_blob_string_const(ldb_dn_get_extended_linearized(new_msg, ac->mod_dn, 1));
/* a backlink should never be single valued. Unfortunately the
exchange schema has a attribute
@@ -996,7 +995,7 @@ static int la_do_op_request(struct ldb_module *module, struct la_context *ac, st
ret = dsdb_module_modify(module, new_msg, DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE, ac->req);
if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) {
- ldb_debug(ldb, LDB_DEBUG_WARNING, "Failed to apply linked attribute change '%s'\n%s\n",
+ ldb_debug(ldb, LDB_DEBUG_WARNING, __location__ ": failed to apply linked attribute change '%s'\n%s\n",
ldb_errstring(ldb),
ldb_ldif_message_string(ldb, op, LDB_CHANGETYPE_MODIFY, new_msg));
}