Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
The "else" keywords are not necessary here, we return in the preceding
if clause
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Mar 5 14:00:47 CET 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
realloc(NULL, ...) is equivalent to malloc. We are already using this
realloc property for tdb->lockrecs. It should not make any difference
in speed, it just makes for a little simpler code.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Feb 19 17:30:13 CET 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
The transaction code uses tdb_alrecord_lock/upgrade, so it should also
use the tdb_allrecord_unlock function just for symmetry reasons
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
For the mutex code we will have to lock the hashchain and the record
lock area independently. So we will have to call the loop twice. And,
it's a small refactoring for the better anyway I think.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
All arguments but the cmd are the same. To me this looks a bit better
and saves some bytes in the object code.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Simo Sorce <idra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sat Feb 16 17:13:32 CET 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
header.hash_size was the only thing we ever referenced outside of
tdb_open_ex and its direct callees. So this shrinks the tdb_context by
164 bytes.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Feb 5 13:18:28 CET 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
These functions are deliberately left without prototypes according to
3fdeaa399, but without prototypes we get warnings.
Reviewed-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Jan 7 11:20:19 CET 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
I had to ask git blame to find why we have to do it here...
Reviewed-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Dec 21 13:54:39 CET 2012 on sn-devel-104
|
|
We usually "goto fail" on every error and then in normal flow set the
return variable to success. This patch removes a comment which from my
point of view is now obsolete. It violates the {} rule from README.Coding
here in favor of the style used in this function.
Reviewed-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
Reviewed-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
Reviewed-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
Reviewed-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
Reviewed-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
Reviewed-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
Avoid an else {} branch when we can do an early return
Reviewed-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
Reviewed-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
Reviewed-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
Reviewed-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
methods->tdb_write expects data in on-disk format. For reading that
record, methods->tdb_read() has taken care of the on-disk to in-memory
representation according to the DOCONV() flag passed down. tdb_rec_write()
is a wrapper around methods->tdb_write just doing the CONVERT() on the
way to disk.
Reviewed-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
When winbind is restarted, there is a potential crash in tdb. Following
situation: We are in a cluster with ctdb. A winbind child hangs
in a request to the DC. Cluster monitoring decides the node has a
problem. Cluster monitoring decides to kill ctdbd. winbind child
still hangs in a RPC request. winbind parent figures that ctdb is
dead and immediately commits suicide. winbind parent is restarted by
cluster management, overwriting gencache.tdb with CLEAR_IF_FIRST. The
CLEAR_IF_FIRST logic as implemented now will not see that a child still
has the tdb open, only the parent holds the ACTIVE_LOCK due to performance
reasons. During the CLEAR_IF_FIRST logic is done, there is a very small
window where we ftruncate(tfd, 0) the file and re-write a proper header
without a lock. When during this small window the winbind child comes
back, wanting to store something into gencache.tdb, that winbind child
will crash with a SIGBUS.
Sounds unlikely? See:
[2012/09/29 07:02:31.871607, 0] lib/util.c:1183(smb_panic)
PANIC (pid 1814517): internal error
[2012/09/29 07:02:31.877596, 0] lib/util.c:1287(log_stack_trace)
BACKTRACE: 35 stack frames:
#0 winbindd(log_stack_trace+0x1a) [0x7feb7d4ca18a]
#1 winbindd(smb_panic+0x2b) [0x7feb7d4ca25b]
#2 winbindd(+0x1a3cc4) [0x7feb7d4bacc4]
#3 /lib64/libc.so.6(+0x32900) [0x7feb7a929900]
#4 /lib64/libc.so.6(memcpy+0x35) [0x7feb7a97f355]
#5 /usr/lib64/libtdb.so.1(+0x6e76) [0x7feb7b0b0e76]
#6 /usr/lib64/libtdb.so.1(+0x3d37) [0x7feb7b0add37]
#7 /usr/lib64/libtdb.so.1(+0x863d) [0x7feb7b0b263d]
#8 /usr/lib64/libtdb.so.1(+0x8700) [0x7feb7b0b2700]
#9 /usr/lib64/libtdb.so.1(+0x2505) [0x7feb7b0ac505]
#10 /usr/lib64/libtdb.so.1(+0x25b7) [0x7feb7b0ac5b7]
#11 /usr/lib64/libtdb.so.1(tdb_fetch+0x13) [0x7feb7b0ac633]
#12 winbindd(gencache_set_data_blob+0x259) [0x7feb7d4d8449]
#13 winbindd(gencache_set+0x53) [0x7feb7d4d85b3]
#14 winbindd(gencache_del+0x5e) [0x7feb7d4d879e]
#15 winbindd(saf_delete+0x93) [0x7feb7d54b693]
#16 winbindd(+0xe507e) [0x7feb7d3fc07e]
#17 winbindd(+0xe85e5) [0x7feb7d3ff5e5]
#18 winbindd(+0xe65be) [0x7feb7d3fd5be]
#19 winbindd(+0xe7562) [0x7feb7d3fe562]
#20 winbindd(init_dc_connection+0x2e) [0x7feb7d3fe5be]
#21 winbindd(+0xe75d9) [0x7feb7d3fe5d9]
#22 winbindd(cm_connect_netlogon+0x58) [0x7feb7d3fe658]
#23 winbindd(_wbint_PingDc+0x61) [0x7feb7d410991]
#24 winbindd(+0x103175) [0x7feb7d41a175]
#25 winbindd(winbindd_dual_ndrcmd+0xb7) [0x7feb7d4107d7]
#26 winbindd(+0xf8609) [0x7feb7d40f609]
#27 winbindd(+0xf9075) [0x7feb7d410075]
#28 winbindd(tevent_common_loop_immediate+0xe8) [0x7feb7d4db198]
#29 winbindd(run_events_poll+0x3c) [0x7feb7d4d93fc]
#30 winbindd(+0x1c2b52) [0x7feb7d4d9b52]
#31 winbindd(_tevent_loop_once+0x90) [0x7feb7d4d9f60]
#32 winbindd(main+0x7b3) [0x7feb7d3e7aa3]
#33 /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xfd) [0x7feb7a915cdd]
#34 winbindd(+0xce2a9) [0x7feb7d3e52a9]
This is in a winbind child, logfiles surrounding indicate the parent
was restarted.
This patch takes all chain locks around the CLEAR_IF_FIRST introduced
tdb_new_database.
|
|
When probing for a size change (eg. just before tdb_expand, tdb_check,
tdb_rescue) we call tdb_oob(tdb, tdb->map_size, 1, 1). Unfortunately
this does nothing if the tdb has actually shrunk, which as Volker
demonstrated, can actually happen if a "longlived" parent crashes.
So move the map/update size/remap before the limit check.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
|
|
This allows for an emergency best-effort dump. It's a little better than
strings(1).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
|
|
Autobuild-User(master): Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Oct 2 19:52:16 CEST 2012 on sn-devel-104
|
|
(As suggested by Stefan Metzmacher, based on the change to ntdb.)
Since commit ec96ea690edbe3398d690b4a953d487ca1773f1c, we handle the case
where a process dies during a transaction commit. Unfortunately, TDB_NOSYNC
means this no longer works, as it disables the recovery area as well as the
actual msync/fsync. We should do everything except the syncs.
This also means we can do a complete test with $TDB_NO_FSYNC set; just
to get more complete coverage, we disable it explicitly for one test
(where we override the actual sync calls anyway).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
|
|
This patch adds two lock functions used by CTDB to perform asynchronous
locking. These functions do not actually perform any fcntl operations,
but only increment internal counters.
- tdb_transaction_write_lock_mark()
- tdb_transaction_write_lock_unmark()
It also exposes two internal functions
- tdb_lock_nonblock()
- tdb_unlock()
These functions are NOT exposed in include/tdb.h to prevent any further
uses of these functions. If you ever need to use these functions, consider
using tdb2.
Signed-off-by: Amitay Isaacs <amitay@gmail.com>
|
|
We unmap the tdb on expand, the remap. But when we have INCOHERENT_MMAP
(ie. OpenBSD) and we're inside a transaction, doing the expand can mean
we need to read from the database to partially fill a transaction block.
This fails, because if mmap is incoherent we never allow accessing the
database via read/write.
The solution is not to unmap and remap until we've actually written the
padding at the end of the file.
Reported-by: Amitay Isaacs <amitay@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Autobuild-User: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Autobuild-Date: Fri Mar 23 02:53:15 CET 2012 on sn-devel-104
|
|
fde694274e1e5a11d1473695e7ec7a97f95d39e4 made tdb_mmap return an int,
but didn't put the return 0 on the "internal db" case.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
|
|
This comment appears in two places in the code (commit
4c6a8273c6dd3e2aeda5a63c4a62aa55bc133099 from 2001):
/*
* We must ensure the file is unmapped before doing this
* to ensure consistency with systems like OpenBSD where
* writes and mmaps are not consistent.
*/
But this doesn't help, because if one process is using mmap and another
using pwrite, we get incoherent results. As demonstrated by OpenBSD's
failure on the tdb unit tests.
Rather than disable mmap on OpenBSD, we test for this issue and force mmap
to be enabled. This means that we will fail on very large TDBs on 32-bit
systems, but it's better than the horrendous performance penalty on every
OpenBSD system.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
|
|
The most convenient way to write unit tests in C is to directly
#include the C files (CCAN uses this, for example). That works quite
well, but it means that tdb_private.h now needs to be protected
against multiple inclusions.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
|
|
Autobuild-User: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date: Fri Jan 6 04:16:41 CET 2012 on sn-devel-104
|
|
This avoids a tdb_fetch, thus a malloc/memcpy/free in the tdb_store path
|
|
We allocate a new recovery area by expanding the file. But if the
recovery area is already at the end of file (as shown in at least one
client case), we can simply expand the record, rather than freeing it
and creating a new one.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Autobuild-User: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Autobuild-Date: Wed Dec 21 06:25:40 CET 2011 on sn-devel-104
|
|
If we're expanding because the current recovery area is too small, we
expand only the amount we need. This can quickly lead to exponential
growth when we have a slowly-expanding record (hence a
slowly-expanding transaction size).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
|
|
|
|
I came across a tdb which had wrapped to 4G + 4K, and the contents had been
destroyed by processes which thought it only 4k long. Fix this by checking
on open, and making tdb_oob() check for wrap itself.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Autobuild-User: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Autobuild-Date: Mon Dec 19 07:52:01 CET 2011 on sn-devel-104
|
|
TDB2 testing revealed that tdb1 doesn't do this. It's minor, but fix it.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Autobuild-User: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Autobuild-Date: Tue Aug 16 10:47:41 CEST 2011 on sn-devel-104
|
|
Andrew Bartlett complained that valgrind needs --partial-loads-ok=yes otherwise
the Jenkins hash makes it complain.
My benchmarking here revealed that at least with modern gcc (4.5) and CPU
(Intel i5 32 bit) there's no measurable performance penalty for the
"correct" code, so rip out the optimized one.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Autobuild-User: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Autobuild-Date: Wed Jun 8 11:05:47 CEST 2011 on sn-devel-104
|
|
If it's really the recovery area, we can trust the rec_len field, and
don't have to go groping for bitpatterns.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Autobuild-User: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Autobuild-Date: Tue Apr 19 14:15:22 CEST 2011 on sn-devel-104
|
|
ldb can create huge records when saving indexes.
Limit the tdb expansion to avoid consuming a lot of memory for
no good reason if the record being saved is huge.
|
|
tdb_repack() is expensive and consumes memory, so we can spend some
effort to see if it's worthwhile. In particular, tdbbackup doesn't
need to repack: it started with an empty database!
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
|
|
This is why macros are dangerous; these were converting the pointers, not the
things pointed to!
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
|
|
|
|
(ret < 0) can never be true
|
|
Autobuild-User: Volker Lendecke <vlendec@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date: Sat Feb 12 19:50:55 CET 2011 on sn-devel-104
|
|
Autobuild-User: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Autobuild-Date: Wed Dec 29 10:12:05 CET 2010 on sn-devel-104
|
|
In order to suppress compiler warnings.
|