| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
The performance of these is minimal (these days) and they can return
invalid results when used as part of applications that do not use
sys_fork().
Autobuild-User: Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date: Sat Mar 24 21:55:41 CET 2012 on sn-devel-104
|
|
My previous patches fixed up all direct TDB callers, but there are a
few utility functions and the db_context functions which are still
using the old -1 / 0 return codes.
It's clearer to fix up all the callers of these too, so everywhere is
consistent: non-zero means an error.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
|
|
We don't expose freelist or hash size for TDB2.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
|
|
TDB2 returns a negative error number on failure. This is compatible
if we always check for < 0 instead of == -1.
Also, there's no tdb_traverse_read in TDB2: we don't try to make
traverse reliable any more, so there are no write locks anyway.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
|
|
Guenther
|
|
Guenther
|
|
Jeremy.
|
|
|
|
Open winbindd_cache.tdb with read/write access when validate the cache,
otherwise, validation fails to get lock in tdb_check. It results in
validation failure even the cache is good.
Signed-off-by: Bo Yang <boyang@samba.org>
|
|
metze
|
|
Jeremy.
|
|
It did not like to include "includes.h" twice
|
|
Michael
|
|
So this gets now linked only into its single user: winbindd
(needed by winbindd_cache.c)
Michael
|
