Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
This will avoid panic calls when smbd and winbind is started in cluster
mode before ctdb is functional. It still logs something sane at debug
level 0, but it does not panic and core anymore.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
Send a raw blob without the messaging.idl wrap
|
|
Because revoking read-only copies of records is expensive, we only
want ctdbd to do it for high-turnover records. A basic heuristic is
that if we don't find a local copy of the record, don't ask for a
read-only copy.
The fetch itself will cause ctdbd to migrate the record, so eventually
we will have a local copy. Next time it gets migrated away, we'll
call ctdbd_fetch() with local_copy = true.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
|
|
This should be a lot quicker than PROCESS_EXISTS followed by looking at
serverid.tdb
Autobuild-User: Volker Lendecke <vlendec@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date: Wed Nov 30 12:47:27 CET 2011 on sn-devel-104
|
|
This sends out a number of process_exists controls in parallel and collects the
replies as they come in.
|
|
|
|
We change all the headers and wscript files to use tdb_compat; this
means we have one place to decide whether to use TDB1 or TDB2.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
|
|
Guenther
|
|
Guenther
|
|
Guenther
Autobuild-User: Günther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date: Thu Mar 24 00:52:01 CET 2011 on sn-devel-104
|
|
|
|
Michael
|
|
|
|
This is the basis to implement global locks in ctdb without depending on a
shared file system. The initial goal is to make ctdb persistent transactions
deterministic without too many timeouts.
|
|
We need to use CTDB_CONTROL_TCP_CLIENT instead of CTDB_CONTROL_TCP_ADD.
CTDB_CONTROL_TCP_CLIENT has support for 2 modes in newer ctdb versions:
- with struct ctdb_control_tcp it only supports ipv4.
- with struct ctdb_control_tcp_addr it supports ipv4 and ipv6.
You need new header files which defines struct ctdb_control_tcp_addr,
but at runtime it should be fine to work against older
ctdb versions (<= 1.0.68).
metze
|
|
This means we correctly pass IPv6 addresses too.
(CTDB_CONTROL_TCP_CLIENT was IPv4 only)
metze
|
|
(This used to be commit f91a3e0f7b7737c1d0667cd961ea950e2b93e592)
|
|
database in an inconsistent state if we crash during the operation
Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@gmail.com>
(This used to be commit 09329f1f9114af44fc4e5e4f29a7315912313125)
|
|
(http://samba.org/~tridge/3_0-ctdb)
Signed-off-by: Alexander Bokovoy <ab@samba.org>(This used to be commit 0c8e23afbbb2d081fc23908bafcad04650bfacea)
|
|
bugs in various places whilst doing this (places that assumed
BOOL == int). I also need to fix the Samba4 pidl generation
(next checkin).
Jeremy.
(This used to be commit f35a266b3cbb3e5fa6a86be60f34fe340a3ca71f)
|
|
(This used to be commit b0132e94fc5fef936aa766fb99a306b3628e9f07)
|
|
Jeremy.
(This used to be commit 407e6e695b8366369b7c76af1ff76869b45347b3)
|
|
I'm 100% certain I've forgotten to merge something, but the main code
should be in. It's mainly in dbwrap_ctdb.c, ctdbd_conn.c and
messages_ctdbd.c.
There should be no changes to the non-cluster case, it does survive make
test on my laptop.
It survives some very basic tests with ctdbd enables, I did not do the
full test suite for clusters yet.
Phew...
Volker
(This used to be commit 15553d6327a3aecdd2b0b94a3656d04bf4106323)
|