Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
This implements an idea by metze: Right now Samba does not grant level2
oplocks where it should: After an initial no-oplock open that has been
written to, we don't have the FAKE_LEVEL2_OPLOCK entry in locking.tdb
around anymore, this downgraded to NO_OPLOCK. Windows in this case will
grant level2 if being asked, we don't. Part of the reason for this
is that we don't have a proper mechanism to communicate the fact that
level2 needs to be broken to other smbds. Metze's insight was that we
have to look into brlock.tdb for every write anyway, so this might be
the right place to store this information.
My first reaction was that this is really hackish, but on further thought
this is not. oplocks depend on brlocks anyway, and we have the proper
mechanisms in place for brlocks.
The format for this change is to add one byte to the end of the brlock.tdb
record with value 1 if we have level2 oplocks around. Thus this patch
effectively reverts 8f41142 which I discovered while writing this
change. We now legally have unaligned records.
We can certainly talk about the format, but I'm not yet convinced we
need an idl for this yet. This is a potentially very hot code path,
and ndr marshalling has a cost.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
With the rewritten brl_get_lock_readonly we only set the destructor for
r/w lock records anyway.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sun Oct 6 22:20:05 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
This is step 1 to get rid of brl_get_locks_internal with its complex readonly
business. It also optimizes 2 things: First, it uses dbwrap_parse_record to
avoid a talloc and memcpy, and second it uses talloc_pooled_object.
And -- hopefully it is easier to understand the caching logic with
fsp->brlock_rec and the clustering escape.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
Without clustering, fsp->brlock_rec will never be set anyway. In the
clustering case we can't use the seqnum trick, so this is slow enough
that the additional if-statement does not matter in this case anyway. In
the non-clustered case it might. Have not measured it, but every little
bit helps I guess.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sun Oct 6 15:49:43 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
If someone messes with brlock.tdb and inserts an invalid record length,
this will lead to memcpy overwriting a few bytes behind malloc'ed data.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Sep 12 03:26:45 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
Autobuild-User(master): Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Sep 11 10:15:38 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For a given file, clean up brl entries belonging to a given persistent file id.
Signed-off-by: Gregor Beck <gbeck@sernet.de>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
brl_reconnect_disconnected()
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Gregor Beck <gbeck@sernet.de>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
servers in traverses
We should not remove locks of disconnected opens just like that.
When getting the byte range lock record for a newly connected file
handle, we still do the clean up, because in that situation,
disconnected entries are not valid any more.
Signed-off-by: Gregor Beck <gbeck@sernet.de>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Gregor Beck <gbeck@sernet.de>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
...instead of checking each server-id separately which can
be expensive in a cluster.
Signed-off-by: Gregor Beck <gbeck@sernet.de>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
redundent -> redundant
Signed-off-by: Karolin Seeger <kseeger@samba.org>
|
|
Pair-Programmed-With: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
fsp->fnum and lock->fnum are uint64_t already and we should not truncate the value here.
Currently this doesn't matter as we only use 16-bit.
But as 'int' is int32_t and we later compare fnum with lock->fnum == fnum,
the cast from int32_t to uint64_t goes via int64_t instead of uint32_t.
This means even if fsp->fnum just uses 32-bit of the uint64_t
we'll get the wrong result, as the implicit cast from a negative int32_t
value to uint64_t adds 0xFFFFFFFF00000000.
metze
|
|
metze
|
|
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
Note: this changes the format of brlock.tdb!
Pair-Programmed-With: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date: Wed Jun 6 23:22:00 CEST 2012 on sn-devel-104
|
|
Pair-Programmed-With: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
This will be used to enforce a lock hierarchy between the databases. We have
seen deadlocks between locking.tdb, brlock.tdb, serverid.tdb and notify*.tdb.
These should be fixed by refusing a dbwrap_fetch_locked that does not follow a
defined lock hierarchy.
|
|
metze
|
|
metze
|
|
Autobuild-User: Richard Sharpe <sharpe@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date: Mon Dec 12 04:58:40 CET 2011 on sn-devel-104
|
|
Avoid direct use of the db_record and db_context structs.
|
|
Autobuild-User: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date: Fri Jul 29 13:34:22 CEST 2011 on sn-devel-104
|
|
Also start new folder lib/dbwrap/ where dbwrap_open.c is stored and
make the fallbacke implementation functoins non-static and create a
dbwrap_private.h header file that contains their prototypes.
|
|
all locks
Reported by herb@samba.org. Remove the (premature) optimization
on file close.
Autobuild-User: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date: Sat Jul 16 02:32:02 CEST 2011 on sn-devel-104
|
|
My previous patches fixed up all direct TDB callers, but there are a
few utility functions and the db_context functions which are still
using the old -1 / 0 return codes.
It's clearer to fix up all the callers of these too, so everywhere is
consistent: non-zero means an error.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
|
|
This is needed for OpenChange, which prints Samba struct server_id
values in debug messages.
Andrew Bartlett
|
|
Using the standard macro makes it easier to move code into common, as
TALLOC_MEMDUP isn't standard talloc.
|
|
Using the standard macro makes it easier to move code into common, as
TALLOC_ZERO_P isn't standard talloc.
|
|
Using the standard macro makes it easier to move code into common, as
TALLOC_P isn't standard talloc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guenther
|
|
Guenther
|
|
Will later become part of locking.h
Guenther
|