| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
The flags are user-visible, via tdb_get_flags/add_flags/remove_flags.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
thread/fork safe tdb_reopen_all() should be a noop".
This version just wraps the reopen code, so we still re-grab the lock and do
the normal sanity checks.
The reason we do this at all is to avoid global fd limits, see:
http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=210393
Note also that this whole reopen concept is fundamentally racy: if the parent
goes away before the child calls tdb_reopen_all, the database can be left
without an active lock and another TDB_CLEAR_IF_FIRST opener will clear it.
A fork_with_tdbs() wrapper could use a pipe to solve this, but it's hardly
elegant (what if there are other independent things which have similar needs?).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
tdb_reopen_all() should be a noop"
This reverts commit e17df483fbedb81aededdef5fbb6ae1d034bc2dd.
tdb_reopen_all also restores the active lock, required for TDB_CLEAR_IF_FIRST.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
current code does a free of the old record in this case, then fail.
|
|
might take us out-of-bounds. Only pretend to be length 1 for the malloc.
|
|
54a51839ea65aa788b18fce8de0ae4f9ba63e4e7 "Make tdb transaction lock
recursive (samba version)" was broken: I "cleaned it up" and prevented
it from ever unlocking.
To see the problem:
$ bin/tdbtorture -s 1248142523
tdb_brlock failed (fd=3) at offset 8 rw_type=1 lck_type=14 len=1
tdb_transaction_lock: failed to get transaction lock
tdb_transaction_start failed: Resource deadlock avoided
My testcase relied on the *count* being correct, which it was. Fixing that
now.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
This patch replaces 6ed27edbcd3ba1893636a8072c8d7a621437daf7 and
1a416ff13ca7786f2e8d24c66addf00883e9cb12, which fixed the bug where traversals
inside transactions would release the transaction lock early.
This solution is more general, and solves the more minor symptom that nested
traversals would also release the transaction lock early. (It was also suggestd in
Volker's comment in 6ed27ed).
This patch also applies to ctdb, if the traverse.c part is removed (ctdb's tdb
code never received the previous two fixes).
Tested using the testsuite from ccan (adapted to the samba code). Thanks to
Michael Adam for feedback.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
This greatly reduces the fragmentation of databases where records
tend to grow slowly by a small amount each time. The case where this
is most seen is the ldb index records. Adding this overallocation
reduced the size of the resulting database by more than 20x when
running a test that adds 10k users.
|
|
The idea behind this is to recover from badly fragmented free
lists. Choosing the point where the file expands is fairly arbitrary,
but seems to work well.
|
|
During a transaction commit tdb normally uses fsync/msync calls to
make it crash safe. This can be disabled using the TDB_NOSYNC flag,
but it wasn't disabling all the code paths that caused a fsync/msync.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Using tdb_transaction_prepare_commit() gives us 2-phase commits. This
allows us to safely commit across multiple tdb databases at once, with
reasonable transaction semantics
Signed-off-by: tridge@samba.org
|
|
should be a noop
The reason for tdb_reopen_all() is that the seek pointer on fds are shared between
parent and child.
metze
|
|
The tdb_repack() function repacks a TDB so that it has a single
freelist entry. The file doesn't shrink, but it does remove all
freelist fragmentation. This code originated in the CTDB vacuuming
code, but will now be used in ldb to cope with fragmentation from
re-indexing
|
|
|
