| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
This needs access checks!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael
|
|
This is to cope with timeouts when recoveries and transactions collide.
Maybe 100 is too hight, but 10 or even 20 have been too low in a
very busy environment.
Michael
|
|
so that it is correctly handled by recoveries.
Also set the dmaster explicitly.
Michael
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implement the win7 NT_STATUS_INVALID_LOCK_RANGE.
Make smbd behave as Windows does in canceling locks.
Jeremy.
|
|
Jeremy.
|
|
talloc()ed memory should not be SAFE_FREE()ed.
Signed-off-by: Jim McDonough <jmcd@samba.org>
|
|
Including new tests for:
- spoolss_SetPrinterDataEx
- spoolss_DeletePrinterDataEx
- spoolss_DeletePrinterKey
Guenther
|
|
The check for iconv requiring giconv.h and libgiconv as well as
the check for iconv requiring biconv.h and libbiconv were using the wrong
variable to check for previous successful test results. This caused the checks
to always fall back to libbiconv on systems where that library was available.
In the course of fixing this, I had to clean up the indentation in that piece of
code, and I also rewrote/added some comments.
Many thanks to Tsurutani Naoki <turutani@scphys.kyoto-u.ac.jp> for the initial
patch and diagnosis.
|
|
The show_deleted module was using a static private ptr in the module
to hold a parse tree to save on parsing. The code caused this
static ptr to change with each search, which caused incorrect
searches and numerous valgrind errors.
This patch replaces it with a hand-built parse tree.
|
|
In general functions that don't return any memory should not take a memory context.
Otherwise it is too easy to have a bug like this where memory is leaked
|
|
deprecated command
Signed-off-by: Tim Prouty <tprouty@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Tim Prouty <tprouty@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Tim Prouty <tprouty@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Tim Prouty <tprouty@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Tim Prouty <tprouty@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Tim Prouty <tprouty@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Tim Prouty <tprouty@samba.org>
|
|
changes
Two new samba4 bugs have been filed for the two corresponding known
failures. For the short term raw.sfileinfo had to be removed from
quicktest. It is no longer an individual test, but a test-suite and
quicktest can only run top level tests.
|
|
Try a rename with a wide-open share mode on an already open file
and the there is still share mode contention. For the reason why
see:
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/os_fileservices/thread/3ca14dc9-da1f-4786-a8f7-a86e9903db0c
Msft's anser:
After further review, The reason for server to fail with sharing
violation is that the windows server that executes a path-based
rename request opens the file for DELETE access, but only with
FILE_SHARED_READ as ShareAccess . Therefore, the existing
open(frame 76), which has shared read/write/delete , is compatible
with the Windows servers access mode (DELETE), but Windows servers
open is not compatible with access mode in existing open.
Note that it is correct to state that the logic in Windows server
could have been written to allow shared read/write/delete in which
case it would succeed as you mention. The behavior here is
historical based on the existing implementation.
|
|
|
|
Some servers choose to mark a client as bad if they fail an oplock
break request by timing out (win7 is an example). Once the client is
marked as bad, future oplock requests will timeout instantly. This
causes subsequent runs of this test to fail, so rather than erroring
out as a failure, a warning is printed instead.
There is also a bug in w2k3 where it was incorrectly returning
contending a share mode lock. It worked in XP and has been re-fixed
in win7.
This can also now be run against samba3.
|
|
|
|
|
|
breaks
|
|
Jeremy.
|
|
fsp->fsp_name.
Moving towards making VFS_OPEN/VFS_MKDIR/VFS_RMDIR
handle based...
Jeremy.
|
|
In case someone (smbtorture4) requests SEC_FLAG_MAXIMUM_ALLOWED, translate it
to a request of PRINTER_ACCESS_ADMINISTER.
Guenther
|
|
Guenther
|
|
Guenther
|
|
calls are now handle based. Put rmdir into close.c
and make it private.
Jeremy.
|
|
|
|
I removed one "const" in front of a string declaration to achieve this.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Tridgell <tridge@samba.org>
|
|
I removed two "const"s in front of string declarations to achieve this.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Tridgell <tridge@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Bo Yang <boyang@samba.org>
|
|
can_set_delete_on_close() is correctly called before any setting
of the disposition bit (clean up the do_unlink() call).
Jeremy.
|
|
|
|
this function is only called when strict alloc is set, no reason to check that twice.
|
|
See what happens when we have multiple outstanding lock requests and
we try to cancel both of them within a single LockingAndX.
On Windows, it seems only the first lock in the array is cancelled,
and the second is left pending. Though, this behavior goes against
the MS-CIFS spec.
|
|
* test that 2 locks in a single LockAndX are transactional
* test that 1 unlock and 1 lock in a single LockAndX are not
transactional
* test that SMB2 doesn't like mixed lock/unlock in a single
PDU
|
|
|
|
Abstract the server requirements to pass some BRL tests.
* The new default for >64bit lock tests, is that the server should
return STATUS_INVALID_LOCK_RANGE.
* Add parameter for targets that don't implement DENY_DOS
|
|
Guenther
|
|
Guenther
|
|
spoolss_EnumPrinterKey.
This call is just driving me nuts :-)
Guenther
|
