Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
The function already used 'uint8_t' instead of 'uint8'.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
We should not overwrite the error with NT_STATUS_PIPE_NOT_AVAILABLE.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
dcerpc_secondary_context()
This avoids the use of dcerpc_smb_tree(), which is a layer violation.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Gregor Beck <gbeck@sernet.de>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Gregor Beck <gbeck@sernet.de>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Gregor Beck <gbeck@sernet.de>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Gregor Beck <gbeck@sernet.de>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Gregor Beck <gbeck@sernet.de>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
We can directly use smb_raw_open() to open a handle to a named pipe.
This avoids the need for the layer violation functions
dcerpc_smb_tree() and dcerpc_smb_fnum().
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
changes (part2)
We now use smbXcli_conn_is_connected() and
dcerpc_binding_handle_is_connected() to verify only the dcerpc layer
got an error. The expected error is EIO mapped to NT_STATUS_IO_DEVICE_ERROR.
NT_STATUS_INVALID_HANDLE should only be visible at the SMB layer,
but we keep this as allowed return value for now, until
the dcerpc layer is fixed.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
code changes (part1)
Some code uses the low level smbXcli_session structure instead of
the smbcli_session structure and doesn't 'see' updates to the
smbcli_session structure.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
Windows spoolss print clients only allow association of server-side
drivers with printers when the driver architecture matches the
advertised print server architecture. Samba's spoolss print server
architecture can be changed using this parameter.
Signed-off-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Günther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Günther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Oct 16 17:12:34 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Oct 16 11:39:41 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
This also ensures we remove prototypes from parameters we remove or
rename, and easily see how many special cases we have left.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
This allows us to use more lpcfg_ functions without adding them
manually.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
This autogenerates the parameters so that we can keep everything in sync easier,
particularly when adding new parameters. This will also make it easier to move
to a fully autogenerated system in the future, as it reduces special cases.
Andrew Bartlett
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
string parameters
This allows us not to generate array entries for these, which in turn allows
us to avoid initialising them. The issue is that we do not have the
% macro sub context nor a talloc context handy (yet).
Andrew Bartlett
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
FN_LOCAL_PARM_CHAR
This was found when trying to autogenerate prototypes for lp_ functions again.
Andrew Bartlett
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
Modified to include common.h entry for netapitest_wksta function by Kai
Blin <kai@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Hans Leidekker <hans@meelstraat.net>
Reviewed-by: Kai Blin <kai@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Oct 16 07:00:45 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
Only one call to delay_for_oplocks left. Metze showed me the new logic:
BATCH is broken if we have a sharing violation. Exclusive is broken
otherwise. That's it.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Oct 16 02:51:53 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
No clue what this does. In open_directory, "dir_existed" is not used after
open_mode_check. In open_file_ntcreate it's used, but I can't think of a case
right now where we would find a formerly nonexisting file to exist suddenly.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
This makes grant_fsp_oplock_type independent from the values computed
in validate_oplock_types. It *might* make oplock calculation a bit
slower for heavily shared files, as we are walking the share mode array
twice. But we are doing so much stuff in open that I doubt the difference
is measurable. It clears up the code for me however, and I think that's
worth it.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
This removes two variables in open_file_ntcreate based on the observation
that for exclusive and batch oplocks there can only be one entry. So
in these cases we don't need to keep pointers from find_oplock_types to
delay_for_oplocks. We can just reference the only share mode entry around.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
Will be used in the next commit
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
smb_panic() does not take a printf style argument. This improves debug
output by easily printing the index that we fell over. Also, doing
smb_panic deep down is bad style IMHO.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
share_mode_data.num_share_modes is a uint32.
48 bytes less in .o text size for -O3 :-)
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
This is the same code in both routines
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
Define a variable to dereference lck->data just once. Believe it or not,
this saves a few bytes .o with -O3 :-)
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
This attempts reauth with invalid creds, hence
triggering the error path in the reauth code.
This invalidates the session and subsequente requests
on that connection fail.
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10208
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Oct 15 22:50:27 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10208
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10208
Authentication error in smb2 session reauth invalidates
the session. In this case the session must in contrast
to successful session setup requests be torn down and live
no longer than the request.
The talloc move of the session from the global session
table to the request ensures that the session setup
reply can still be correctly signed, but subsequent
requests on the connection don't find a session any more.
Pair-Programmed-With: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Pair-Programmed-With: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
With the special case for bug 5980 in do_break_to_none we only have
one caller: process_oplock_async_level2_break_message. The further
goal is to merge process_oplock_async_level2_break_message with
process_oplock_break_message.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Oct 15 03:42:53 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
With the level2 indicator in brlock.tdb this race condition does not
exist anymore
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
With FAKE_LEVEL_II_OPLOCKS around we did not grant LEVEL2 after
a NO_OPLOCK file got written to. Windows does grant LEVEL2 in this
case. With the have_level2_oplocks in brlocks.tdb we can now grant LEVEL2
in this case as well.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
FAKE_LEVEL_II_OPLOCK was an indicator to break level2 oplock holders
on write. This information is now being held in brlock.tdb, which makes
the FAKE_LEVEL_II_OPLOCK type unnecessary.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
This implements an idea by metze: Right now Samba does not grant level2
oplocks where it should: After an initial no-oplock open that has been
written to, we don't have the FAKE_LEVEL2_OPLOCK entry in locking.tdb
around anymore, this downgraded to NO_OPLOCK. Windows in this case will
grant level2 if being asked, we don't. Part of the reason for this
is that we don't have a proper mechanism to communicate the fact that
level2 needs to be broken to other smbds. Metze's insight was that we
have to look into brlock.tdb for every write anyway, so this might be
the right place to store this information.
My first reaction was that this is really hackish, but on further thought
this is not. oplocks depend on brlocks anyway, and we have the proper
mechanisms in place for brlocks.
The format for this change is to add one byte to the end of the brlock.tdb
record with value 1 if we have level2 oplocks around. Thus this patch
effectively reverts 8f41142 which I discovered while writing this
change. We now legally have unaligned records.
We can certainly talk about the format, but I'm not yet convinced we
need an idl for this yet. This is a potentially very hot code path,
and ndr marshalling has a cost.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|