Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
This is necessary to allow talloc pools to be objects on their own. It
is an incompatible change in the sense that talloc_get_size(pool) now
returns 0 instead of the pool size. When the talloc_pooled_object()
call is added, this will start to make sense again.
Maybe we should add a talloc_pool_size call? Or is that overkill?
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
This is a preparation to make talloc pool real objects themselves.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
This will allow to exchange the extra talloc pool header with the
talloc_chunk structure
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
If we want nested pools, we will have pools that are pool members. So
we will have to have a separate "next object" pointer for pools. As
we have struct talloc_pool_chunk now, this additional pointer does not
affect normal talloc objects.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
changing smb server version from 4.9 to 6.1 to
mimic win2k8r2.
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Sep 6 19:41:51 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Sep 6 15:29:55 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
We don't have lck allocated yet at these points. Remove the TALLOC_FREE
calls that triggered me looking for the get_share_mode_lock calls.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
There's no point checking the validity of the "entry" argument more
than once
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
This flag existed to break an exclusive or batch oplock in just one
instead of two steps down to "no oplock" when we did an allocation or file
size change. Running raw.oplock against W2k12 differs in this respect
from W2k3: W2k12 takes two steps (via level2) to break to none. This
removes the special flag that we only had for compatibility with systems
older than W2k12...
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Sep 6 00:47:07 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
W2k12 seems to do the 2-step break to none, try running raw.oplock.batch12
against it.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
This needs doing even if we don't have strct allocate set. The client
should not know that we lied. Fixes smb2.oplock.batch12.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Sep 5 20:09:21 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Sep 4 22:36:24 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
If we get an oplock break response, we forgot to remove the oplock break
timeout.
Found by stopping raw.oplock.exclusive5 after the 2nd open and watching a debug
level 10 log. This amends 08a9de89 from 2007.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
This exercises some more of the dlz_bind9 code outside BIND, by
sending in a ticket to be access checked, wrapped either in SPNEGO or
just in GSSAPI.
Andrew Bartlett
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Sep 4 11:25:10 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
This does not check that the command runs correctly, but does at least check
that the command runs to completion without errors.
Andrew Bartlett
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
This shows that the internal server can use the dns-SERVER account.
Andrew Bartlett
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
We do this by having the samba-tool domain dcpromo for promoted_vampire_dc also create a
dns-SERVER account.
Andrew Bartlett
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
This avoids asking for attributes that will not be used, and looks only for the
expected exceptions, rather than all exceptions.
Andrew Bartlett
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
This will ensure that the DLZ plugin works out of the box when joining a second Samba DC to the
domain.
Andrew Bartlett
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
already did a NULL query.
Bug 5917 - Samba does not work on site with Read Only Domain Controller
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Sep 4 01:19:05 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
function.
Bug 5917 - Samba does not work on site with Read Only Domain Controller
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Sharpe <rsharpe@samba.org>
|
|
Leave dsgetdcname_internal() only using const char *site_name.
Bug 5917 - Samba does not work on site with Read Only Domain Controller
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Sharpe <rsharpe@samba.org>
|
|
Bug 5917 - Samba does not work on site with Read Only Domain Controller
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Sharpe <rsharpe@samba.org>
|
|
Bug 5917 - Samba does not work on site with Read Only Domain Controller
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Sharpe <rsharpe@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Sep 3 19:13:14 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
The comment for this routine said:
> Modifies d->num_share_modes, watch out in routines iterating over
> that array.
Well, it turns out that *every* caller of this API got it wrong. So I
think it's better to change the routine.
This leaves the array untouched while iterating but filters out the
deleted ones while saving them back to disk.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
We'll need "i" in a later checkin ... :-)
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
Hey, pidl knows the [skip] attribute ... :-)
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Sep 2 23:03:01 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|