Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
Jelmer, you might want to take a look at Andrew B's problem with
--enable-developer --disable-shared --disable-shared-libs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As suggested by Robert Millan.
Michael
|
|
This is based on a patch by the debian package maintainers,
adapted for the merged branch.
Michael
|
|
|
|
|
|
Haven't checked this myself, but as I've already got several reports that Samba
won't compile against current OpenAFS anymore, I just believe Geza Gemes. This
patch only affects AFS code, so it should not hurt anything else.
Volker
|
|
No idea why it works on my Linux without -lpthread ... :-)
|
|
Included if pthreads are found, can be disabled with --enable-pthreadpool=no
Tim, Steven, I haven't yet seen comments from you. You have been asking for
such a thing at SambaXP. Do you like this? :-)
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
Michael
|
|
just like for the libs configured with SMB_LIBRARY().
This makes @LIBWBCLIENT_STATIC@ vanish from the object collections.
Michael
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This makes configure actually behave as the comments describe.
The reversal of order was introduced by mistake in
90ea8ae9b1ed3b7ed1c93076517e026e629ea1aa
Michael
|
|
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
Fix the build on HP/UX
|
|
|
|
Guenther
|
|
This bug results in a failure to use linker scripts to limit the set of symbols
exported by our shared libraries.
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AC_TRY_LINK automatically wraps a main(). Double main() causes this test to fail
on some compilers.
|
|
|
|
This reverts 193be432. The MADVISE_PROTECT is inherited by all child
processes and cannot be unset. The intention of the original patch was
to protect the parent process, but allow children to be killed in low
memory. Since this isn't possible with the current API, reverting the
whole feature.
|
|
auth_onefs_wb.c -> auth_wbc.c
pdb_onefs_sam.c -> pdb_wbc_sam.c
No changes to functionality
|
|
* actually check for existance of sysctlbyname()
|
|
Implements a custom backend for onefs that exclusively uses the wbclient
interface for all passdb calls.
It lacks some features of a standard passdb.
In particular it's a read only interface and doesn't implement privileges.
|
|
This new backend is custom tailored to onefs' unique requirements:
1) No fallback logic
2) Does not validate the domain of the user
3) Handles unencrypted passwords
|
|
Introduce a new configure option --with-wbclient which specifies a
location to find a compatible libwbclient library to link against. This
options is overwritten by --with-winbind
|
|
- Attempt to use syscalls to determine max-open-files value.
- Add in periodic logging when max file limit reached
|
|
|
|
This commit adds a configure argument which allows for setting MADV_PROTECT
in the madvise() API. With this enabled the kernel won't kill SMBD when
it's running low on memory.
|
|
Not only check if it exists and is executable, but also
check whether it accepts the command line "krb5-config --libs gssapi".
Chris Hoogendyk <hoogendyk@bio.umass.edu> has reported configure
failing on a Solaris machine due to krb5-config raising errors on
these options.
Michael
|
|
|
|
Add 'perfcount module = pc_test' to exercise this module. Results are
logged into smb.log every 50 operations (configurable via smb.conf).
|
|
* Much of the beginning should look familiar, as I re-used the OneFS oplock
callback record concept. This was necessary to keep our own state around - it
really only consists of a lock state, per asynchronous lock that is currently
unsatisfied. The onefs_cbrl_callback_records map to BLRs by the id.
* There are 4 states an async lock can be in. NONE means there is no async
currently out for the lock, as opposed to ASYNC. DONE means we've locked
*every* lock (keep in mind a request can ask for multiple locks at a time.)
ERROR is an error.
* onefs_cbrl_async_success: The lock_num is incremented, and the state changed,
so that when process_blocking_lock_queue is run, we will try the *next* lock,
rather than the same one again.
* onefs_brl_lock_windows() has some complicated logic:
* We do a no-op if we're passed a BLR and the matching state is ASYNC --
this means Samba is trying to get the same lock twice, and we just need
to wait longer, so we return an error.
* PENDING lock calls happen when the lock is being queued on the BLQ -- we
do async in this case.
* We also do async in the case that we're passed a BLR, but the lock is not
pending. This is an async lock being probed by process_blocking_lock_queue.
* We do a sync lock for any normal first request of a lock.
* Failure is returned, but it doesn't go to the client unless the lock has
actually timed out.
|
|
Let's just do the test in librt when the first one failed.
|