samba - Unnamed repository; edit this file 'description' to name the repository.

Age	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Files	Lines
2008-03-27	dbwrap: add db_open_trans()	Stefan Metzmacher	1	-0/+15
	This should be used when transactions are wanted. For now it's just a wrapper of db_open(), but this will change. metze Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org> (This used to be commit 74a070b8a24fea1009e557f711b76fc14e8961dc)
2008-01-16	Merge CTDB-related fixes from samba-ctdb 3.0 branch ↵	Alexander Bokovoy	1	-2/+10
	(http://samba.org/~tridge/3_0-ctdb) Signed-off-by: Alexander Bokovoy <ab@samba.org>(This used to be commit 0c8e23afbbb2d081fc23908bafcad04650bfacea)
2007-12-10	Add dbwrap bystring service routines	Volker Lendecke	1	-0/+42
	(This used to be commit 1e214b536b0628db299d701839e62a4ac52727c9)
2007-10-10	r23784: use the GPLv3 boilerplate as recommended by the FSF and the license text	Andrew Tridgell	1	-2/+1
	(This used to be commit b0132e94fc5fef936aa766fb99a306b3628e9f07)
2007-10-10	r23779: Change from v2 or later to v3 or later.	Jeremy Allison	1	-1/+1
	Jeremy. (This used to be commit 407e6e695b8366369b7c76af1ff76869b45347b3)
2007-10-10	r23410: Merge the core of the cluster code.	Volker Lendecke	1	-0/+26
	I'm 100% certain I've forgotten to merge something, but the main code should be in. It's mainly in dbwrap_ctdb.c, ctdbd_conn.c and messages_ctdbd.c. There should be no changes to the non-cluster case, it does survive make test on my laptop. It survives some very basic tests with ctdbd enables, I did not do the full test suite for clusters yet. Phew... Volker (This used to be commit 15553d6327a3aecdd2b0b94a3656d04bf4106323)
2007-10-10	r22775: For the cluster code I've developed a wrapper around tdb to put ↵	Volker Lendecke	1	-0/+61
	different database backends in place dynamically. The main abstractions are db_context and db_record, it should be mainly self-describing, see include/dbwrap.h. You open the db just as you would open a tdb, this time with db_open(). If you want to fetch a record, just do the db->fetch() call, if you want to do operations on it, you need to get it with fetch_locked(). I added dbwrap_file.c (not heavily tested lately) as an example for what can be done with that abstraction, uses a file per key. So if anybody is willing to shape that up, we might have a chance on reiserfs again.... :-) This abstraction works fine for brlock.tdb, locking.tdb, connections.tdb and sessionid.tdb. It should work fine for the others as well, I just did not yet get around to convert them. If nobody loudly screams NO, then I will import the code that uses this soon. Volker (This used to be commit e9d7484ca246cfca4a1fd23be35edc2783136ebe)