Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
share_mode_data.num_share_modes is a uint32.
48 bytes less in .o text size for -O3 :-)
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
This is the same code in both routines
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
Define a variable to dereference lck->data just once. Believe it or not,
this saves a few bytes .o with -O3 :-)
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
This attempts reauth with invalid creds, hence
triggering the error path in the reauth code.
This invalidates the session and subsequente requests
on that connection fail.
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10208
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Oct 15 22:50:27 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10208
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10208
Authentication error in smb2 session reauth invalidates
the session. In this case the session must in contrast
to successful session setup requests be torn down and live
no longer than the request.
The talloc move of the session from the global session
table to the request ensures that the session setup
reply can still be correctly signed, but subsequent
requests on the connection don't find a session any more.
Pair-Programmed-With: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Pair-Programmed-With: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
With the special case for bug 5980 in do_break_to_none we only have
one caller: process_oplock_async_level2_break_message. The further
goal is to merge process_oplock_async_level2_break_message with
process_oplock_break_message.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Oct 15 03:42:53 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
With the level2 indicator in brlock.tdb this race condition does not
exist anymore
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
With FAKE_LEVEL_II_OPLOCKS around we did not grant LEVEL2 after
a NO_OPLOCK file got written to. Windows does grant LEVEL2 in this
case. With the have_level2_oplocks in brlocks.tdb we can now grant LEVEL2
in this case as well.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
FAKE_LEVEL_II_OPLOCK was an indicator to break level2 oplock holders
on write. This information is now being held in brlock.tdb, which makes
the FAKE_LEVEL_II_OPLOCK type unnecessary.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
This implements an idea by metze: Right now Samba does not grant level2
oplocks where it should: After an initial no-oplock open that has been
written to, we don't have the FAKE_LEVEL2_OPLOCK entry in locking.tdb
around anymore, this downgraded to NO_OPLOCK. Windows in this case will
grant level2 if being asked, we don't. Part of the reason for this
is that we don't have a proper mechanism to communicate the fact that
level2 needs to be broken to other smbds. Metze's insight was that we
have to look into brlock.tdb for every write anyway, so this might be
the right place to store this information.
My first reaction was that this is really hackish, but on further thought
this is not. oplocks depend on brlocks anyway, and we have the proper
mechanisms in place for brlocks.
The format for this change is to add one byte to the end of the brlock.tdb
record with value 1 if we have level2 oplocks around. Thus this patch
effectively reverts 8f41142 which I discovered while writing this
change. We now legally have unaligned records.
We can certainly talk about the format, but I'm not yet convinced we
need an idl for this yet. This is a potentially very hot code path,
and ndr marshalling has a cost.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Oct 15 01:51:39 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
This uses the documeted "winbindd socket directory" parameter instead.
This came about due to the merge of the two smb.conf tables in s3 and
s4 for the Samba 4.0 release. The s4 code used a real parameter,
which caused this to be documented, whereas no automatic procedure
existed to notice the parametric option and the need to document that.
The fact that this was not used consistently in both codebases is one
of the many areas of technical debt we still need to pay off here.
Andrew Bartlett
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Kai Blin <kai@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Oct 14 23:05:54 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
In handling RemoteFindFirstPrinterChangeNotifyEx requests, the spoolss
server can establish a "backchannel" connection to the print client, as
a mechanism for sending print notifications. This behaviour is governed
by the "print notify backchannel" smb.conf parameter.
This change sets "print notify backchannel" to "no" by default, which
sees Samba respond to RemoteFindFirstPrinterChangeNotifyEx requests with
WERR_SERVER_UNAVAILABLE. In recieving such a response, print clients can
fall back to polling for print queue changes.
Signed-off-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Günther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Günther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Oct 14 18:49:41 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
On talloc_realloc failure, asn1_write calls talloc_free on an asn1_data
pointer and then tries to immediately set the has_error flag on it.
Skip the free and just set the has_error flag.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Oct 14 16:54:35 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
According to [MS-SAMR] 3.1.5.7 Delete Pattern we should not allow deletion
of security objects with RID < 1000. This patch will prevent deletion of
well-known accounts and groups.
Signed-off-by: Nadezhda Ivanova <nivanova@symas.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Nadezhda Ivanova <nivanova@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Oct 14 13:31:50 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sun Oct 13 17:58:23 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sun Oct 13 14:35:26 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
This came from delete_on_close handling which was factored out.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Christof Schmitt <cs@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sat Oct 12 13:00:02 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
Signed-off-by: Christof Schmitt <cs@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
|
|
We need to check for DELETE_PENDING before the first oplock break
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sat Oct 12 01:56:18 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
If delete_on_close is set, there is no oplock break. Check that.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
If delete_on_close is set, there is no oplock break. Check that.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
This fixes a GCC warning.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Bokovoy <ab@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Oct 11 18:05:19 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
|
|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10194
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Oct 11 13:37:56 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10194
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
|
|
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10194
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
|
|
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10194
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
|
|
DomainDNSZone only
This skips handling the ForestDNSZone when we are setting up a subdomain.
Andrew Bartlett
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Oct 11 10:27:49 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
connection to IPC$
The treeConnect&X of the GUID name fails against Windows 2003.
Andrew Bartlett
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
NC we replicate
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
repl.replicate() call
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
provision
This avoids confusion, because the LDAP backend does not use these,
and they do not set the password for the administrator account either!
This may break support for the 'existing' backend LDAP backend, but
that is nothing more than a stub for future development anyway, and
new work in this area should use EXTERNAL in any case.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Oct 10 10:24:55 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
metadata.tdb
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
This is what Windows 2008 R2 returns:
LDB_MOD_ADD => LDB_ERR_UNWILLING_TO_PERFORM
LDB_MOD_REPLACE => LDB_ERR_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATION
LDB_MOD_DEL => LDB_ERR_UNWILLING_TO_PERFORM
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
The attribute on the RootDSE object is called 'dnsHostName'
instead of 'dNSHostName' (which is used in the schema and on
all other directory objects).
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10193
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10193
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
In 816e68f94fe500b9d68fd29021d432b84d3139b7 the display of unset bits has been
effectively disabled while only the check for 0 bits was supposed to be avoided
(because it creates the infite loop).
Guenther
Signed-off-by: Günther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Günther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Oct 9 19:56:39 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Patou <mat@matws.net>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Oct 9 10:31:25 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Patou <mat@matws.net>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|