Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
Similar to the util_tdb versions, but return the error code.
ntdb_add_int32_atomic seems a clearer name than tdb_change_int32_atomic.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
|
|
Very similar to the tdb version.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
|
|
Very similar to the util_tdb versions, but these return the error.
I've only implemented those functions actually used.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
|
|
There are various issues with NTDB_CLEAR_IF_FIRST which makes it
better if we don't have to use it, but much of the code does, so
we fake up support here.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
|
|
The first function is ntdb_new: this is preferred over ntdb_open, as
it makes the ntdb_context returned (and all NTDB_DATA returned from
ntdb_fetch) valid talloc pointers.
The API is very similar to tdb_wrap_open().
Note that we handle $TDB_NO_FSYNC here, since ntdb doesn't do that
hack (and it's great for speeding up testing!).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
|