| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Only filled in for tdb so far, for rbt it's pointless, and ctdb itself needs to
be extended
(This used to be commit 0a55e018dd68af06d84332d54148bbfb0b510b22)
|
|
In this low-level code, play tricks to reduce the number of allocations to the
possible minimum. I would not recommend this for higher-level code, but here it
pays off.
(This used to be commit 71b1e6ff1595fbaa8dd49b996c45541531c7e98c)
|
|
initial-v3-2-unstable-716-g12cce3b
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 06:04:32PM -0600, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> Fix valgrind error in dbwrap_rbt where rec_priv->node was
> being accessed after free. VALOKER PLEASE CHECK THIS VERY
> CAREFULLY !!!! This is a correct fix in that it fixes the
> valgrind error, but it looks inelegant to me. I think if
> I understood this code better I could craft a more subtle
> fix. Still looking at it....
Thanks a lot. Fully correct. What about the attached little
simplification?
Volker
(This used to be commit 5b72828600fb057a7aeb5f1a6fb6c23c23f28cd8)
|
|
keyval.
Jeremy.
(This used to be commit 39f3efbcc5fbdff1db1b12e5fc7368968f240993)
|
|
being accessed after free. VALOKER PLEASE CHECK THIS VERY
CAREFULLY !!!! This is a correct fix in that it fixes the
valgrind error, but it looks inelegant to me. I think if
I understood this code better I could craft a more subtle
fix. Still looking at it....
Jeremy.
(This used to be commit 12cce3be2a24fd72106d747890caf6c7f29db43d)
|
|
This is meant as a replacement for the internal tdb. To me it seems a bit silly
that for in-memory structures we do our own memory management. With this rbt
based approach we can make use of the system-supplied malloc.
(This used to be commit 54e5d4404619443caed32e2acff8921cdbff9ed1)
|
