samba - Unnamed repository; edit this file 'description' to name the repository.

Age	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Files	Lines
1998-10-09	signed / unsigned issues spotted by herb	Luke Leighton	1	-6/+6
	(This used to be commit 0b90442021aa3adb5ae7f09c53c9e54c7655d8c5)
1998-10-09	dce/rpc.	Luke Leighton	1	-4/+4
	(This used to be commit e0445419b2d50ae6efef36f4f295ebcfdbf1ad82)
1998-10-09	dce/rpc	Luke Leighton	1	-17/+17
	(This used to be commit 32d0f5e4a564686ad6b270dd24423ee49a81f223)
1998-10-08	dce/rpc	Luke Leighton	1	-66/+112
	(This used to be commit 62fdeef1b79c5c4c9bf0e860881651711bb80b9a)
1998-10-07	dce/rpc	Luke Leighton	1	-41/+169
	(This used to be commit 6677b888bdb45df00646eb7cc13005b9465ff971)
1998-10-07	dce/rpc	Luke Leighton	1	-9/+6
	(This used to be commit 34afa638f6f7bb145ec094510ac58f7a22dfc3aa)
1998-10-07	put #if BROKEN_CODE around all the bits of code in rpc_parse.c that	Andrew Tridgell	1	-1/+8
	don't compile. Luke, you'll need to remove these when you've fixed the code. (This used to be commit 4f411d62640615ce94667ddb9946082e72e23bb6)
1998-10-06	dce/rpc	Luke Leighton	1	-54/+134
	(This used to be commit eb279cabd059603b6c8d9b74e4fd31c4ffe87593)
1998-09-05	tridge the destroyer returns!	Andrew Tridgell	1	-31/+7
	prompted by the interpret_security() dead code that Jean-Francois pointed out I added a make target "finddead" that finds potentially dead (ie. unused) code. It spat out 304 function names ... I went through these are deleted many of them, making others static (finddead also reports functions that are used only in the local file). in doing this I have almost certainly deleted some useful code. I may have even prevented compilation with some compile options. I apologise. I decided it was better to get rid of this code now and add back the one or two functions that are needed than to keep all this baggage. So, if I have done a bit too much "destroying" then let me know. Keep the swearing to a minimum :) One bit I didn't do is the ubibt code. Chris, can you look at that? Heaps of unused functions there. Can they be made static? (This used to be commit 2204475c87f3024ea8fd1fbd7385b2def617a46f)
1998-04-10	includes.h: Moved HPUX undefine of SEMMSL to where it actually does something.	Jeremy Allison	1	-8/+33
	ipc.c: Added Luke's debug statement. locking_slow.c: Added FTRUNCATE_NEEDS_ROOT code for broken systems that need it (not sure what these are yet). membuffer.c ntdomain.h proto.h lib/rpc/include/rpc_dce.h lib/rpc/include/rpc_srvsvc.h lib/rpc/parse/parse_prs.c lib/rpc/parse/parse_rpc.c lib/rpc/server/srv_pipe_hnd.c lib/rpc/server/srv_util.c: Re-merge of Luke's NTDOM changes 'cos he's a lazy git with carpel tunnel syndrome :-). Jeremy. (This used to be commit 52e3966fbcf7b5fbdbc7cbe9ac0b453ab5bf3217)
1998-03-11	"For I have laboured mightily on Luke's code, and hath broken	Jeremy Allison	1	-0/+528
	all I saw" - the book of Jeremy, chapter 1 :-). So here is the mega-merge of the NTDOM branch server code. It doesn't include the new client side pieces, we'll look at that later. This should give the same functionality, server wise, as the NTDOM branch does, only merged into the main branch. Any fixes to domain controler functionality should be added to the main branch, not the NTDOM branch. This code compiles without warnings on gcc2.8, but will need further testing before we are sure all the working functionality of the NTDOM server branch has been correctly carried over. I hereby declare the server side of the NTDOM branch dead (and all who sail in her :-). Jeremy. (This used to be commit 118ba4d77a33248e762a2cf843fb7cbc906ee6e7)